To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 6 discusses Direction Dependence Analysis (DDA) in the presence of latent confounders, that is, variables that are not available to the researcher but affect both predictor and outcome. Distributional measures of direction of dependence can be affected by latent confounders when external influences are non-Gaussian. Third moment-based DDA measures preserve their direction of dependence properties under hidden confounding provided that the distribution of the confounder is symmetric. Analogously, fourth moment measures of direction of dependence remain valid under hidden confounding when the confounder distribution is mesokurtic. In addition to their potentially adverse effects on distributional DDA measures, hidden common influences also affect independence-based approaches to direction of dependence. The presence of unconsidered confounders causes predictors and errors to be stochastically dependent. This has consequences for causal model selection. Implications of latent confounders for estimating the magnitude of the causal effect and determining its direction of dependence are described. Adjustments of DDA decision rules are presented and results of a Monte-Carlo simulation experiment are used to illustrate the performance of DDA measures under latent confounding. A real-world data example is presented to demonstrate the application of DDA and consequences for model selection when (known) common influences are omitted from the analysis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.