To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
More people than ever are receiving support for mental health issues, and instances of suicide continue to grow. Although mental health funding has increased, UK government figures evidence that the National Health Service (NHS) does not have the resources required to respond to such growth in demand. The experiences of staff working in mental health services can offer insight into the efficacy of current provision and assist in service evaluation; however, research examining this issue outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the context of community mental health, is lacking.
Aims
We aimed to explore the perspectives of staff working in a variety of mental health services in North-West England, to elucidate the current standard of care provided and highlight areas for improvement.
Method
One-to-one interviews were conducted with 26 staff members as part of a qualitative grounded theory analysis.
Results
Findings portrayed a community in crisis, consisting of the following themes: stabilisation not recovery, inefficient pathways and barriers to collaboration.
Conclusions
NHS services are struggling to meet the mental health needs of the population, resulting in lengthy waiting times for therapy, a lack of intervention-focused care and an over-reliance on the third sector. While crisis cafés are provided at low cost and result in satisfaction, policy-makers must ensure that these receive adequate funding and do not become overburdened. Staff reported that collaboration between clinical and non-clinical services would improve care pathways and reduce strain on the NHS, but judgemental attitudes and inflexible service development must be challenged to achieve this.
Qualitative research addresses important healthcare questions, including patients’ experiences with interventions. Qualitative evidence syntheses combine findings from individual studies and are increasingly used to inform health guidelines. However, dissemination bias—selective non-dissemination of studies or findings—may distort the body of evidence. This study examined reasons for the non-dissemination of qualitative studies. We identified conference abstracts reporting qualitative, health-related studies. We invited authors to answer a survey containing quantitative and qualitative questions. We performed descriptive analyses on the quantitative data and inductive thematic analysis on the qualitative data. Most of the 142 respondents were female, established researchers. About a third reported that their study had not been published in full after their conference presentation. The main reasons were time constraints, career changes, and a lack of interest. Few indicated non-publication due to the nature of the study findings. Decisions not to publish were largely made by author teams. Half of the 72% who published their study reported that all findings were included in the publication. This study highlights researchers’ reasons for non-dissemination of qualitative research. One-third of studies presented as conference abstracts remained unpublished, but non-dissemination was rarely linked to the study findings. Further research is needed to understand the systematic non-dissemination of qualitative studies.
The decision-making process regarding antipsychotic continuation or discontinuation following remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP) remains complex and underresearched. While discontinuation increases the risk of relapse, concerns over long-term side-effects such as metabolic disturbances and extrapyramidal symptoms also exist. Current guidelines recommend maintaining antipsychotics for 1–5 years, emphasising shared decision-making (SDM) between clinicians and patients.
Aims
This study aimed to explore the decision-making process and describe the factors influencing the decision to discontinue or continue antipsychotic treatment following remission from FEP, from the patients’ perspective.
Method
A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 12 individuals in remission from FEP who received care at early intervention services in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected through online semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically to identify key factors influencing treatment decisions.
Results
The decision-making process was activated by treatment reflection triggers and shaped by various perceptions (of illness, treatment and stigma) and relationships (with friends, family and the clinical team), ultimately leading to decisions to either discontinue, continue (at standard or reduced dose) or remain ambivalent. This dynamic process was guided by participants’ motivators, such as well-being and societal contribution. Most participants felt that discontinuation discussions were not initiated by the clinical team.
Conclusions
The decision-making process is driven by motivators that were found to be linked to the concept of personal recovery. This study highlights the need for proactive, personalised discussions between clinicians and patients. Future research should focus on decision aids tailored to the FEP population to support SDM and improve treatment outcomes.
