Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-10T19:16:03.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2025

Rana H. Shembesh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/04ftkte05 Libyan International Medical University , Benghazi, Libya
Mohammed S. Beshr*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, https://ror.org/04hcvaf32 Sana’a University , Sana’a, Yemen
Aseel A. Almasheeti
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/04ftkte05 Libyan International Medical University , Benghazi, Libya
Aisha T. Sheltami
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, https://ror.org/04ftkte05 Libyan International Medical University , Benghazi, Libya
Ahmed El-Ojeli
Affiliation:
Community Medicine, https://ror.org/04ftkte05 Libyan International Medical University , Benghazi, Libya
*
Corresponding author: Mohammed S. Beshr; Email: mbeshr2020@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Storm Daniel struck northeastern Libya on September 10, 2023, causing severe infrastructure damage and significant human loss. Derna was the most affected city, with the University of Derna suffering extensive damage and the tragic loss of 37 medical students. Medical students face unique psychological and academic stressors, and tend to have higher rates of psychiatric disorders compared to their peers of the same age. This is the first study to investigate the storm’s psychological impact on medical students at the University of Derna. The study has a cross-sectional design and lasted from February 1 to March 1, 2024. We used the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to assess anxiety and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess depression, along with sociodemographic questions in our questionnaire. We included only active students enrolled in the 7-year undergraduate program at the University of Derna. Statistical tests such as the chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used in the analysis. About 225 students completed the survey. The means and standard deviations for GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were 9.2 (3.9) and 10.8 (5.0), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety was 42.2% for cases classified as moderate and severe (cut-off ≥10). Depression had a prevalence of 51.1% for cases classified as moderate, moderately severe and severe (cut-off ≥ 10). Suicidal ideation was reported at a rate of 48.9% for “several days” or more and at 16.5% for “more than half of the days” and “nearly every day.” Internal displacement following the storm was significantly associated with both anxiety (p = 0.033) and depression (p = 0.003). However, age, gender, year of study, monthly allowance and residence status (living with family or alone) did not show a statistically significant association with either anxiety or depression (p > 0.05 for all variables). Logistic regression analysis identified gender as the only significant predictor of anxiety (p = 0.041) and internal displacement as the sole significant predictor of depression (p = 0.023). Medical students at the University of Derna reported high rates of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation following Storm Daniel. Internal displacement was significantly associated with both anxiety and depression. These results highlight the need for targeted interventions to address medical students’ mental health challenges and improve their overall well-being.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

Our evaluation of the impact of Storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna revealed higher levels of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation among them. Natural disasters can have long-lasting negative mental health effects on survivors. There is a lack of mental health-related services in Libya. This study underscores the importance of developing a network of support and resources for the surviving medical students to help them cope, receive early diagnosis and get treatment if needed, with the goal of enhancing their mental health and overall well-being.

Introduction

Natural disasters are an unavoidable global challenge. In addition to human loss and suffering, disasters negatively impact the mental health of individuals and communities (Kreimer Reference Kreimer2001; Palinkas and Wong Reference Palinkas and Wong2020). Survivors face an increased risk of severe post-traumatic psychopathologies, particularly depression and anxiety (Newnham et al. Reference Newnham, Mergelsberg, Chen, Kim, Gibbs, Dzidic, Ishida DaSilva, Chan, Shimomura, Narita, Huang and Leaning2022). These effects are often more pronounced in lower-income countries (Davidson and McFarlane Reference Davidson and McFarlane2006).

On September 10, 2023, Storm Daniel struck northeastern Libya, bringing high winds and heavy rain that caused catastrophic floods and widespread destruction. Derna was the hardest-hit city, where two dams ruptured, sweeping away entire communities and destroying over 2,200 structures (Normand and Heggy Reference Normand and Heggy2024). The disaster led to 4,265 confirmed deaths, more than 8,500 missing persons, and nearly 45,000 displaced (WHO 2023). The University of Derna, a key institution in the city, was severely affected, with the tragic loss of 37 medical students, according to an official statement from the university.

This disaster unfolded amid Libya’s ongoing recovery from the aftermath of a prolonged armed conflict, which devastated its infrastructure and healthcare system (Daw Reference Daw2017; Fitzgerald Reference Fitzgerald2023). A ceasefire agreed upon in October 2020 remains in place (Wikipedia 2024). Before the storm, a 2023 UNICEF report noted that over 525,000 people required health assistance and highlighted a critical lack of mental health services (UNICEF 2023). Derna and other eastern cities were already operating under suboptimal conditions, with only 10 semi- or fully functional healthcare facilities and multiple outpatient clinics (Fitzgerald Reference Fitzgerald2023).

