To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides an overview of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in children and young people. The definition and classification of NDDs is discussed, including key differences between ICD-10 and ICD-11 and the problematic use of language in diagnostic classifications, which is at odds with the social model of disability. Important stages of a multidisciplinary assessment of NDDs include a detailed developmental history, a psychosocial history, observation of the child, an assessment of the child’s communication and learning and supplementary rating scales. The role of professionals such as Community Paediatricians, Speech and Language Therapists, Occupational Therapists, teachers and Educational Psychologists is highlighted. Features of the main NDDs are outlined, including Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Specific Disorders of Development and Language and Tic disorders. Finally, an overview of treatment approaches and their evidence base is explored.
Off-licence psychotropic use in people with intellectual disability and/or autism, in the absence of psychiatric illness, is a major public health concern in England.
Aims
To ascertain and compare views of psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists working with people with intellectual disability and/or autism on psychotropic medication optimisation for this population.
Method
A cross-sectional survey of 13 questions was disseminated online among psychiatrists and other health professionals working with people with intellectual disability and/or autism across England, using a non-discriminatory exponential snowballing technique leading to non-probability sampling. The questionnaire covered demographic characteristics, perceived barriers/benefits of psychotropic optimisation (including ethnicity) and views on implementation of a national medicine optimisation programme. Quantitative analysis used chi-squared, Mann–Whitney and unpaired t-tests, with significance taken as P < 0.05. Thematic analysis of free-text responses was undertaken with Braun and Clarke’s methodology.
Results
Of 219 respondents, significant differences in attitudes to most issues emerged between psychiatrists (n = 66) and non-psychiatrists (n = 149). Psychiatrists had less optimism of a successful national medication optimisation programme if commissioned, or achieving 50% reduction in psychotropic overprescribing and inappropriate psychotropic prescribing generally. Perceived barriers to reducing overmedication differed significantly between the psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists, Thematic analysis identified five themes (system issues, resources, medication challenges, family and carers, and training and alternatives/structure).
Conclusions
This is the first study to highlight important differences between psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists’ attitudes to psychotropic optimisation despite respondents overall being broadly supportive of its need. A major finding is the hitherto unquantified concerns of patient ethnicity and its impact on psychotropic optimisation principles.
To triangulate the perspectives of mental health clinicians, older people with mental illness and their carers on Advance Care Planning (ACP) to develop evidence-informed educational resources.
Methods
The study setting was public mental health services. Results of previously reported reflexive thematic analyses of interviews discussing ACP with three stakeholder groups (12 older people with mental illness, 5 carers, and 15 mental health clinicians) were triangulated. The emergent overarching themes were considered within an interpretive description framework to develop educational resources to support each of the three stakeholder groups to engage in ACP.
Results
Four overarching themes emerged: (i) importance of ACP recognized but ACP often not initiated; (ii) knowledge gaps; (iii) skill gaps – how to do it; and (iv) practical and process issues. Taking into account the research team’s knowledge of the local health contexts, two formats of educational resources were developed; written information sheets bespoke to identified knowledge gaps and needs for each group, and brief training films for clinicians addressing need for practical skills in ACP. The consumer and carer sheets were translated into three languages. Two brief clinician training films demonstrated introducing ACP within mental health reviews and how to address aspects of complexity in ACP with older adults with a mental illness and carers.
Significance of results
The current absence of specific educational resources for ACP with older people with mental illness contrasts with the recognized importance of ACP. Written resources were created to address empirically identified knowledge gaps and misconceptions and provide practical information and training films developed to demonstrate key skills for clinicians. The resources were made freely available, with dissemination planned to promote and evaluate use as part of a more comprehensive educational intervention. Resources supporting clinician, consumer and carer education are an important first step towards empowerment and participation in ACP.
How do legal and medical professionals construct patients’ legal status and mental states in courtrooms, and how do patients themselves shape those constructions? This paper analyzes 300 hearings in Paris and New York City where people who have been involuntarily hospitalized in psychiatric facilities ask to be released. In both cities, courts reject the vast majority of requests. They do so by drawing on the two systems’ distinctive legal repertoires and control capacity to make patients into different kinds of serviceable subjects: people whose rights are given nominal consideration in the courtroom, but who are nonetheless classified as needing the forced interventions that the psychiatric system has the resources to provide. In Paris, legal professionals emphasize procedural rights while deferring to medical evaluations of patients’ consent, defined as their underlying willingness to accept long-term treatment. In New York, lawyers challenge psychiatric expertise but bargain with doctors and patients over compliance, understood as a short-term acceptance of medication. This paper reorients attention from the self-governing subjects that hybrid medical-legal-welfare interventions claim to ultimately produce toward the more contingent and situational serviceable subjects that allow for ongoing professional collaboration and institutional processing in contexts of diminished resources and expanded patients’ rights.