This editorial piece addresses the relationship between clinical practice and qualitative research in child and adolescent mental health. We outline some guiding assumptions informing the development of a practice orientated research ‘lab’ which focusses on child and adolescent mental health and child welfare research with ethnographic and psychosocial methodologies. We consider cascading effects of practitioner-initiated research, where skills and ambitions for a ‘bottom up’ research culture can help professionals embed research-minded practice in services. We also address the role of researcher and methodological reflexivity in research that is close to the social and emotional complexity of practice. We suggest ‘labs’ for such practice-near research generate opportunities for clinical ideas to be examined more effectively as they are resituated outside of the clinic for the purposes of research; furthermore such research can support critical awareness of the socially and historically contingent quality of methods and practices.
This qualitative study aimed to explore the lived experiences, challenges, and perceptions of nurses regarding disaster preparedness in non–first-tier (inland) cities in China. Building upon our previous quantitative findings, we sought to understand the psychological, professional, and organizational factors that influence nurses’ disaster response capabilities in resource-limited settings.
Methods
A descriptive phenomenological approach was employed. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 nurses from four comprehensive hospitals at or above the second level in Yongcheng City, Henan Province, China, between September and December 2023. Participants were purposively selected based on their involvement in disaster response activities. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Colaizzi’s 7-step method.
Results
Five major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Psychological Stress and Emotional Adaptation, (2) Disaster Emergency Response Capacity and Management, (3) Communication and Collaboration, (4) Challenges in Disaster Nursing Capacity Development, and (5) Impact of Disaster Relief Participation. Key findings revealed that nurses experienced significant psychological pressure during disaster response, struggled with limited specialized training opportunities, faced challenges in team coordination, and identified institutional barriers to disaster preparedness enhancement. Despite these challenges, participants demonstrated strong professional commitment and developed personal coping strategies.
Conclusions
This study provides critical insights into the lived experiences of nurses during disaster response in Chinese non–first-tier cities. The findings highlight the need for systematic psychological support mechanisms, specialized disaster nursing training programs tailored to local contexts, enhanced interhospital collaboration networks, and stronger institutional commitment to disaster preparedness. These insights complement our previous quantitative findings and offer a comprehensive foundation for developing targeted interventions to enhance disaster nursing capabilities in resource-limited settings.
This article responds to Wells & Giacco’s discussion of the theoretical frameworks that guide qualitative research. In addition to the methods they explore, I describe ethnography, focusing on the anthropological investigation of culture. I use examples from the research literature to highlight the unique values of ethnography. I describe what ethnography entails, before outlining illustrations of how ethnographic research has contributed to psychiatric clinical practice. Although it is difficult to generalise from the findings of ethnographic research, its focus on how social processes work and how people perceive them in a particular context makes it useful for advancing improvements in clinical care.
Meaning-making in psychotic experiences may affect mental health recovery by influencing the degree to which a person experiences Meaning in Life (MIL). However, how meaning made in such experiences impacts MIL is poorly understood. We aimed to explore how service users engage in meaning-making in their experience of a first-episode psychosis (FEP) (as well as subsequent and current psychotic experiences), and to identify if and how this meaning has influenced their current perspective on MIL.
Methods:
The study aim was addressed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). We used purposive maximum variation sampling and conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 members of an epidemiologically complete FEP incidence cohort in the Republic of Ireland. Data analysis was guided by IPA procedures.
Results:
We found psychotic experiences both contributed to and eroded MIL but also created memory blanks, blocking the process of meaning-making. Meaning-making in psychotic experiences involved: Living with the impact of psychosis on the self and identity (Survival); Reconnecting with time to move forward in time (Restoring temporality); Navigating agency and powerlessness in chaos (Reclaiming control); Generating Meaning in Life in a vacuum (Presence in absence); and Trying to find a home for psychosis or not needing to (Narrative re-storying).
Conclusions:
Findings challenge current meaning-making theory; suggesting that it may not be fully applicable to the lives of people experiencing psychosis. Our data also have implications for the implementation of trauma informed care, the recovery approach in mental health, clinical practice, and research.
Although decentralized research is being used more frequently, few data are available regarding barriers for potential subjects related to engaging in decentralized research with remote biospecimen collection, especially within pregnancy and birth cohorts that include individuals of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.