Within this challenging context, medical students are a unique demographic, particularly vulnerable to psychological stressors. A longitudinal cohort study assessed medical students before they entered medical school and followed them through their second and fourth years (Rosal et al. Reference Rosal, Ockene, Ockene, Barrett, Ma and Hebert1997). Before medical school, their mental health was similar to that of the general population, but after enrollment, depression rates increased and persisted. Compared to their peers in other disciplines, they face distinct academic and psychological challenges that may contribute to higher rates of mental health issues (Wolf et al. Reference Wolf, Faucett, Randall and Balson1988). Globally, the prevalence of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation among medical students is 33.8%, 27.2% and 11.1%, respectively (Rotenstein et al. Reference Rotenstein, Ramos, Torre, Segal, Peluso, Guille, Sen and Mata2016; Quek et al. Reference Quek, Tam, Tran, Zhang, Zhang, Ho and Ho2019).

To date, this is the first study to assess the psychological impact of Storm Daniel on medical students in Libya. Our study focused on Derna University in Derna – the city most severely affected by the storm. There is a lack of studies focusing on the mental health of Libyan medical students, who face unique challenges due to ongoing political conflict. The ongoing uncertainty and instability continue to threaten their education and future.

We selected the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as our primary tools based on their well-established validity, standardized administration, capacity to classify symptom severity and widespread use across diverse populations (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Löwe2006; Löwe et al. Reference Löwe, Decker, Müller, Brähler, Schellberg, Herzog and Herzberg2008; Levis et al. Reference Levis, Benedetti and Thombs2019). Both are self-administered instruments, making them suitable for rapid assessment in a resource-limited post-disaster setting.

We included medical students from the University of Derna who were directly affected by the storm. Our aim was to assess whether there has been an increase in mental health disorders such as anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation among them.

Materials and methods

Study design, participants and settings

A cross-sectional design was conducted among medical students at the University of Derna following Storm Daniel. Data were collected from February 1 to March 1, 2024. We included only students who were actively attending the 7-year undergraduate program at the University of Derna, Faculty of Medicine, from the pre-med preparation year until the seventh internship year.

Students were asked to participate in the survey voluntarily. We used Google Forms to deliver our questionnaire electronically. All questions were presented without a skip option, ensuring that no responses were left unanswered or missing. The Libyan Red Crescent response team helped with messaging and encouraged students to participate in the survey. For those who did not have internet access, the Red Crescent team provided access to ensure more participation in the survey.

We followed the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology Statement (STROBE), which outlines a checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies (von Elm et al. Reference von Elm, Altman, Egger, Pocock, Gøtzsche and Vandenbroucke2007). The STROBE checklist of this paper is available in the Supplementary Materials.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated based on the following assumptions: the total number of medical students attending Derna University was 517, with an expected frequency of 50%, a margin of error of 5% and a 95% confidence interval. We chose 50% as the expected frequency. At the same time, we could have used the global anxiety rate among medical students (33.8%) (Quek et al. Reference Quek, Tam, Tran, Zhang, Zhang, Ho and Ho2019). However, given the unusual circumstances surrounding medical students, such as exposure to the storm, we opted for 50% as it is more conservative and represents the highest possible variability in the population (Martínez-Mesa et al. Reference Martínez-Mesa, González-Chica, Bastos, Bonamigo and Duquia2014). The minimum required sample size was 221.

Study tool

Our questionnaire was divided into three parts. The first part contained sociodemographic questions, including age, gender, year of study, monthly allowance, living status and internal displacement.

In the second section, we used the GAD-7, a tool developed to screen and evaluate the severity of anxiety disorders (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Löwe2006; Kroenke et al. Reference Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, Monahan and Löwe2007). This tool has been validated for screening anxiety disorders, with 82% specificity and 89% sensitivity (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Löwe2006; Löwe et al. Reference Löwe, Decker, Müller, Brähler, Schellberg, Herzog and Herzberg2008). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days) and 3 (nearly every day), with scores ranging from 0 to 21 (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Löwe2006; Kroenke et al. Reference Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, Monahan and Löwe2007). The combined score is interpreted as follows: 0–4 (normal), 5–9 (mild), 10–14 (moderate) and 15–21 (severe) anxiety levels (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Löwe2006).

