Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ksgrx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-27T23:49:10.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Juristic Personhood and Property: Some Reflections on the Juridical Path of the Idol in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2025

Jaivir Singh Open the ORCID record for Jaivir Singh [Opens in a new window]
Jaivir Singh*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
*
Email: jaivirs@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article tries to understand the role of the idol as a juristic person in the Ram Janmabhumi judgment that resolved the issue of title, following from the Ayodhya dispute. I trace the link between the establishment of the idol as a juristic being and the governance of Hindu property, highlighting the point that an award of personhood to the idol is an award of rights to the community behind the idol. The details of the Ram Janmabhumi judgment show that juridically empowering the community behind the idol in an inter-community conflict has a different texture from an intra-community dispute. The implications of this are explored—first by understanding the nature of the rights created and the conflicts they generate (following the Italian jurist Sforza), and second by understanding this configuration of property rights as a positional good, positional goods being paramount in the production of an economy geared to ethno-nationalism.

Keywords

idoljuristic personpropertypositional goodsSforza

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 12 , Special Issue 3: Property Rights in India: Theory and Practice , September 2025 , pp. 346 - 372
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act (1993).Google Scholar
Allahabad High Court (2010). Decision of special full bench hearing Ayodhya matters date of judgment 30.9.2010. Available at: https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/DisplayAyodhyaBenchLandingPage.do (Accessed: 4 April 2025).Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. (ed.) (1999). Secularism and its critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. (2023). Reimagining Indian secularism. Kolkata: Seagull Books.Google Scholar
Bindal, A. (2020). ‘“Complete justice”? Silences and erasures in the Ayodhya judgment’, Journal of Indian Law and Society, 11(1), pp. 48–71.Google Scholar
Breton, A. (1964). ‘The economics of nationalism’, Journal of Political Economy, 72(4), pp. 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, A. and Breton, M. (1995). ‘Nationalism Revisited’, in Breton, A., Gianluigi, G., Salmon, P. and Wintrobe, R. (eds) Nationalism and rationality. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–115.Google Scholar
Chugh, M. (2024). ‘“16 Hindu sanskaars can sustain economy.” Indian culture is recession-proof’, The Print, 8 July. Available at: https://theprint.in/feature/around-town/16-hindu-sanskaars-can-sustain-economy-indian-culture-is-recession-proof/2164940/?utm_source=pocket_shared (Accessed: 22 March 2025).Google Scholar
Cohen, M. R. (1927). ‘Property and sovereignty’, Cornell Law Quarterly, 13(1), pp. 8–30.Google Scholar
Criminal Procedure Code (1898).Google Scholar
de Zulueta, F. (1946). The institutes of Gaius part I text with critical notes and translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
de Zulueta, F. (1953). The institutes of Gaius part II commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2019). ‘Juridical ontology and the theory of the firm’, in Gagliardi, F. and Gindis, D. (eds.) Institutions and evolution of capitalism: Essays in honour of Geoffrey M. Hodgson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K. and Pistor, K. (2017). ‘Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), pp. 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deiser, G. F. (1908). ‘The juristic person’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 57(3), pp. 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1926). ‘The historical background of corporate legal personality’, Yale Law Journal, 35(6), pp. 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhawan, R. (1978). ‘The Supreme Court and Hindu religious endowments 1950–1975’, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 20(1), pp. 52–102.Google Scholar
Duff, P. P. (1927). ‘The personality of the idol’, Cambridge Law Journal, 3(1), pp. 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1985a). Choosing the right pond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1985b). ‘The demands for unobservable and other non-positional goods’, American Economic Review, 75 (1), pp. 101–116.Google Scholar
Geldart, W. (1911). ‘Legal personality’, Law Quarterly Review, 27, pp. 90–108.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). ‘Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning’, Yale Law Journal, 23(1), pp. 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honre, A. M. (1961). ‘Ownership’, in Guest, A. G. (ed.) Oxford essays in jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 107–147.Google Scholar