Methods:
Focus groups and individual interviews with pregnant and postpartum women were conducted in English and Spanish. Thematic analysis was used to identify motivators and barriers to participation in decentralized research involving biospecimens.
Results:
Sixty women (35% Hispanic/Latino, 23% Black, 18% Asian, 15% non-Hispanic White) participated in 10 focus groups (English = 8, Spanish = 2) and 11 individual interviews (English = 7, Spanish = 4). Three themes emerged about factors that could promote participation in decentralized biospecimen collection: 1) convenience, 2) autonomy, and 3) benefit (to self, community or society). Four themes emerged about potential barriers: 1) lack of interaction with trained professionals, 2) inability to coordinate with existing clinical care, 3) discomfort and invasiveness, and 4) concerns about data transparency and security. Overall, participants felt more comfortable providing biospecimens for themselves compared to their child and with biospecimens perceived as less painful or invasive to obtain.
Discussion:
Our findings suggest that transparency about the purposes and use of collecting biospecimen and clear instructions (such as written and instructional videos) could improve biospecimen collection in decentralized pregnancy and birth cohorts. Additionally, opportunities for virtual interaction with study staff and options related to collection of certain biospecimens such as blood (mobile collection unit with trained staff versus a self-collection device) may also improve participant engagement.
To overcome the dearth of high-quality, evidence-based, role-specific training for community health workers and promotoras (CHW/Ps) working with research teams, we developed and evaluated a peer-led research best practices training for CHW/Ps. This article qualitatively explores the training experiences from the perspectives of CHW/Ps.
Methods:
CHW/Ps were recruited from communities and partners affiliated with study sites in Michigan, Florida, and California to participate in peer facilitated trainings in English and Spanish. A purposeful sample of CHW/Ps completed interviews from July to December 2023 about their perceptions of the training. Three coders analyzed the interviews using a combination of the rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique and thematic text analysis.
Results:
Seventeen CHW/Ps participated in interviews (N = 10 in English; N = 7 in Spanish). The mean age was 43.7 ± 14.5 years, most were female (59%), and 47% identified as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish. We identified three primary themes, each with resulting subthemes: (1) CHW/Ps’ Perceptions of the Training, (2) Factors Influencing Receipt of the Training, and (3) CHW/Ps’ Recommendations for Future Trainings. Despite offering some opportunities for improvement in various areas, CHW/P learners found the training further clarified their role as CHW/Ps, enhanced their knowledge and skills, and provided a beneficial foundation for CHW/Ps working in community-engaged research.
Conclusion:
A peer-led research best practices training for CHW/Ps is an effective strategy for enhancing CHW/Ps’ knowledge and skills. Training CHW/Ps in research best practices is a strategy for enhancing the capacity and capability of this community-engaged research workforce
Timely integration of palliative care (PC) into standard oncology hospital care offers significant benefits to patients with incurable cancer and their families. International recognition of the importance of timely PC has shifted the focus from integration to determining the optimal timing for introducing PC. The specific care responsibilities of oncology clinicians acting as generalists in PC and the optimal timing for involving PC specialists remain uncertain.
Objectives
This study aimed to (1) explore how the concept of “timely PC” is understood by oncology clinicians and patients with incurable cancer and (2) investigate how PC is provided in a timely manner in daily clinical practice.
Methods
An interview study was conducted with 18 oncology clinicians (7 physicians, 1 physician assistant, and 10 nurses/nurse practitioners) and 12 patients with incurable cancer. The interviews were conducted between October 2022 and June 2023 and a thematic analysis of the interviews was performed.
Results
Three main themes emerged regarding “timely PC”: (1) timely PC is individual and situational, (2) identification of the right time is an ongoing challenge, and (3) proactive care is essential. Regarding the provision of timely PC, 3 themes were identified: (1) having a strong collaboration among various clinicians, (2) having the courage to start a clear and sincere conversation, and (3) being sensitive and personal.