In the third section, we used PHQ-9. This validated nine-item tool is used to screen and assess an individual’s level of depression (Spitzer et al. Reference Spitzer, Kroenke and Williams1999; Kroenke et al. Reference Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams2001). It has an 88% sensitivity and an 85% specificity (Levis et al. Reference Levis, Benedetti and Thombs2019). A 4-point scale for each item assessing depressive symptoms: 0 (absent), 1 (present for several days), 2 (present for more than half the days) and 3 (present nearly every day). A combined score ranging from 0 to 27 (Kroenke et al. Reference Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams2001). Severity was then categorized as follows: 0–4 (minimal), 5–9 (mild), 10–14 (moderate), 15–19 (moderately severe) and 20–27 (severe) (Urtasun et al. Reference Urtasun, Daray, Teti, Coppolillo, Herlax, Saba, Rubinstein, Araya and Irazola2019).

We used a validated Arabic translation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, previously tested on 731 university students, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.857 for the PHQ-9 and 0.763 for the GAD-7 (AlHadi et al. Reference AlHadi, AlAteeq, Al-Sharif, Bawazeer, Alanazi, AlShomrani, Shuqdar and AlOwaybil2017). We conducted a pilot survey with 25 medical students and found that Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83 for the PHQ-9 and 0.84 for the GAD-7, indicating a high level of internal consistency. The complete list of the questions used in our survey is available in the Supplementary Materials.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Libyan International Medical University in Benghazi, Libya (Project Number: MHS-2-O-00197; Certificate Reference Number: MDC-2024-00160). The research adhered to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring the protection and well-being of all participants.

A detailed information sheet was provided before participation, outlining the study’s purpose, the voluntary nature of participation and confidentiality and anonymity measures. Participants were informed that they could withdraw at any time they wish. Only those who electronically confirmed their understanding and provided consent were granted access to the survey.

Recognizing the potential emotional distress associated with reflecting on recent traumatic experiences, psychological support was made available to participants. Consultant psychologists at Al-Ruwaie Psychiatric Hospital in Benghazi volunteered to provide assistance. The Red Crescent team communicated information about the availability of this support and provided guidance on how to access it.

Confidentiality was strictly maintained. Responses were collected anonymously, with no personally identifiable information recorded. Each participant was assigned a unique, randomly generated ID used solely for internal tracking. All data were securely stored on a password-protected account accessible only to the authors.

Data analysis

We used IBM SPSS 29 version for the analysis. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analyses. Study variables were summarized using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), means and standard deviations. A univariate analysis using the chi-square test was performed to assess the associations between anxiety and depression and other variables. In addition, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of age, gender, year of study, monthly allowance, residence status and displacement on the likelihood of participants experiencing anxiety, and similarly, depression. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of study subjects

The Faculty of Medicine at the University of Derna had a total of 517 students. Of these, 225 participated in the study. Among them, 118 (52.4%) were female and 107 (47.6%) were male. The median age was 23 (IQR, 21–26). The age distribution was as follows: 26.6% were between 18 and 21 years, 42.8% between 22 and 25 years, 23.6% between 26 and 29 years and 16% between 30 and 33 years. Regarding monthly allowance, 50.2% of individuals received 0–75 Libyan dinars, 32% received had 76–150 dinars and 17.8% received more than 150 dinars. Finally, approximately 34.2% reported being internally displaced following the storm. A detailed representation of the background characteristics is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, N (%)

Anxiety

GAD-7 scores ranged from 0 to 21, with a mean and standard deviation of 9.23 (3.9). Based on these scores, anxiety severity was classified as follows: 50.7% of participants had mild anxiety (scores: 5–9), 33.3% had moderate anxiety (scores: 10–14) and 8.9% had severe anxiety (scores: 15–21). A detailed classification of anxiety levels is presented in Table 2 and summarized in Figure 1.

Table 2. Classification of anxiety and depression based on GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores

Figure 1. Classification of depression and anxiety based on the severity.

