Psychological therapy (PT) along with antipsychotic medication is the recommended first line of treatment for first-episode psychosis (FEP). We investigated whether ethnicity, clinical, pathways to care (PtC) characteristics, and access to early intervention service (EIS) influenced the offer, uptake, and type of PT in an FEP sample.

We used data from the Clinical Record Interactive Search-First Episode Psychosis study. Inferential statistics determined associations between ethnicity, clinical, PtC, and PT offer/uptake. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of being offered a PT and type of PT by ethnicity, clinical and PtC characteristics adjusting for confounders.

Of the 558 patients included, 195 (34.6%) were offered a PT, and 193 accepted. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (n = 165 of 195; 84.1%) was commonly offered than group therapy (n = 30 of 195; 13.3%). Patients who presented via an EIS (adj. OR = 2.24; 95%CI 1.39–3.59) were more likely to be offered a PT compared with those in non-EIS. Among the patients eligible for an EIS, Black African (adj. OR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.25–0.94), Black Caribbean (adj. OR = 0.45; 95%CI = 0.21–0.97) patients were less likely to be offered CBT compared with their White British counterparts. Patients with a moderate onset of psychosis (adj. OR = 0.34; 95%CI = 0.15–0.73) had a reduced likelihood of receiving CBT compared with an acute onset.

Accessing EIS during FEP increased the likelihood of being offered a PT. However, treatment inequalities remain by ethnicity and clinical characteristics.

Consistent uptake and implementation of evidence-based CBT (EB-CBT) in clinical practice remains challenging. Understanding key barriers and facilitators experienced by CBT therapists is essential for developing effective implementation strategies to enhance adoption of EB-CBT practices. This study applies the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to provide a theoretically driven exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing EB-CBT reported by CBT therapists. A cross-sectional survey design incorporating qualitative open-ended questions was used to gather in-depth insights from 228 UK-based CBT therapists. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Inductive analysis identified ten barriers and eight facilitators, which were deductively mapped onto the COM-B and TDF to identify key determinants affecting practice at the individual therapist or broader organisational level. At the therapist level, barriers identified were understanding of evidence-based decision making, scepticism about EB-CBT as being rigid, based on flawed evidence, and lacking client centredness, and a preference for intuitive eclecticism. Therapist facilitators included skills in research literacy and formulation, guided self-reflection as a behaviour regulation strategy, and reinforcement through positive outcomes. Organisational barriers were limited or complex research/guidelines, difficulty accessing knowledge, lack of training/supervision, and service constraints. Organisational facilitators consisted of external monitoring as a behavioural regulation strategy, fostering communities of practice, gaining knowledge through resources, and access to training/supervision. Key perceptions as well as misconceptions around using EB-CBT in practice were identified, highlighting the need for multi-level strategies addressing both individual and organisational factors to enhance therapists’ capability, motivation, and opportunity to adopt EB-CBT practices.

As a result of reading this paper, readers should:

1. (1) Understand the key barriers UK therapists perceive as hindering the implementation of evidence-based CBT practices.

2. (2) Understand the key factors UK therapists perceive as facilitating and enhancing the implementation evidence-based CBT practices.

3. (3) Be able to use the COM-B and TDF model to map key determinants affecting adoption of evidence-based CBT practice at both the individual therapist and broader organisational level.

4. (4) Consider theoretically driven implementation interventions which could be used to target identified individual and organisational factors to improve sustained adoption of EB-CBT.

Why, What, Who, When are a set of questions, sometimes referred to as the ‘WH calibration questions’ that help interrogate a concept in terms of its application and utility. In this article these questions are used to evaluate decisions made by footballers around their mental health (MH) and wellbeing. They allow us to examine the help-seeking behaviours of footballers, such as: Why seek help? What help is available? Who to go to? When’s the right time? The article examines the psychotherapies, mainly CBT, suitable for football players and offers practical examples of how clubs have supported their players. The roles of multi-disciplinary team members involved in promoting the wellbeing of players are discussed. The content of this paper is based on a review of the literature and personal knowledge of the authors’ experiences as MH clinicians in professional football clubs.

1. (1) To show the extent to which professional footballers experience mental health difficulties, and the nature of these problems.

2. (2) To highlight the thought processes of footballers during their management of their mental health.

3. (3) To provide a description of the therapies available to footballers, and highlighting the forms of CBT in common use.

4. (4) To emphasise the need for a holistic approach to MH provision, and clarify the roles of people within football clubs who provide MH support.

5. (5) To reflect on the need for ‘in-house’ specialist mental health input within professional football clubs.