Significance of results
Being timely is not a fixed point in time, but depends on the individual patient and their situation. Clinicians should be proactive and gradual in bringing up PC-related topics and be careful to use the right words. Tools such as the surprise question can support in timely integrating PC but being timely PC highly depends on a patient’s individual context. Therefore, clinicians should be aware that timely PC is a constant search for the most fitting moment.
Interventions based on testing and communication training have been developed to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare (PHC) for the treatment of acute lower respiratory infections (ALRTIs). However, research based on the experiences of PHC clinicians participating in ALTRIs interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing in Barcelona is scanty.
Aim:
This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of clinicians (physicians and nurses) on an intervention to reduce antibiotic prescription in PHC in Barcelona (Spain). This intervention was a randomised controlled study (cRCT) based on three arms: 1) use of a C-reactive protein (CRP) rapid test; 2) enhanced communication skills; and 3) combination of CRP rapid test and enhanced communication skills. In addition, the study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the detection of ALRTIs.
Methods:
This qualitative study used a socio-constructivist perspective. Sampling was purposive. Participants were selected based on age, sex, profession, intervention trial arm in which they participated, and the socioeconomic area of the PHC where they worked. They were recruited through the healthcare centres participating in the study. Nine participants (7 women and 2 men) participated in two focus groups, lasting 65–66 min, in September–October 2022. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data.
Findings:
Three themes were identified: ‘(The intervention) gave us reassurance’: intervention experiences among health professionals. This theme includes accounts of clinicians’ satisfaction with the intervention, particularly with CRP testing to support clinical diagnoses; ‘We don’t have time in primary healthcare’: structural and community resources in healthcare services. This theme encompasses clinicians’ experiences on healthcare pressures and PHC organisational structures barriers to PHC interventions; and ‘I only did three CRP’: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the intervention. The last theme focuses on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the intervention’s implementation.
Conclusions:
CPR testing and promoting communication skills can be useful tools to support clinical decisions for ALRTIs. Structural barriers (e.g., healthcare pressures) and social inequities amongst service users were acknowledged as the main barriers for the implementation of ALRTIs interventions.
While nutrition plays a major role in health, medical students have generally not received adequate nutritional education, lack confidence in their nutritional knowledge and feel unqualified to offer nutrition advice to future patients. Culinary medicine programmes have been developed to address this gap and employ an active learning approach that integrates medical and nutritional learning with the acquisition of culinary competencies and skills. This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the Université Laval culinary medicine course based on students’ experiences of the course structure, active learning approach and its influence on their lifestyle, clinical practice and future approach to nutrition as physicians.
Design:
Discussion groups were conducted. Thematic content analysis of discussion group data was performed.
Setting:
A first French-language culinary medicine course was developed and pilot tested at Université Laval. The curriculum of this course combined online training videos on medical and nutritional concepts, hands-on cooking sessions and the realisation of a collaborative project.
Participants:
Pre-clerkship medical students enrolled in the elective culinary medicine course at each pilot project semesters (fall 2022: n 12, winter 2023: n 12).
Results:
Students valued the course’s innovative active learning approach, noting improvements in their diet, nutrition and cooking knowledge, skills, self-efficacy and confidence. They also developed greater critical thinking regarding nutrition and recognised their role in collaborating with dietitians.
Conclusion:
The culinary medicine course demonstrated prospective benefits for medical students, potentially improving their personal and future patients’ health and the integration of nutrition into medical education and practice.
Cash transfer programmes (CTPs) provide financial support to alleviate poverty and promote economic stability. The Bolsa Família Programme (BFP), a Brazilian initiative and the world’s largest CTP by number of beneficiaries, aims to improve living conditions. While poverty is closely linked to poor mental health, evidence regarding the specific effects of CTPs on young adults’ mental health remains limited, underscoring the need for further research.