In a univariate analysis, we assessed the association between anxiety symptoms (defined as a score ≥10) and various factors using the chi-square test. Age, gender, current year of study and residence status (with family or alone) did not show statistically significant associations, as all had a p-value greater than 0.05. However, monthly allowance was significantly associated with the presence of anxiety symptoms. A chi-square test yielded χ² (2, N = 225) = 6.417, p = 0.04, indicating statistical significance. Similarly, internal displacement was also associated with the presence of anxiety symptoms, with the following values: χ² (1, N = 225) of 4.539, and a p-value of 0.033, indicating statistical significance. A detailed representation of the associations with anxiety is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Univariate analysis of medical students’ anxiety after Storm Daniel

Note: ¶, a p-value of less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: χ 2, chi-square test. LYD, Libyan dinar.

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine whether age, gender, year of study, monthly allowance, residence status and displacement influenced the likelihood of participants experiencing anxiety. The logistic regression model was statistically significant, χ 2 (12, N = 225) = 22.335, p = 0.034. The model explained between 9.4% (Cox and Snell R²) and 12.7% (Nagelkerke R²) of the variance in the likelihood of anxiety. It correctly classified 63.1% of cases, with a sensitivity of 41.1% and specificity of 79.2%. Among the predictor variables, we analyzed, only gender was statistically significant (see Table 4). Being female was associated with a 1.978-fold increase in the likelihood of anxiety (OR: 1.978; 95% CI: 1.029–3.803; p = 0.041).

Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of the effects of variables on the likelihood of anxiety

Note: ¶, a p-value of less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: Coef (β), coefficient beta of the variables; S.E., standard error; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ref, reference; LYD, Libyan dinar.

Depression

The PHQ-9 scores ranged from 0 to 27, with a mean of 10.76 and a standard deviation of 5.02. Based on the classification of depression severity, 43.1% of participants had mild depression (scores: 5–9), 29.8% had moderate depression (scores: 10–14), 15.1% had moderately severe depression (scores: 15–19) and 6.2% had severe depression (scores: 20–27).

In a univariate analysis, depressive symptoms (defined as a score ≥10) were not significantly associated with age, gender, monthly allowance or residence status (living with family or alone); all had a p-value > 0.05. However, year of study was significantly associated with the presence of depressive symptoms and had a χ 2 (6, N = 255) of 13.394, and a p-value of 0.037, indicating statistical significance. Similarly, displacement after the storm was associated with the presence of depressive symptoms with the following metrics: χ² (1, N = 225) of 8.953, and a p-value of 0.003, indicating statistical significance. These associations are presented in detail in Table 5.

Table 5. Univariate analysis of medical students’ depression after Storm Daniel

Note: ¶, a p-value of less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: χ 2, chi-square test. LYD, Libyan dinar.

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess whether age, gender, year of study, monthly allowance, residence status or displacement had an influence on the likelihood of participants experiencing depression. The logistic regression model was statistically significant, χ 2 (12, N = 225) = 24.081, p = 0.02. The model explained between 10.1% (Cox and Snell R 2) and 13.5% (Nagelkerke R 2) of the variance in the likelihood of depression. It correctly classified 61.8% of cases, with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 63.6%. Among the predictor variables, only internal displacement was statistically significant (see Table 6). Being internally displaced increased the odds of depression by 2.051 (95% CI: 1.106–3.805; p = 0.023).

Table 6. Logistic regression analysis of the effects of variables on the likelihood of depression

Note: ¶, a p-value of less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: Coef (β), coefficient beta of the variables; S.E., standard error; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ref, reference; LYD, Libyan dinar.

Suicide ideation

In our assessment of suicidal ideation, 115 (51.1%) of students reported having no suicidal thoughts, 73 (32.4%) thought about suicide on several days, 29 (12.9%) experienced suicidal ideation more than half the days and 8 (3.6%) thought about it nearly every day. The results of suicidal ideation are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Prevalence of suicidal ideation among Derna medical students after Storm Daniel.

Discussion

Before the storm, Libya was still recovering its weakened healthcare system from past conflicts (Daw Reference Daw2017; Fitzgerald Reference Fitzgerald2023). A 2023 UNICEF report noted that over 525,000 people needed health assistance and highlighted a critical lack of mental health support services (UNICEF 2023). Eastern cities like Derna were already operating under suboptimal conditions, with only 10 healthcare facilities being semi- or fully functional (Fitzgerald Reference Fitzgerald2023).

In our study, medical students at Derna University reported high rates of anxiety and depression. Anxiety was experienced by 42.2% of students, while 51.1% reported symptoms of depression. Displacement was significantly associated with both conditions. For suicidal ideation, 48.9% reported some level of suicidal thoughts, and 16.5% experienced them frequently.