Although cognitive behavioral therapy for people diagnosed with schizophrenia (CBTp) is recommended in clinical guidelines internationally, rates of implementation are low. One consequence of this has been the development of brief individual psychological interventions, which are shorter than the recommended minimum of 16 sessions for CBTp. This article is the first to systematically identify the brief interventions that exist for people diagnosed with schizophrenia and to determine their effectiveness using meta-analysis.

Five electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials or experimental studies of brief individual psychological interventions delivered in community settings. Random effects meta-analysis was used to integrate effect sizes, due to the heterogeneity of included studies.

Fourteen studies were identified (n = 1,382) that measured thirty clinical outcomes and included six intervention types - brief CBT, memory training, digital motivation support, reasoning training, psychoeducation, and virtual reality. Collectively, brief psychological interventions were found to be effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD −0.285, p < 0.01), paranoia (SMD −0.277, p < 0.05), data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01), depression (SMD −0.906, p < 0.05) and wellbeing (SMD 0.405, p < 0.01). For intervention types, brief CBT was effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD −0.32, p < .001), and reasoning training was effective for data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01).

Overall, the evidence suggests that brief psychological interventions are effective for several key difficulties associated with schizophrenia, providing an opportunity to improve both access to, and choice of, treatment for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Because pediatric anxiety disorders precede the onset of many other problems, successful prediction of response to the first-line treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could have a major impact. This study evaluates whether structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can predict post-CBT anxiety symptoms.

Two datasets were studied: (A) one consisted of n = 54 subjects with an anxiety diagnosis, who received 12 weeks of CBT, and (B) one consisted of n = 15 subjects treated for 8 weeks. Connectome predictive modeling (CPM) was used to predict treatment response, as assessed with the PARS. The main analysis included network edges positively correlated with treatment outcome and age, sex, and baseline anxiety severity as predictors. Results from alternative models and analyses are also presented. Model assessments utilized 1000 bootstraps, resulting in a 95% CI for R2, r, and mean absolute error (MAE).

The main model showed a MAE of approximately 3.5 (95% CI: [3.1–3.8]) points, an R2 of 0.08 [−0.14–0.26], and an r of 0.38 [0.24–0.511]. When testing this model in the left-out sample (B), the results were similar, with an MAE of 3.4 [2.8–4.7], R2−0.65 [−2.29–0.16], and r of 0.4 [0.24–0.54]. The anatomical metrics showed a similar pattern, where models rendered overall low R2.

The analysis showed that models based on earlier promising results failed to predict clinical outcomes. Despite the small sample size, this study does not support the extensive use of CPM to predict outcomes in pediatric anxiety.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the population’s mental health, particularly for individuals with health anxiety (HA) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This is in conjunction with a significant change in accessibility of face-to-face psychological services which have had to rapidly adapt to the remote delivery of therapy.

Using a single-arm open trial design, the study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based CBT interventions for HA and OCD delivered via a blend of online therapist consultations interspersed with self-study reading materials. A secondary aim was to evaluate remote training workshops provided to therapists.

Therapists attended three half-day remote workshops after which consecutive participants with HA or OCD were assigned to therapists for treatment. Monthly expert supervision was provided. Patients completed routine outcome measures at each session and an idiosyncratic measure of pre-occupation with COVID-19 at pre- and post-treatment.

Significant and comparable improvements were observed on measures of anxiety, depression and social adjustment from pre- to post-treatment in both the HA (n=14) and OCD (n=20) groups. Disorder-specific measures also showed significant improvements after treatment. The HA group showed greater levels of change on the COVID-19-specific questionnaire. The training workshops were well received by therapists, who valued the monthly supervision sessions.

The study provides support for the effectiveness of the online delivery of CBT for HA and OCD supported by the inclusion of additional self-study booklets.

Economic variables such as socioeconomic status and debt are linked with an increased risk of a range of mental health problems and appear to increase the risk of developing of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous research has shown that people living in more deprived areas have more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety after treatment in England’s NHS Talking Therapies services. However, no research has examined if there is a relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and outcomes for PTSD specifically. This study was an audit of existing data from a single NHS Talking Therapies service. The postcodes of 138 service users who had received psychological therapy for PTSD were used to link data from the English Indices of Deprivation. This was analysed with the PCL-5 measure of PTSD symptoms pre- and post-treatment. There was no significant association between neighbourhood deprivation measures on risk of drop-out from therapy for PTSD, number of sessions received or PTSD symptom severity at the start of treatment. However, post-treatment PCL-5 scores were significantly more severe for those living in highly deprived neighbourhoods, with lower estimated income and greater health and disability. There was also a non-significant trend for the same pattern based on employment and crime rates. There was no impact of access to housing and services or living environment. Those living in more deprived neighbourhoods experienced less of a reduction in PTSD symptoms after treatment from NHS Talking Therapies services. Given the small sample size in a single city, this finding needs to be replicated with a larger sample.