Two years on from the implementation of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act (ADMCA) 2015, significant legal uncertainty persists in Ireland’s acute hospitals for the care of people who lack capacity to consent to treatment. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists must navigate a legal landscape where clear lacunae have emerged in the regulation of frequently encountered clinical scenarios. We identify three of these – eating disorders requiring refeeding, refusal of life-saving treatment, and unsafe discharges – where neither the ADMCA nor the Mental Health Act 2001 provide legal authority to intervene. In such cases, the Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court has become the default mechanism for authorising treatment or deprivation of liberty, raising serious concerns about proportionality, clinical delays and uncertainty, cost, and consistency. We also consider a fourth category of patients who require immediate life-saving treatment, and the legal status of Advance Healthcare Directives in this context. Many of the patients who fall into these categories will have an established or suspected mental illness requiring the clinical input of a consultation-liaison psychiatry team.
We contrast Ireland’s evolving capacity legislation with developments in England and Wales. Reflecting on these comparisons, we consider the proposed Protection of Liberty Safeguards may provide some clarification but also contain potential risks of becoming unwieldy and bureaucratic and still fail to provide a workable statutory basis for authorising medical treatment in acute hospital settings. A proportionate, patient-centred, and clinically usable legal framework remains urgently needed.
Mental health disorders, including depression and anxiety, pose significant public health challenges globally, and in Saudi Arabia. Despite this, psychiatry suffers from a critical shortage of specialists. This study investigates factors influencing medical students’ career decisions in regard to psychiatry, aiming to enhance understanding of, and address workforce deficiencies in, mental healthcare.
Aims
This study aims to investigate the factors influencing medical students’ decision to choose psychiatry as a future career.
Method
This cross-sectional study conducted an online survey among Saudi Arabian medical students from 28 December 2023 to 28 April 2024, employing validated questions refined through pilot testing. Participant selection included male and female students across preclinical and clinical stages, excluding non-medical students and those outside Saudi Arabia.
Result
This study explores the perceptions and interest of 430 medical students in Saudi Arabia regarding psychiatry as a career. The majority were female (69.3%), with most in their preclinical years (60.2%). Key findings include limited personal connections to psychiatry (9.5% with a family psychiatrist), and primarily influenced by medical school (55.3%) and social media (42.1%). While 65.1% perceive psychiatry as mentally demanding, uncertainties exist about career prospects and stigma persists (39.1%). Gender differences were observed, with more females (34.6%) than males (22.7%) interested in psychiatry (P = 0.014). Early inspiration in medical education significantly increased interest (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
Early exposure, personal connections and gender-specific factors significantly influence medical students’ interest in psychiatry as a career. Integrating psychiatry education early in medical curricula and addressing stigma are critical for fostering positive perceptions and attracting diverse students to the field.
Patient and public involvement (PPI) increasingly features in the shaping, design, and conduct of mental health research. This review identifies and synthesizes evidence of barriers and facilitators of PPI in mental health research within university settings. The search strategy followed PRISMA guidance and involved keyword searches in eight peer reviewed databases, grey literature, hand searching two journals, requests to national mental health organizations, and backwards and forwards citation searching. We included primary mental health studies on patient and public involvement, with data on facilitators and barriers. Data were extracted capturing author, date and country of publication, study aim, participant and research team composition, data collection and analysis methods, and levels of PPI. Quality appraisal was conducted using the CASP Checklist for Qualitative Research, with an additional item on intersectionality. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis, before holding a peer-debriefing session with a lived experience working group. The final dataset included 51 articles that were either of a qualitative design or contained analyzed qualitative data. Barriers and facilitators were grouped around the following themes: the structure of the research environment, organizational culture, and individual needs. Good practice exists, but the wider research environment and power imbalances within universities constrain PPI. For PPI in mental health research to reach its full potential, the redistribution of power, building capacity for all, the provision of safe working environments, and widening inclusion in the research process are necessary. This review involved researchers with lived experience of mental ill health.