Natural disasters have consistently been linked to increased psychological distress among college students. After the 2023 earthquake in Morocco, depression and anxiety were reported in 42.01% and 37.59% of nursing students, with higher rates among those evacuated or displaced (Achbani et al. Reference Achbani, Rida, Kharbach, Bouchriti, Boukrim and Sine2024). Similarly, the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake in Turkey was associated with elevated anxiety among students who directly experienced the event or suffered material losses (Kaya and Bayram Reference Kaya and Bayram2024). Comparable mental health impacts have been documented worldwide: after the 2015 Nepal earthquake, 43.2% of college students reported depression (Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Levin, Rahill, Baldwin, Luitel and Marhefka2021), while the 2010 Haiti earthquake saw high rates of PTSD (36%), depression (31.7%) and anxiety (21.1%) among university students (Silvestre et al. Reference Silvestre, Anacréon, Théodore, Silvestre and Garcia-Dubus2014). The 2022 floods in Pakistan also disrupted education, delaying school reopenings and causing trauma, depression, anxiety and fear of future disasters (Gul et al. Reference Gul, Khalil and Hidayat2024).

Similar trends have been observed in Middle Eastern countries affected by recent conflicts and unrest. For example, in Yemen, 48.4% of medical students experienced depressive symptoms, 34.8% had anxiety and 33.5% reported suicidal ideation (Beshr et al. Reference Beshr, Beshr and Al-Qubati2024). Similarly, Al Saadi et al. (Reference Al Saadi, Zaher Addeen, Turk, Abbas and Alkhatib2017) found that 60.6% of Syrian medical students experienced depression and 35.1% had anxiety, using the DASS-21 scale. During the recent armed conflicts in Sudan, medical students reported experiencing high rates of depression (58.3%) and anxiety (51.5%). The ongoing conflict, instability and uncertainty continue to threaten their future, with 29.74% considering dropping out and 55.56% thinking about transferring (Alfadul et al. Reference Alfadul, Alrawa, Hemmeda, Adam, Mohamed Salih Mohamed Nour, Ebrahim Hamed Saeed, Abdelmoniem Khidir Mohammed, Tagalsir, Fadul Abdalla Mohamed, Awnalla Hamid Mohammedain and Mustafa2025). Our findings from Derna, particularly the elevated rates of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation, align with the psychological distress reported among medical students in other conflict-affected regions across the Middle East.

Libya’s preexisting fragility, resulting from years of armed conflict, may have amplified the psychological impact of Storm Daniel on medical students. The prolonged conflict had already strained resources, destabilized communities and weakened the healthcare system. The cumulative burden of enduring years of instability – followed by a catastrophic natural disaster with limited support – likely contributed to the high prevalence of psychological distress observed in our study.

Psychological models of PTSD, such as the Cognitive Model of PTSD (Ehlers and Clark Reference Ehlers and Clark2000) and the Dual Representation Theory (Brewin et al. Reference Brewin, Dalgleish and Joseph1996), describe how individuals process traumatic events. These frameworks may help explain the higher rates of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation observed in our study. These models suggest that intrusive memories, maladaptive appraisals and disruptions in autobiographical memory consolidation can heighten emotional distress after a disaster. Given the extreme nature of Storm Daniel, medical students may have been particularly vulnerable due to personal losses, displacement and academic disruptions. Frequent exposure to distressing scenes, loss of loved ones or property and academic disruption may have contributed to negative changes in cognition and mood, as reflected in our prevalence rates.

Crisis theory also provides a framework for understanding how individuals cope with sudden, overwhelming stressors (WHO 2023). Initially, individuals may experience distress, anxiety and confusion. They attempt to manage the situation using familiar coping strategies. If these fail, distress can intensify, leading to psychological dysfunction. Ultimately, the crisis may be resolved either positively – promoting growth and adaptation – or negatively, resulting in a decline in mental health. Adaptation depends on internal resilience, support systems and timely intervention, with earlier support generally associated with better outcomes (Wolkon Reference Wolkon1972; Flannery and Everly Reference Flannery and Everly2000; WHO 2023). For Derna medical students, the combined stress of the storm and preexisting vulnerabilities from prolonged conflict might have overwhelmed their coping mechanisms. The absence of immediate, adequate mental health support – further strained by a weakened healthcare infrastructure – may have hindered their recovery.

