To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) frameworks emphasize transdiagnostic and mechanistic aspects of psychopathology. We used a multi-omics approach to examine how HiTOP’s psychopathology spectra (externalizing [EXT], internalizing [INT], and shared EXT + INT) map onto RDoC’s units of analysis.
Methods
We conducted analyses across five RDoC units of analysis: genes, molecules, cells, circuits, and physiology. Using genome-wide association studies from the companion Part I article, we identified genes and tissue-specific expression patterns. We used drug repurposing analyses that integrate gene annotations to identify potential therapeutic targets and single-cell RNA sequencing data to implicate brain cell types. We then used magnetic resonance imaging data to examine brain regions and circuits associated with psychopathology. Finally, we tested causal relationships between each spectrum and physical health conditions.
Results
Using five gene identification methods, EXT was associated with 1,759 genes, INT with 454 genes, and EXT + INT with 1,138 genes. Drug repurposing analyses identified potential therapeutic targets, including those that affect dopamine and serotonin pathways. Expression of EXT genes was enriched in GABAergic, cortical, and hippocampal neurons, while INT genes were more narrowly linked to GABAergic neurons. EXT + INT liability was associated with reduced gray matter volume in the amygdala and subcallosal cortex. INT genetic liability showed stronger causal effects on physical health – including chronic pain and cardiovascular diseases – than EXT.
Conclusions
Our findings revealed shared and distinct pathways underlying psychopathology. Integrating genomic insights with the RDoC and HiTOP frameworks advanced our understanding of mechanisms that underlie EXT and INT psychopathology.
There is considerable comorbidity between externalizing (EXT) and internalizing (INT) psychopathology. Understanding the shared genetic underpinnings of these spectra is crucial for advancing knowledge of their biological bases and informing empirical models like the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).
Methods
We applied genomic structural equation modeling to summary statistics from 16 EXT and INT traits in individuals genetically similar to European reference panels (EUR-like; n = 16,400 to 1,074,629). Traits included clinical (e.g. major depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder) and subclinical measures (e.g. risk tolerance, irritability). We tested five confirmatory factor models to identify the best fitting and most parsimonious genetic architecture and then conducted multivariate genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the resulting latent factors.
Results
A two-factor correlated model, representing EXT and INT spectra, provided the best fit to the data. There was a moderate genetic correlation between EXT and INT (r = 0.37, SE = 0.02), with bivariate causal mixture models showing extensive overlap in causal variants across the two spectra (94.64%, SE = 3.27). Multivariate GWAS identified 409 lead genetic variants for EXT, 85 for INT, and 256 for the shared traits.
Conclusions
The shared genetic liabilities for EXT and INT identified here help to characterize the genetic architecture underlying these frequently comorbid forms of psychopathology. The findings provide a framework for future research aimed at understanding the shared and distinct biological mechanisms underlying psychopathology, which will help to refine psychiatric classification systems and potentially inform treatment approaches.
Objective: The study aims to build a comprehensive network structure of psychopathology based on patient narratives by combining the merits of both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Research methods: The study web-scraped data from 10,933 people who disclosed a prior DSM/ICD11 diagnosed mental illness when discussing their lived experiences of mental ill health. The study then used Python 3 and its associated libraries to run network analyses and generate a network graph. Key findings: The results of the study revealed 672 unique experiences or symptoms that generated 30023 links or connections. The study also identified that of all 672 reported experiences/symptoms, five were deemed the most influential; “anxiety,” “fear,” “auditory hallucinations,” “sadness,” and “depressed mood and loss of interest.” Additionally, the study uncovered some unusual connections between the reported experiences/symptoms. Discussion and recommendations: The study demonstrates that applying a quantitative analytical framework to qualitative data at scale is a useful approach for understanding the nuances of psychopathological experiences that may be missed in studies relying solely on either a qualitative or a quantitative survey-based approach. The study discusses the clinical implications of its results and makes recommendations for potential future directions.