1. (1) Previous literature has shown that socioeconomic deprivation increases the risk of a range of mental health problems.

2. (2) Existing research suggests that economic variables such as income and employment are associated with greater incidence of PTSD.

3. (3) In the current study, those living in more deprived areas experienced less of a reduction in PTSD symptoms following psychological therapy through NHS Talking Therapies.

4. (4) The relatively poorer treatment outcomes in the current study are not explained by differences in baseline PTSD severity or drop-out rates, which were not significantly different comparing patients from different socioeconomic strata.

Implementation of video call-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has increased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more flexible delivery, but less is known about user experience and effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of individual video call-based CBT for adults with mild to moderate mental health conditions (Prospero CRD42021291055). Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched until 4 September 2023. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP) assessed methodological quality of studies. Meta-analysis was conducted in R. Thirty studies (n=3275), published 2000 to 2022, mainly in the USA (n=22/30, 73%), were included. There were 15 randomised control trials, one controlled clinical trial, and 14 uncontrolled studies. Findings indicated feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness (effect size range 0.02–8.30), especially in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for military populations. Other studies investigated depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic with agoraphobia, insomnia, and anxiety. Studies indicated that initial challenges with video call-based CBT subsided as therapy progressed and technical difficulties were managed with limited impact on care. EPHPP ratings were strong (n=12/30, 40%), moderate (n=12/30, 40%), and weak (n=6/30, 20%). Meta-analysis on 12 studies indicated that the difference in effectiveness of video call-based CBT and in-person CBT in reducing symptoms was not significant (SMD=0.044; CI=–0.086; 0.174). Video calls could increase access to CBT without diminishing effectiveness. Limitations include high prevalence of PTSD studies, lack of standardised definitions, and limited studies, especially those since the COVID-19 pandemic escalated use of video calls.

1. This review assesses feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of individual video call-based CBT for adults with mild to moderate common mental health conditions, as defined by the ICD-11.

2. Secondary aims were to assess if the therapeutic relationship is affected and identify any potential training needs in delivering video call-based CBT.

3. The adjunct meta-analysis quantitatively explored whether video call-based CBT is as effective as in-person interventions in symptom reduction on primary outcome measures by pooling estimates for studies that compare these treatment conditions.

Several psychological models of bipolar disorder propose that certain types of appraisals can lead to increases in manic symptoms.

We tested whether the belief that being ‘high’ is a natural part of one’s personality and correlates with manic symptoms 4 months later when controlling for manic symptoms at baseline.

This was a prospective 4-month follow-up design using self-report measures. Forty people with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder completed a measure of manic symptoms, a measure of appraisals associated with bipolar disorder, and a single-item measure, ‘To what extent do you feel like being “high” is a natural part of your personality?’, at baseline and follow-up.

The single-item measure showed modest stability over time and construct validity in its correlation with a standardised measure of appraisals in bipolar disorder. As predicted, the single-item measure correlated with manic symptoms at follow-up when controlling for manic symptoms at baseline.

The belief that being ‘high’ is a natural part of one’s personality is a potential predictor of manic symptoms. Further research needs to study the potential mediating mechanisms such as activating behaviours, and control for indicators of the bipolar endophenotype.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) or major depressive disorder (MDD), yet there is variability in clinical improvement. Though prior research suggests pre-treatment engagement of brain regions supporting cognitive reappraisal (e.g. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC]) foretells CBT response in SAD, it remains unknown if this extends to MDD or is specific to CBT. The current study examined associations between pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal and clinical improvement in patients with SAD or MDD following a trial of CBT or supportive therapy (ST), a common-factors comparator arm.

Participants were 75 treatment-seeking patients with SAD (n = 34) or MDD (n = 41) randomized to CBT (n = 40) or ST (n = 35). Before randomization, patients completed a cognitive reappraisal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, patients completed clinician-administered symptom measures and a self-report cognitive reappraisal measure before treatment and every 2 weeks throughout treatment.

Results indicated that pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal differentially predicted CBT and ST response. Specifically, greater trajectories of symptom improvement throughout treatment were associated with less ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity for CBT patients, but more vlPFC activity for ST patients. Also, less baseline dlPFC activity corresponded with greater trajectories of self-reported reappraisal improvement, regardless of treatment arm.

If replicated, findings suggest individual differences in brain response during reappraisal may be transdiagnostically associated with treatment-dependent improvement in symptom severity, but improvement in subjective reappraisal following psychotherapy, more broadly.