Based on promising preliminary results from clinical trials, it seems likely that psychedelic substances (classic serotonergic psychedelics, such as psilocybin, and entactogens, such as MDMA) will be introduced into psychiatry as psychedelic-assisted therapy. This also raises a range of ethical questions that urgently need to be addressed before widespread roll-out in society. This scoping review fills a gap in the literature by providing an overview of these ethical issues using a systematic search, presentation, and descriptive analysis of ethical issues in psychedelic-assisted treatments. It includes peer-reviewed studies pertaining to human study participants and psychiatric patients (population), which discuss ethical issues (concept) of psychedelic treatments (context) in clinical trials and other clinical applications. The systematic search included several databases: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, HeinOnline, and PsycArticles. The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, was adapted for each included database. The search was completed in June 2025 and studies published until then in any language were included. After an iterative process of inductive and deductive coding of ethical issues, the scoping review comprises seven themes related to the ethics of psychedelic-assisted treatments: (1) safety and patient well-being, (2) therapeutic relationships, (3) informed consent, (4) equity and access, (5) research ethics, (6) special contexts, and (7) societal and cultural implications. The results can be used to inform and stimulate further discussion and in-depth research on the ethics of psychedelic-assisted treatments, possibly leading to more nuanced debate surrounding a safer and more ethical implementation of psychedelic-assisted treatments in the future.
This revision guide is an invaluable resource for psychiatric trainees preparing for exams. With 55 case vignettes and over 200 topical multiple-choice questions (MCQs), the content covers a broad spectrum of relevant psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, anorexia nervosa, addiction, and gender dysphoria. Case vignettes provide a focused discussion of each disorder, while strategically placed topical MCQs consolidate learning and highlight concepts across disorders. Recurring features are included at the end of each chapter, including 'Exam Essentials,' which highlight the most crucial information students should remember, 'Clinical Pearls', which provide tips for practical application, and the 'Diving Deep' section allows interested students to explore specific concepts further. An engaging and comprehensive revision resource, this will be a go-to resource for MRCPsych candidates and those taking specialist examinations.
The Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine (IJPM), a journal founded with an Irish identity, has progressed over four decades into a journal of both national and international relevance. The IJPM, now the official scientific journal of the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, works collaboratively with many stakeholders including policymakers, those working in mental health services and those who have experienced mental illness. The journal aims to publish scientific literature and research which will help service users, clinicians and mental health services, and which can inform mental health policy. In this editorial the outgoing and incoming Editors-in-Chief reflect on how the journal has developed in recent times, and how the journal can progress at a time of societal change and technological advancement.
This study explores psychiatrists’ perceptions of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) through the lens of evolutionary psychiatry, a growing field that reframes mental disorders in the context of adaptation and survival. Evolutionary theories suggest that traits associated with ADHD, such as impulsivity, hypercuriosity and novelty-seeking, may have been adaptive in ancestral environments, though they manifest as maladaptive in structured modern contexts.
Method:
A bespoke 10-item questionnaire was developed to assess psychiatrists’ attitudes following a presentation on evolutionary perspectives of ADHD by an expert. The questionnaire allowed rating in 5-point Likert fashion and was followed by a free text box for qualitative analysis. Basic descriptive statistics and One-Way ANOVA pairwise comparisons between groups was used to test for statistical significance. A p value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Results:
Forty-two participants, including 21 consultants and 19 psychiatry trainees completed the questionnaire. All participants rated their comprehension of the presentation as high/very high. Most strongly agreed that the information presented could improve psychiatry and therapeutic outcomes. However, consultants with more than 10 years of experience were less likely than trainees to report optimism about the practical applications of evolutionary frameworks. Qualitative feedback emphasized the relevance of evolutionary perspectives in clinical practice, particularly in reducing stigma and enhancing therapeutic engagement with patients and families.
Conclusions:
While the results from this study were positive, limitations include the small sample size and lack of prepresentation baseline data. However, this study has formed part of the first step in investigating the perceptions and attitudes of psychiatrists on evolutionary perspectives on ADHD.
Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are documents enabling individuals with mental health conditions to specify their treatment preferences for future mental health crises. Despite the benefits of PADs, their implementation has progressed slowly. Concerns about PADs among professionals seem to be part of the explanation. A commonly reported concern is that service users will use PADs to document extensive treatment refusals. Research has not yet explored professionals’ views on ethical conflicts arising from such refusals.
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to explore professionals’ perspectives on ethical conflicts arising from treatment refusals in legally binding PADs.
Methods:
We carried out semi-structured interviews with 14 mental health professionals working in Germany with professional experience with PADs. We prompted discussions using a case report of an ethical conflict arising from a treatment refusal documented in a PAD. We analyzed the data thematically.
Results:
Professionals described the case as extreme yet not unfamiliar. While many felt obligated to respect the PAD, they also felt inclined to override it to promote service user well-being, restore service user autonomy, and protect others. Those inclined to override the PAD focused on scrutinizing its validity and applicability, raising doubts about information disclosure, voluntariness, decision-making capacity, and PAD irrevocability. Professionals believed ethics consultation would help address the ethical conflict.