In the first chapter I introduce some methodological issues pertaining to the history of mental health: on the one hand, the issue of anachronism, the problem of retrospective diagnosis, on the other, the importance of maintaining intelligibility across cultures. When it comes to the ancient world, there are specific problems related to the nature of medical sources in Greek and Latin, and our limited access to the medical practices underlying them; in addition, the genre 'biography of disease' has its own pitfalls, namely those of attributing ‘essence’ to what appears, prima facie, to be most of all a construct: a disease concept or label such as phrenitis. Finally, in this chapter I consider the label phrenitis, its etymological meanings and the implications of the name vis-à-vis localization (chest? lungs? diaphragm? heart?) and mental life (mind? character? soul? mental capacities?). I also discuss the ‘Homeric’ appeal of the phrēn/phrenes, the name of the body part from which the label originates. The poetic archaism of phrēn/phrenes combined with its medical use made it both understandable as a generic term for mental life and specifically a ‘medical’ term to indicate the diaphragm, and contributed to making phrenitis a long-lasting disease concept.
Phrenitis is ubiquitous in ancient medicine and philosophy. Galen mentions the disease innumerable times, patristic authors take it as a favourite allegory of human flaws, and no ancient doctor fails to diagnose it and attempt its cure. Yet the nature of this once famous disease has not been understood properly by scholars. This book provides the first full history of phrenitis. In doing so, it surveys ancient ideas about the interactions between body and soul, both in health and in disease. It also addresses ancient ideas about bodily health, mental soundness and moral 'goodness', and their heritage in contemporary psychiatric ideas. Readers will encounter an exciting narrative about health, illness and care as embedded in ancient 'life', but will also be forced to reflect critically on our contemporary ideas of what it means to be 'insane'. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.
Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders are two new groupings in the Mental, Behavioural, or Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter of ICD-11. This chapter reviews key aspects of the two new groupings and their component disorders, beginning with a discussion of debates about the ICD-11 meta-structure, and including a review of the nosological research on anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders that is the foundation for the choices made by ICD-11. Mental disorders differ from chemical elements in important ways, and so a psychiatric nosology should not try to mimic the Periodic Table; indeed, ICD-11 takes a conceptual approach that acknowledges the fuzzy nature of mental disorders, and that foregrounds the fact that classification systems must be fit for purpose. ICD-11 represents an iterative advance in respect of Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Related Disorders that may lead to improved diagnostic practices, and so ultimately to better clinical interventions around the world.
Eating disorders are historically underserved in healthcare, but are increasingly prevalent and recognised for their high costs regarding mortality, quality of life and the economy. Those with longstanding eating disorders are commonly labelled ‘severe and enduring’ (SEED), which has been challenged for its conceptual vagueness and potential to discourage patients. Attempts to define individuals from this cohort as having ‘terminal’ illness have also gained traction in recent years. This paper is grounded in lived/living experience and relevant research. It challenges the logical coherence and utility of SEED, arguing that the word ‘enduring’ unhelpfully situates intractability of longstanding illness within patients themselves and the nature of their illness. This risks a sense of inevitability and overlooks the important role of contextual factors such as lacking resources and insufficient evidence for withholding active treatment. Recommendations suggest approaches to dismantling unhelpful binaries between early intervention and intensive support, recovery and decline.
Progress towards understanding the aetiology of major depression is compromised by its clinical heterogeneity. The variety of contexts underlying the development of a major depressive episode may contribute to such heterogeneity.
Aims
To compare risk factor profiles for three subgroups of major depression according to episode context.
Method
Using self-report questionnaires and administrative records from the UK Biobank, we characterised three contextual subgroups of major depression: postpartum depression (3581 cases), depression following diagnosis of a chronic disease (409 cases) and a more typical (named heterogeneous) major depression phenotype excluding the two other contexts (34 699 cases). Controls with the same exposure were also defined. We tested each subgroup for association with the polygenic risk scores (PRS) for major depression and with other risk factors previously associated with major depression (bipolar disorder PRS, neuroticism, reported trauma in childhood and adulthood, socioeconomic status, family history of depression, education).
Results
Major depression PRS was associated with all subgroups, but postpartum depression cases had higher PRS than heterogeneous major depression cases (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.10). Relative to heterogeneous depression, postpartum depression was more weakly associated with adulthood trauma and neuroticism. Depression following diagnosis of a chronic disease had weaker association with neuroticism and reported trauma in adulthood and childhood relative to heterogeneous depression.