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2019). 11 SCC 1.Google Scholar
Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India (1994). 6 SCC 360.Google Scholar
Keshvananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973). 4 SCC 225.Google Scholar
Marthanda Varma (Dead) Through Legal Representatives and Another v. State of Kerala and others (2021). 1 SCC 225.Google Scholar
Mehta, D. (2015). ‘The Ayodhya dispute: The absent mosque, state of emergency and the jural deity’, Journal of Material Culture, 20 (4) pp. 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Siddiq (Ram Janmabhumi Temples – 5J) v. Suresh Das & Ors SCC (2020). 1 SCC 737.Google Scholar
Metzer, J. and Engerman, S. L. (2004). ‘Some considerations of ethno-nationality (and other distinctions), property rights and territorial sovereignty’, in Engerman, S. L and Metzer, J (eds.) Land rights, ethno-nationality, and sovereignty in history. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 8–28.Google Scholar
Mukherjea, B. K. (1983). The Hindu law of religious and charitable trusts: Tagore law lectures (5th edition). Kolkata: Eastern Law House.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. (1999). ‘Is power an economic good? Notes on social scarcity and the economics of positional goods’, in Bowles, S., Franzini, M. and Pagano, U. (eds) The politics and economics of power. London: Routledge, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. (2000) ‘Public markets, private orderings and corporate governance’, International Review of Law and Economics, 20(4), pp. 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, U. and Vatiero, M. (2019). ‘Positional goods and legal orderings’, in Marciano, A. and Ramello, G. B. (eds) Encyclopaedia of law and economics. New York: Springer, pp. 1613–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pramatha Nath Mullick v. Pradyumna Kumar Mullick and Another (1925). I.L.R. 52 Calc. (PC) 809.Google Scholar
Pottage, A. (2004). ‘Introduction: The fabrication of persons and things’, in Pottage, A. and Mundy, M. (eds) Law, anthropology and the constitution of the social: Making persons and things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottage, A. and Mundy, M. (2004). (eds) Law, anthropology and the constitution of the social: Making persons and things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabarimala Review: Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers’ Association (2024). Available at: www.scobserver.in/cases/kantaru-rajeevaru-indian-young-lawyers-association-sabrimala-review-background/ (Accessed: 14 July 2024).Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. L. (1992). ‘Internal and external method in the study of law’, Law and Philosophy, 11(3), pp. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sforza, W.C. (1929). Il diritto dei privati. Spano, M. (ed.) Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee v. Shri Som Nath Dass & Ors (2000). AIR 2000 SC 1421.Google Scholar
Singh, J. and Waraich, A. (2023). ‘The governance of property: The gift economy and the Sikh Gurudwaras Act 1925’, in Nagar, R and Thakkar, H. (eds) The Indian yearbook of law and interdisciplinary studies: Pluralistic discourse. New Delhi: Routledge India.Google Scholar
Sontheimer, G. D. (1965). ‘Religious endowments in India: The juristic personality of Hindu deities’, Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (Stuttgart), 67, (I), pp. 45–100.Google Scholar
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994). 3 SCC 1.Google Scholar
Sri Ganapathi Dev Temple Trust v. Balakrishna Bhat (2019). 9 SCC 495.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1996). ‘Potential property: Intellectual rights and property in persons’, Social Anthropology, 4(1), pp. 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Hindu Bureau (2024a). ‘Gyanvapi case: SC retains status quo; Hindu worship to continue in cellar while Muslims offer namaaz in mosque and courtyard: The court ordered that the status quo would not be disturbed by either contesting parties’, The Hindu, 1 April. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/supreme-court-notice-to-kashi-vishwanath-temple-trustees-on-plea-of-gyanvapi-committee/article68015677.ece (Accessed: 23 March 2025).Google Scholar
The Hindu Bureau (2024b). ‘Vadodara housing society residents oppose allotment of flat to Muslim woman’, The Hindu, 14 June. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gujarat/vadodara-housing-society-residents-oppose-allotment-of-flat-to-muslim-woman/article68290226.ece (Accessed: 23 March 2025).Google Scholar
The Laws of Manu (1991). Translated by Doniger, W. and Smith, B. K. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, R. (1995). ‘Some economics of ethnic capital formation and conflict’, in Breton, A., Gianluigi, G., Salmon, P. and Wintrobe, R. (eds) Nationalism and rationality. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar