Group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) has been shown to improve cognition and quality of life of people with dementia in multiple trials, but there has been scant research involving people with intellectual disability and dementia. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of group CST for this population.

To assess the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention, the appropriateness of outcome measures, and the feasibility of group CST (adherence, fidelity, acceptability), as well as the feasibility of collecting data for an economic evaluation.

Participants were recruited from six National Health Service trusts in England and randomised to group CST plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU only. Cognition, quality of life, depression, and use of health and social care services were measured at baseline and at 8–9 weeks. Qualitative interviews with participants, carers and facilitators were used to explore facilitators of and barriers to delivery of CST. Trial registration number: ISRCTN88614460.

We obtained consent from 46 participants, and 34 (73.9%) were randomised: 18 to CST and 16 to TAU. All randomised participants completed follow-up. Completion rates of outcome measures (including health economic measures) were adequate; 75.7% of sessions were delivered, and 56% of participants attended ten or more. Fidelity of delivery was of moderate quality. CST was acceptable to all stakeholders; barriers included travel distance, carer availability and sessions needing further adaptations. The estimated cost per participant of delivering CST was £602.

There were multiple challenges including recruitment issues, a large dropout rate before randomisation and practical issues affecting attendance. These issues would need to be addressed before conducting a larger trial.

The aim of this study was to explore primary health care professionals’ (PHCP) experiences of frailty assessment with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) with focus on feasibility aspects.

Primary health care (PHC) is often the first point of contact for older people and assessment of frailty is therefore often recommended in this setting. There is however a lack of awareness of frailty in PHC. The TFI has been proposed as a suitable instrument for frailty assessment in PHC. It consists of 25 questions, where ten questions aim to identify risk factors for frailty and 15 questions assess physical, psychological, and social frailty. There are no previous studies of feasibility aspects of TFI in PHC.

A qualitative interview study with physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists that had used TFI in face-to-face interviews during a care visit. Interviews were transcribed and the text was thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Nine interviews were performed. The PHCPs experiences were expressed in one theme: TFI is useful and feasible but requires time and knowledge. TFI was described as easy to use and providing a holistic assessment of the patient. Using the TFI was time-consuming but provided useful information for care planning. In conclusion, the TFI could be a clinically useful tool to assess frailty in PHC. The result indicates a need of educational efforts to increase knowledge about frailty and a need for primary health care to adjust to older people in order to allow care visits to include both assessment and management of frailty.

Determine the feasibility of implementing a facility-based breastfeeding counselling (BFC) mentorship program and its effect on mentee confidence and client perceptions of breastfeeding counselling.

Mbagathi County Referral Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya

Health facility management, health workers (21 mentees and seven mentors), 120 pregnant women in the third trimester who attended an antenatal care appointment at Mbagathi Hospital and reported receiving BFC during a visit in the 2 weeks prior, and 120 postpartum women in the postnatal care ward who delivered a full-term infant and reported receiving breastfeeding counselling.

Mixed methods study incorporating online surveys, client exit interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. The 4-month intervention involved facility-wide orientations, selection and training of mentors, assigning mentees to mentors, and implementing mentorship activities.

The program successfully maintained 90.5% mentee retention (19/21) over four months. At baseline, mentees demonstrated high knowledge (94% questions answered correctly) which was maintained at endline (92%). Mentees showed significant improvement in confidence counselling on breastfeeding and infant feeding (67% at baseline vs. 95% at endline, p=0.014). The percentage of ANC clients who felt BFC gave them more knowledge increased from 73% to 97% (p<0.001). Among PNC clients, those reporting friendly treatment increased from 89% to 100% (p=0.007), verbal mistreatment declined from 7% to 0% (p=0.044), and those feeling discriminated decreased from 11% to 2% (p=0.03). Key enablers included administrative support, structured mentorship tools, and peer learning communities. Implementation barriers included scheduling conflicts, staff shortages, and high patient volumes.

BFC mentorship was feasible in this setting and was associated with improved health worker confidence in BFC. The program can be successfully implemented with supportive facility leadership, well-matched mentors and mentees, and adaptable mentorship approaches.

Young adults with a psychotic disorder often experience difficulties in social functioning. We developed a modular virtual reality treatment to improve social activities and participation by targeting common causes of social functioning difficulties in patients with a psychotic disorder (VR-SOAP). This paper details the development of this intervention, encompassing a piloting phase.

Using an iterative Scrum method with software engineers, clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of psychosis, we developed a treatment protocol along with a software prototype. Subsequently five patients with a psychotic disorder, aged 18–40, and three therapists, piloted VR-SOAP. Feasibility was assessed by means of interviews and session forms. Acceptability was evaluated along the seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (i.e. affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, self-efficacy, and perceived effectiveness).