Conclusions:
Legally binding PADs can create ethical conflicts when they include treatment refusals. While the best policy response remains unclear, professionals can help prevent such conflicts by supporting service users in drafting PADs.
Over 1% of the world’s population have been forcibly displaced. Asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) are at higher risk of serious mental illnesses. Despite a high need for care, little is known about the attitudes, knowledge and competencies of psychiatrists who may treat ASR subjects.
Aims
The study aimed to identify perceived gaps in psychiatric training that could help guide medical education and policymaking related to treating ASR mental health.
Method
We conducted the first national survey of UK-based psychiatrists to assess attitudes, knowledge and competencies around treating ASR subjects. The online survey was sent to all psychiatrists (N = 18 182) and registered trainees (N = 4700) on the Royal College of Psychiatrists databases in 2022. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify the optimal factor structure underlying the questionnaire. Variations in scores on extracted latent constructs by sociodemographic and clinical variables were explored using linear regression.
Results
Data from 609 psychiatrists (77%) and trainees (22%) were included in the final analysis. We identified four latent constructs concerning perceived knowledge, positive attitudes, negative attitudes and perceived distress. Only 42% of respondents felt they had sufficient knowledge to work competently with ASR subjects, and 34.7% found the work emotionally distressing. Greater knowledge predicted both more positive (β = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.20–0.33) and more negative (β = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.26) attitudes, and was associated with less self-reported distress among psychiatrists (β = –0.34, 95% CI: –0.43 to –0.21). Female psychiatrists reported more distress related to treating ASR subjects (β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14–0.44).
Conclusions
Less than half of psychiatrists in this survey believed they possessed adequate knowledge to treat ASR subjects, and some found working with such individuals distressing. Our results suggest that these issues could be mitigated by improving knowledge related to treating ASR subjects.
Machine learning, an artificial intelligence (AI) approach, provides scope for developing predictive modelling in mental health. The ability of machine learning algorithms to analyse vast amounts of data and make predictions about the onset or course of mental health problems makes this approach a valuable tool in mental health research of the future. The right use of this approach could improve personalisation and precision of medical and non-medical treatment approaches. However, ensuring the availability of large, good-quality data-sets that represent the diversity of the population, along with the need for openness and transparency of the AI approaches, are some of the challenges that need to be overcome. This article provides an overview of current machine learning applications in mental health research, synthesising literature identified through targeted searches of key databases and expert knowledge to examine research developments and emerging applications of AI-enabled predictive modelling in psychiatry. The article appraises both the potential applications and current challenges of AI-based predictive modelling in psychiatric practice and research.
Niall Crumlish (1974 – 2025) was a profoundly compassionate psychiatrist, uniquely gifted music journalist, and cherished husband, father, son, brother, and friend. He embodied humility, kindness, and compassion in all he did. Niall qualified in medicine from University College Dublin (UCD) in 1997; obtained membership of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in 2002; graduated with a Masters degree (MSc) in Transcultural Mental Healthcare from Queen Mary University of London in 2009; and obtained the degree of Doctor of Medicine (MD) from UCD in 2014. During his clinical training, Niall spent 18 months at St John of God Mental Health Services in Mzuzu, Malawi, a country which left a deep impression on him. In 2010, Niall was appointed as Consultant General Adult Psychiatrist at St James’s Hospital, Dublin with the Camac sector where his sense of humour and generosity left a lasting impression on all who worked with him. Niall was an especially gifted writer about music with an unrivalled depth of knowledge and sensibility. He wrote voraciously for Hot Press magazine from 1993 onwards, where his contributions were widely acclaimed. Through his writings in various publications and on his blog ‘Psychiatry and Songs’, Niall created a body of work that is elegant and intelligent, eloquent and heartfelt, intimate and universal.
Clinical placements are essential in healthcare education, offering practical experience and skill development under experienced supervision. However, little research has explored the characteristics of effective psychiatry placements. Understanding the factors considered vital by psychiatry core trainees for a successful placement is crucial amid concerns about trainee attrition in psychiatry programmes.
Aims
This study aims to identify key elements that contribute to a successful psychiatric placement, as perceived by final-year core trainees.
Method
This qualitative study uses one-hour, semi-structured interviews with 15 core trainees in their final placement within the South London and Maudsley Training Programme. Interviews were guided by appreciative inquiry principles, and two independent researchers employed a classic thematic analysis method while maintaining appropriate reflexivity throughout.