In our evaluation of associations with anxiety and depression, several variables were significant. Displacement was significantly associated with anxiety and depression in our study. Over 25% of the buildings in Derna were destroyed (Eye ME 2024). About 34.2% of our participants were internally displaced, with over half of them experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety. Students were forced to take shelter with relatives in nearby cities or to rent accommodations. Multiple studies confirmed that the risk of psychological distress is higher in those who are internally displaced (Davis et al. Reference Davis, Grills-Taquechel and Ollendick2010; Morina et al. Reference Morina, Akhtar, Barth and Schnyder2018; Rizzi et al. Reference Rizzi, Ciuffo, Sandoli, Mangiagalli, de Angelis, Scavuzzo, Nych, Landoni and Ionio2022). This may explain the significant associations of internal displacement with both depression and anxiety.

The year of study was significantly associated with depression, with the fourth year showing higher rates. This may be because in Libya, the fourth year marks the transition from the preclinical to the clinical phase of medical education. A study of U.S. medical schools revealed that clinical years carry a greater risk of depression compared to preclinical years (Chandavarkar et al. Reference Chandavarkar, Azzam and Mathews2007).

Our study found a significant association between anxiety and monthly allowance, with 54.7% of those experiencing anxiety symptoms reporting “insufficient” allowance (<75 Libyan Dinar). Financial insecurity has been shown to negatively impact the mental health and academic performance of medical students (Ross et al. Reference Ross, Cleland and Macleod2006). It contributes to chronic stress, uncertainty about the future, and limited access to care, exacerbating anxiety and depression (Jessop et al. Reference Jessop, Herberts and Solomon2005; Eisenberg et al. Reference Eisenberg, Hunt and Speer2013). The financial burden may also prevent students from seeking professional help, further worsening their symptoms. To mitigate these barriers, institutions should provide free or low-cost counseling, telehealth services and peer-support networks. These support groups can reduce isolation and promote shared coping strategies.

The prevalence of suicidal ideation among medical students in our study was alarmingly high, with 48.9% reporting some level of suicidal thoughts and 16.5% experiencing them frequently. These rates far exceed those reported globally and regionally. For example, a systematic review on medical students by Rotenstein et al. reported a global prevalence of 11.1%, while studies in the Middle East and North Africa typically range from 10 to 26% (Amiri et al. Reference Amiri, Voracek, Yousef, Galadari, Yammahi, Sadeghi, Eskin and Dervic2013; Ahmed et al. Reference Ahmed, Omar and Abo Elamaim2016; Rotenstein et al. Reference Rotenstein, Ramos, Torre, Segal, Peluso, Guille, Sen and Mata2016; Madadin et al. Reference Madadin, Menezes, Alassaf, Almulhim, Abumadini, Alnemer, Alrasheed and Alramadhan2021; Beshr et al. Reference Beshr, Beshr and Al-Qubati2024; Dodin et al. Reference Dodin, Obeidat, Dodein, Seetan, Alajjawe, Awwad, Adwan, Alhawari, A, Alqadasi and Alsheyab2024). Several factors may explain the elevated rates at the University of Derna. The traumatic impact of Storm Daniel, the loss of 37 peers, educational disruption and displacement – all of which may have contributed to psychological distress. Internal displacement may exacerbate this by disrupting stability, social support and coping mechanisms. Furthermore, cultural and systemic barriers to mental health care in Libya may worsen distress by limiting access to support and professional intervention.

In our regression analysis, although the models were statistically significant, the predictors accounted for only a modest proportion of the variance in anxiety and depression (Nagelkerke R² ~ 10–13%), suggesting that other unmeasured factors likely contribute to mental health outcomes. These may include personal loss, prior mental health history, social support, academic pressure, coping mechanisms, environmental stressors or trauma exposure. Future research should incorporate a broader range of psychosocial and contextual variables to better understand mental health in disaster settings. Nevertheless, our findings highlight key demographic predictors – gender for anxiety and displacement status for depression – that align with patterns in disaster-related mental health literature (Munro et al. Reference Munro, Kovats, Rubin, Waite, Bone, Armstrong, Waite, Beck, Bone, Amlôt, Kovats, Armstrong, Leonardi, Rubin and Oliver2017; McKinzie and Clay-Warner Reference McKinzie and Clay-Warner2021). In the univariate analysis, gender was not significantly associated with anxiety. However, in the multivariate model – which adjusted for other predictors – the independent effect of gender became apparent and statistically significant.