The final protocol consisted of the following modules and targets: 1. Motivation and Pleasure (negative symptoms); 2. Understanding Others (social cognition); 3. Safety and Trust (paranoid ideations and social anxiety); 4. Self-Image (self-esteem and self-stigma); 5. Communication (communication and interaction skills). Modules were piloted by the participating patients and therapists. The modules proved feasible and showed a high degree of acceptability on all seven domains of the acceptability framework.

The modular VR-SOAP treatment protocol and prototype was acceptable and feasible for therapists and patients. The primary recommendation for enhancement underscores the need for flexibility regarding the number of sessions and the content.

1. (1) Understanding the development and structure of a novel modular CBT treatment in VR.

2. (2) Learning to use specific VR modules to target negative symptoms, social cognition, paranoid ideations, social anxiety, self-esteem, and communication skills.

3. (3) Gaining insights into the feasibility and acceptability assessments of a novel modular CBT treatment in VR.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is hallmarked by recurrent episodes of severe acute pain and the risk for chronic pain. Remote peer support programs have been shown to effectively improve health outcomes for many chronic conditions. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an online peer mentoring program (iPeer2Peer program) for adolescents with SCD.

A waitlist pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted. Adolescents randomized to the intervention group were matched with trained peer mentors (19–25 years; successfully managing their SCD), consisting of up to 10 sessions of approximately 30-min video calls over a 15-week period. The control group received standard care. The primary outcomes were rates of accrual, withdrawal, and adherence to iP2P program/protocol, with secondary outcomes identifying topics of mentorship–mentee conversations through qualitative analysis.

Twenty-eight participants (14 intervention; 14 control) were randomized to the study (mean age: 14.8 ± 1.7 years; 57% female). Accrual rate was 80% (28/35) and withdrawal rate was 18% (5/28), with 28% (4/14) adhering to the iP2P program; however, 71% (10/14) of adolescents in the intervention completed at least one call. Based on content analysis of 75 mentor–mentee calls, three distinct content categories emerged: impact of SCD, self-management, transitioning to adulthood with SCD, and general topics.

The results from this pilot study suggest that the current iteration of the iP2P SCD program lacks feasibility. Future research with the iP2P program can focus improved engagement via personalized mentoring, variable communication avenues, and an emphasis on gender.

This study aimed to examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a behavioral activation (BA) program for the bereaved of cancer patients toward reducing depressive symptoms.

The BA program for the bereaved was a partially modified version for cancer patients. This program encompassed a preinterview and seven 50-minute sessions every 1–2 weeks, using worksheets, with homework assignments each day. To examine feasibility, the completion rates of intervention and 3 months of follow-up were examined. To examine the preliminary effectiveness, psychological symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; primary outcome) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) for depression and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) for anxiety. These were evaluated 3 times: before, immediately after, and 3-month post-intervention. Non-parametric tests were used for comparison of scores at 3 time points and calculation of effect size.

Of the 42 bereaved who were contacted, 21 were eligible and 20 were participated, while 19 and 18 were in the completed intervention and completed 3-month post-intervention categories (intervention completion rate was 95% and follow-up completion rate was 90%). PHQ-9, BDI-II, and GAD-7 showed significant reductions immediately and 3 months after the intervention compared to pre-intervention, and the effect sizes were all large after 3 months, although they were less than immediately after (PHQ-9: 0.89, 0.71; BDI-II: 0.88, 0.67; GAD-7: 0.57, 0.53).

This study indicated that the BA program for the bereaved of cancer patients was feasible and effective vis-à-vis reducing depressive symptoms.

The psychometric rigor of unsupervised, smartphone-based assessments and factors that impact remote protocol engagement is critical to evaluate prior to the use of such methods in clinical contexts. We evaluated the validity of a high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive assessment protocol, including examining convergence and divergence with standard cognitive tests, and investigating factors that may impact adherence and performance (i.e., time of day and anticipated receipt of feedback vs. no feedback).

Cognitively unimpaired participants (N = 120, Mage = 68.8, 68.3% female, 87% White, Meducation = 16.5 years) completed 8 consecutive days of the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2), a mobile app-based testing platform, with brief morning, afternoon, and evening sessions. Tasks included measures of working memory, processing speed, and episodic memory. Traditional neuropsychological assessments included measures from the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite battery.

Findings showed overall high compliance (89.3%) across M2C2 sessions. Average compliance by time of day ranged from 90.2% for morning sessions, to 77.9% for afternoon sessions, and 84.4% for evening sessions. There was evidence of faster reaction time and among participants who expected to receive performance feedback. We observed excellent convergent and divergent validity in our comparison of M2C2 tasks and traditional neuropsychological assessments.

This study supports the validity and reliability of self-administered, high-frequency cognitive assessment via smartphones in older adults. Insights into factors affecting adherence, performance, and protocol implementation are discussed.