Conclusions
The observed differences in risk factor profiles according to the context of a major depressive episode help provide insight into the heterogeneity of depression. Future studies dissecting such heterogeneity could help reveal more refined aetiological insights.
Traditionally, psychopathology has been classified based on the publications of authoritative bodies, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (APA’s DSM). Recently, researchers have expressed an interest in basing classification more on data, as opposed to authority. This movement led to the formation of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) consortium. Working from data, the HiTOP approach emphasizes dimensions of human individual differences that are arranged hierarchically, as opposed to categories that are arranged based on traditional DSM chapter rubrics. In this talk, I will describe the origins and status of the HiTOP approach, as well as current and future HiTOP directions and priorities.
Symptoms related to chronic stress are prevalent and entail high societal costs, yet there is a lack of international consensus regarding diagnostics and treatment. A new stress-related diagnosis, exhaustion disorder, was introduced into the Swedish version of ICD-10 in 2005. Since then, use of the diagnosis has increased rapidly.
Aims
To create the first comprehensive synthesis of research on exhaustion disorder to report on the current state of knowledge. Preregistration: Open Science Framework (osf.io), doi 10.17605/OSF.IO/VFDKW.
Method
A PRISMA-guided scoping review of all empirical studies of exhaustion disorder was conducted. Searches were run in the MEDLINE, PsycInfo and Web of Science databases. Data were systematically charted and thematically categorised based on primary area of investigation.
Results
Eighty-nine included studies were sorted into six themes relating to lived experience of exhaustion disorder (n = 9), symptom presentation and course (n = 13), cognitive functioning (n = 10), biological measures (n = 24), symptom measurement scales (n = 4) and treatment (n = 29). Several studies indicated that individuals with exhaustion disorder experience a range of psychiatric and somatic symptoms beyond fatigue, but robust findings within most thematic categories were scarce. The limited number of studies, lack of replication of findings and methodological limitations (e.g. small samples and scarcity of specified primary outcomes) preclude firm conclusions about the diagnostic construct.
Conclusions
More research is needed to build a solid knowledge base for exhaustion disorder. International collaboration regarding the conceptualisation of chronic stress and fatigue is warranted to accelerate the growth of evidence.
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) has emerged out of the quantitative approach to psychiatric nosology. This approach identifies psychopathology constructs based on patterns of co-variation among signs and symptoms. The initial HiTOP model, which was published in 2017, is based on a large literature that spans decades of research. HiTOP is a living model that undergoes revision as new data become available. Here we discuss advantages and practical considerations of using this system in psychiatric practice and research. We especially highlight limitations of HiTOP and ongoing efforts to address them. We describe differences and similarities between HiTOP and existing diagnostic systems. Next, we review the types of evidence that informed development of HiTOP, including populations in which it has been studied and data on its validity. The paper also describes how HiTOP can facilitate research on genetic and environmental causes of psychopathology as well as the search for neurobiologic mechanisms and novel treatments. Furthermore, we consider implications for public health programs and prevention of mental disorders. We also review data on clinical utility and illustrate clinical application of HiTOP. Importantly, the model is based on measures and practices that are already used widely in clinical settings. HiTOP offers a way to organize and formalize these techniques. This model already can contribute to progress in psychiatry and complement traditional nosologies. Moreover, HiTOP seeks to facilitate research on linkages between phenotypes and biological processes, which may enable construction of a system that encompasses both biomarkers and precise clinical description.
Perlson et al's editorial ‘Envisioning a future for transgender and gender-diverse people beyond the DSM’ heralds the arrival of the ICD-11's gender incongruence categories among conditions related to sexual health, brightening the spotlight on the re- (or rather de-)classification of gender-related disorders, which is a step in the right direction.
Adults with neurodevelopmental disorders frequently present to, but fit uneasily into, adult mental health services. We offer definitions of important terms related to neurodevelopmental disorders through unifying research data, medical and other viewpoints. This may improve understanding, clinical practice and development of neurodevelopmental disorder pathways within adult mental health services.