Results
A central theme emerges regarding the importance of a well-designed learning environment, which includes a robust training infrastructure, psychological safety, active learning opportunities, access to role models and structured feedback. The supervisor–supervisee relationship is emphasised, with the ideal supervisor being both knowledgeable and empathetic and offering mentorship and pastoral support. These factors are key to professional growth, well-being and job satisfaction, and they are strongly linked to retention in the field.
Conclusion
Core trainees value placements that address foundational training needs and cultivate psychological safety while facilitating experiential learning. Addressing these aspects in training programmes enhances the educational experience and improves retention. Future research should explore supervisors’ perspectives and examine how to balance ideal and practical supervisory roles.
The formative years of childhood and adolescence shape the course of future mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased mental health problems in young people. This study aimed to examine changes in referrals and clinical activity in a child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) in Qatar following the pandemic.
Aims
To explore changes in referral trends and clinical activity in CAMHS, including referral numbers, reasons, sources, demographics, urgency and multidisciplinary team (MDT) allocation, comparing pre-pandemic (2019) with post-pandemic periods (2021, 2022).
Method
A retrospective analysis of referral data from CAMHS was conducted. Data were collected from the administrative paper data archived in the relevant department for the years 2019, 2021 and 2022. Referral data included: source, reason, urgency, patient demographics and outcome. Chi-square analysis was employed to compare referral trends and patient characteristics across the 3 years. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with urgent referrals.
Results
A significant increase in referrals was observed post-pandemic, with notable changes in referral reasons (increased mood and anxiety disorders), sources (increased referrals from public and private hospitals) and urgency (higher proportion of urgent referrals). MDT allocation shifted towards psychiatrists, with a decrease in joint assessments.
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on CAMHS referrals and clinical activity in Qatar. The observed changes highlight the urgent need for additional resources and services. Adapting service delivery models and strengthening collaboration between healthcare sectors are crucial to addressing the evolving mental health needs of children and adolescents effectively.
This chapter invites readers to consider how an engagement with hip-hop music and culture can contribute to a better understanding of mental health, psychiatry, psychology, public health, and neuroscience. It provides an introduction to hip-hop therapy, highlighting the use of rap by psychologists and counsellors to promote mental well-being. The chapter goes on to examine the work that the Hip-Hop Psych initiative has undertaken in advancing the role of hip-hop in primary care. With hip-hop’s pre-eminence as a global musical force, greater attention to how mental health is represented in hip-hop can provide healthcare professionals with tools to aid discussions with patients about potential trends related to hip-hop icons, such as contagion effects of suicide, self-harm, and self-medication. Hip-hop offers a platform for artists and those who embrace the culture to address their emotional experiences through rap. By exploring lyrical content, the chapter uncovers how performers express their mental health challenges and fashion resilience within challenging circumstances. It argues that attention to this material could also help identify language disturbances associated with mental health conditions, and indicates the potential gains from the use of technology and neuroscientific research to support hip-hop music interventions.
Mental ill-health has a major impact on young people, with pain often co-occurring. We estimated the prevalence and impact of pain in young people with mental ill-health.
Methods
Longitudinal data (baseline and three-month follow-up) of 1,107 Australian young people (aged 12–25 years) attending one of five youth mental health services. Multi-level linear mixed models estimated associations between pain characteristics (frequency, intensity, and limitations) and outcomes with false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Pain characteristics were baseline-centered to estimate if the baseline score (between-participant effect) and/or change from baseline (within-participant effect) was associated with outcomes.
Results
At baseline, 16% reported serious pain more than 3 days, 51% reported at least moderate pain, and 25% reported pain-related activity limitations in the last week. Between participants, higher serious pain frequency was associated with greater anxiety symptoms (β[95%CI]: 0.90 [0.45, 1.35], FDR-p=0.001), higher pain intensity was associated with greater symptoms of depression (1.50 [0.71, 2.28], FDR-p=0.001), anxiety (1.22 [0.56, 1.89], FDR-p=0.002), and suicidal ideation (3.47 [0.98, 5.96], FDR-p=0.020), and higher pain limitations were associated with greater depressive symptoms (1.13 [0.63, 1.63], FDR-p<0.001). Within participants, increases in pain intensity were associated with increases in tobacco use risk (1.09 [0.48, 1.70], FDR-p=0.002), and increases in pain limitations were associated with increases in depressive symptoms (0.99 [0.54, 1.43], FDR-p<0.001) and decreases in social and occupational functioning (−1.08 [−1.78, −0.38], FDR-p=0.009).
Conclusions
One-in-two young people seeking support for mental ill-health report pain. Youth mental health services should consider integrating pain management.