Aims
To understand the meaning attributed to the BFP by young adults regarding their future aspirations and mental health, as well as perspectives from providers.
Method
This qualitative study was conducted at the outskirts of São Paulo city, involving 12 in-depth interviews with young adults aged 18–24 years and 2 focus groups comprising 17 health and social assistance professionals.
Results
Thematic analysis identified four themes according with interviews and focus groups: (a) perceptions about poverty (hopelessness and lack of opportunities); (b) impact of poverty on mental health (anxiety, unpredictability and hopelessness as consequences of living in poverty); (c) young adults’ needs and aspirations (job opportunities as the main expectation for a better future); and (d) BFP limitations and opportunities for improvement (BFP perceived as just one of the survival strategies but not impacting life opportunities for young adults).
Conclusions
The BFP was valued as essential for meeting poor families’ basic needs. Employment opportunities were central to young adults’ expectations, often causing anguish and anxiety. Expanding the BFP to include employment and income-generation policies could better support the mental health and life opportunities of vulnerable youth.
There is a need for better collaborative care between services to improve healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities. In the UK, the learning disability psychiatry multidisciplinary team (MDT) is a specialist team responsible for providing and coordinating care for people with intellectual disabilities.
Aims
To document learning disability MDT perspectives on factors influencing healthcare quality for people with intellectual disabilities.
Method
Healthcare professionals who were members of a learning disability MDT within a National Health Service Trust in the West Midlands were purposively sampled for interview (n = 11). Participants included psychiatrists, nurses, occupational therapists and speech and language therapists. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s six-stage approach.
Results
Factors influencing the quality of healthcare provision included: the learning disability MDT working to overcome systemic barriers; the consequences of specific failures within mainstream healthcare services, such as diagnostic overshadowing; inadequate use of information collated in health passports; and inadequate capacity assessments of people with intellectual disabilities. Improvements in healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities require better accessibility to healthcare and better training for healthcare professionals so they can understand the health needs of people with intellectual disabilities.
Conclusions
A rapid review of practices around health passports for people with intellectual disabilities should be conducted. Healthcare professionals working in mainstream healthcare services need an increased awareness of the harms of diagnostic overshadowing and inadequate capacity assessments. Conclusions are based on findings from MDTs within one health board; future work may focus on understanding perspectives from different teams.
To understand participant perspectives on an effective, practical, comprehensive telehealth intervention for persistently poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and examine how its components contributed to improved outcomes, with the goal of informing broader telehealth-based diabetes management strategies.
Methods:
We conducted semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of patients and staff in the comprehensive telehealth arm of the Practical Telehealth to Improve Control and Engagement for Patients with Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus study. Using the lens of patient engagement, we applied directed content analysis to categorize themes across the five components of the intervention.
Results:
The purposive sample included 19 patients (79% male, 53% Black, varying levels of intervention engagement) and 8 staff. The telemonitoring component was associated with encouragement and motivation among patients; staff found satisfaction in providing metrics of success for participants. For the self-management component, patients saw staff as helpful with problem-solving; staff felt patients were receptive to education. Medication management supported medication adherence and optimization and was acceptable to patients. Diet/activity support motivated behavioral changes among patients. Staff felt that depression support allowed for responsiveness to medical and behavioral factors influencing self-management. Identified areas for improvement included staff time constraints, patient difficulties with taking and transmitting data, and challenges with patient adherence among those with mental health conditions.
Conclusion:
Findings from this study provide insights that may inform the design, implementation, and scalability of comprehensive telehealth models for diabetes management across diverse healthcare settings.
Objective. Witnessing existential suffering in patients is associated with increased risks of compassion fatigue and burnout in palliative care physicians. Finding meaning is a protective factor for burnout and is associated with increased job satisfaction and a sense of purpose.
While the significance of finding meaning through the doctor-patient relationship is widely recognized, less is known about the subjective experience of palliative care physicians, how they ascribe meaning, and how meaning sustains them. The aim of this study was to describe and interpret how palliative care physicians experience meaning when caring for patients.
Method. Hermeneutic-phenomenology, inspired by the philosophy of Heidegger and Gadamer, informed the methodological approach. Ten palliative care physicians, caring for adult patients, completed semi-structured interviews. Van Manen’s “lifeworld existentials” supported our reflexive hermeneutic analysis to interpret participants’ moments of meaning-making.
Results. Our analysis identified two interpretive concepts for meaning-making: moments of connection and moments of transformation. Meaningful connection occurred when physicians and patients together acknowledged existential suffering in death and dying and experienced it on a personal, human level. Often, experiences were fleeting but had a lasting impact. Experiences of connection had a transformational effect on physicians and were associated with a sense of reward and purpose in palliative care work.
Significance of results. Findings are discussed in relation to philosophical literature on the experience of time, contrasting man-made time with the existential experience of time. Moments of connection and transformation experienced by palliative care physicians fueled their commitment to their profession. At a time when burn-out is rife, identifying, describing, and understanding moments of meaning may offer protective benefits for physicians working in palliative care.
We report on an experience with impostor research participants, people who misrepresent themselves, and identify characteristics that can be used by investigators to screen out such participants. We compare the responses of impostor and valid participants, showing that impostors meaningfully change qualitative study findings with implications for policy interventions or follow-on research informed by the study. It is important for investigators to be alert to the potential for impostor participants and plan their research accordingly.
This study aimed to explore what is important for hospice providers to know when a seriously ill parent has adolescent children.
Methods
The sample included 18 young adults (18–28 years old) whose parents died in hospice or palliative care while they were adolescents (12–18 years old). Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a thematic analysis. Themes emerged from the data and were determined by consensus.
Results
The participants described a variety of skills that are important for hospice providers to know. They provided specific suggestions for hospice providers who seek to help adolescents navigate this critical time when their parents are dying or have recently died.
Significance of results
These results can also be used to inform the development of interventions that assist hospice providers with strategies tailored to an adolescent’s specific needs. Future research should investigate these topics with a larger, more diverse sample.
Caregivers play a significant role in the process of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD), reporting stances of support, opposition, or ambivalence. Though caregiver vulnerability is recognized, little is understood about how caregivers adjust when patients seek VAD. We sought to appreciate how bereaved caregivers of patients in organizations that did not participate in VAD processed and adapted to the challenges faced.
Methods
We purposefully recruited caregivers from cases reviewed in a retrospective study exploring how VAD impacted the quality of palliative care. We further expanded sampling to maximize diverse views. We used qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore unique caregiver perspectives.
Results
Twenty-three caregivers completed interviews. Most were female, Australian-born, retired, identified with no religion, bereaved for 1–3 years, and in a caregiving role for 1–5 years. Caregivers sought accompaniment and non-abandonment across all stages of VAD. Coping was enhanced through framing and reframing thought processes and reconciling values. Caregivers bore responsibility through heightened emotions and experienced isolation and anticipatory grief as they reconciled perceived societal attitudes. Caregivers additionally failed to understand the rationale behind organizational stances and were unable to articulate the moral conflicts that arose. Impartiality from professionals was valued for caregivers to sustain care for the patient.
Significance of Results
Despite feelings of vulnerability and isolation, caregivers demonstrated benevolence, courage, and self-compassion, reframing and accommodating their concerns. Professional accompaniment and non-abandonment necessitate solidarity and empowerment, without necessarily enabling VAD. Findings demonstrated the need for individuals and organizations to clearly articulate their willingness to continue to accompany patients, regardless of their position on VAD.
People with intellectual disability experience significant health inequality, and consequently poor health outcomes. Although research can facilitate change, there is a risk of researchers propagating inequity by selecting methods that exclude people with some forms of intellectual disability. We argue for participatory research methods that enable inclusion.