The nosological background is outlined, with particular reference to the fifth edition of the American Psychological Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the International Classification of Disease's eleventh iteration. Categorical diagnoses of antisocial personality disorder are critiqued. The question of what motivates people to engage with others, and how this may be lacking in antisocial individuals, is addressed. It is emphasised that to understand what people are like and why they behave the way they do, we need to look at both traits and values – the latter being goals that people find desirable and use as guides for their behaviour across different situations. The importance of motivation for an understanding of personality pathology is outlined in the context of a schema that re-describes PD in terms of an ‘approach vs withdrawal’ dimension that is fundamental to human motivation. Finally, the question ‘How does personality become pathological?’ is raised.
Many mental disorders are linked to personality, but this is rarely recognised in clinical practice. It is suggested here that when the links are very close, the two can be joined. Galenic syndromes are so named because Galen was the first physician to recognise the links between personality and disease.
The relationship between irritability as a subjective experience and the behavioural indicators typically used to measure the construct are not known. Its links to mood, and contextual relationships, vary with age and are yet to be thoroughly examined.
Aims
First, to interrogate the relationship between the subjective experience of irritability and mood, and that with its behavioural indicators. Second, to determine how these relationships vary with age and over time.
Method
This study examined data from a previous clinical trial of adolescents and young adults (N = 82) with bipolar disorder, who received a psychological intervention over 18 months. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires, which included assessments of irritability. Analyses of covariance were conducted to examine the interaction between mood symptoms, subjective measures of irritability, behavioural measures of irritability and age over time.
Results
Subjective irritability scores differed significantly over time when controlling for manic, but not depressive, symptom scores. Further, subjective irritability significantly differed when controlling for behavioural measures of irritability (temper outbursts and argumentativeness). There were significant interactions between scores of depressive symptoms, temper outbursts and subjective irritability with age, wherein younger participants showed no correlation between depressive symptoms and temper outbursts. In addition, younger participants showed lower correlations between subjective irritability and both depressive and temper outburst scores, than older participants.
Conclusions
Subjective irritability is linked to mood morbidity and behavioural outbursts, and these relationships are contingent on age. Our novel findings suggest that subjective irritability should be assessed in greater detail in patients with mood disorders.
Pronoia is a neologism originally coined in 1982 to describe a state of mind that is, in essence, the positive counterpart of paranoia. It is characterized by feeling that the world is conspiring on behalf of the person experiencing pronoia.
Objectives
Brief literature review.
Methods
The authors review the available literature on pronoia and present a broad overview of its description and defining characteristics. An initial search utilizing key health journal databases revealed a scarcity in available documents, therefore a generalized search utilizing the search engine Google Scholar was performed with the term “pronoia”. Relevant articles obtained from the respective bibliographic references were also consulted.
Results
The primary outcome of this work is a summary of the available literature in order to build a more comprehensive understanding on pronoia. All relevant information was collated to form a cohesive description of the condition and its characteristics. We address a gap in the literature by offering a description of the lesser prevalent concept of pronoia.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate a scarcity in the available literature describing the pronoia phenomenon when compared to its well-documented counterpart, paranoia. Further exploration into this topic is merited so as to close the gap on paranoia’s lesser-known positive counterpart. By signalling the existence of this concept, we strive to contribute to an increased identification of a concept that is many times underdiagnosed due to a lack of attention to its existence.
The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 relaxed diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, and recognised a third eating disorder, binge eating disorder. However, a large proportion of cases remain in the ill-defined category of ‘other specified feeding and eating disorders’. We sought to investigate the utility of a proposed solution to classify this group further, subdividing based on the dominant clinical feature: binge eating/purging or restraint. Cluster analysis failed to identify clusters in a treatment-seeking sample based on symptoms of restraint, binge eating, purging and over-evaluation of shape and weight. Further investigation of this highly heterogeneous group is required.
Genetic testing in psychiatry is becoming more common, but psychiatrists often receive little training in it. Given the pace of change in genetics, understanding the current methods of testing and their associated merits and limitations can therefore be challenging for some. This narrative, written for psychiatrists in the clinic, aims to cut through the jargon and describe current genetic testing techniques and their evolution from previous methods. It discusses benefits and risks of testing, how geneticists decide whether genetic variants are pathogenic, terminology found in genetic test results and how best to support patients with genetic diagnoses. It also describes methods used to study the genetics of polygenic disorders. It is anticipated this will facilitate a greater understanding of genetic testing and promote confidence among psychiatrists to discuss its clinical utility and implications with patients.