Derna and other eastern cities were already operating under suboptimal conditions. After the storm, over 50% of these facilities became partially or completely nonfunctional, further hindering response and mitigation efforts (Fitzgerald Reference Fitzgerald2023). UNICEF, the Red Crescent, foreign aid organizations and the Libyan government collaborated on infrastructure restoration in Derna, providing medical aid, food and shelter during the early stages of the crisis.

The University of Derna housed displaced families in the initial weeks and supported survivors with care and shelter. Following the tragic loss of 37 medical students, the university promptly acknowledged the event, issued a statement expressing condolences and solidarity with the affected families, and held a tribute in their memory. It also provided emotional and spiritual supports to help students cope, as many were experiencing shock and grief. In the aftermath, the university began rebuilding its facilities and officially resumed classes on October 2, 2023 – 1 month after the disaster. To this day, they are still dealing with the consequences of the storm.

After the storm, no mental health services were available in Derna. The only psychiatric counseling for medical students was offered by Al-Ruwaie Psychiatric Hospital in Benghazi, a city four-and-a-half-hour drive. Benghazi, which has relatively better healthcare facilities, hosted the majority of displaced people and most of the medical services to survivors. No on-campus mental health counseling was established for medical students.

Libya faces numerous challenges and barriers in providing mental health support services (Rhouma et al. Reference Rhouma, Husain, Gire and Chaudhry2016; UNICEF 2023). The healthcare system suffers from limited resources, damaged infrastructure and a shortage of qualified professionals, all of which hinder effective service delivery. Geographic barriers, such as vast distances and poor transportation, further restrict access, particularly in areas like Derna. In addition, political instability and security concerns continue to disrupt service planning and delivery. The lack of reliable data on the prevalence and outcomes of mental health issues impedes efficient resource allocation and program development. Moreover, stigma surrounding psychiatric and psychological disorders remains a substantial barrier in Libya. Unfortunately, cultural attitudes and beliefs often discourage individuals from seeking help.

To address these gaps and barriers, a comprehensive policy reform is urgently needed to strengthen Libya’s health system and improve mental health services. Key priorities should include integrating mental health into primary care to improve accessibility. Training of mental health professionals is needed to expand mental health resources. Collaborating with local mental health organizations and policymakers could help increase counseling resources and establish long-term support systems. In addition, it is essential to ensure adequate funding and creating frameworks for telehealth to reach underserved areas and improve access to mental health care.

For medical students, university-based programs such as counseling services tailored to students who have experienced trauma are needed. Peer support groups that provide a safe space for sharing experiences, and affordable telehealth services, can help reduce financial barriers to care. Additionally, resilience-building programs, such as stress management workshops and mindfulness training, may promote effective coping strategies. These efforts will enhance students’ well-being and improve their academic performance.

Finally, integrating mental health education into the curriculum can foster awareness and reduce stigma, encouraging students to seek help when necessary. Nationwide efforts, including targeted awareness campaigns, are essential to normalize mental health care and promote help-seeking behaviors.

Conducting a survey in a post-disaster setting presents several ethical challenges. Although the risk of participation is minimal, the potential for emotional distress when reflecting on recent trauma must be acknowledged. Providing real-time psychological support or mental health resources is important. Ensuring participants feel safe sharing their experiences requires a thorough informed consent process, along with strict anonymity measures. These steps likely enhanced participant trust and encouraged honest responses on sensitive topics. However, we were unable to offer real-time psychological support or follow up with participants reporting severe distress due to the anonymous, online nature of the survey.

Future research should further explore the cumulative and long-term effects of conflict and natural disasters on mental health among medical students and other vulnerable groups. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the persistence of psychological symptoms and to evaluate coping mechanisms, quality of life and academic performance among affected individuals. Moreover, research should assess the effectiveness of mental health interventions tailored to these complex environments. Finally, future research should help in gathering more data on mental health prevalence and outcomes, thereby enhancing resource allocation and program development.

Limitations

Due to the cross-sectional design, we cannot establish causation from the findings. While our findings suggest a potential link between the storm and students’ mental health outcomes, this design prevents us from establishing causation. We used a retrospective self-reporting survey, which might be vulnerable to recall bias. We did not evaluate the students’ psychiatric history or the presence of any underlying mental illnesses, so we cannot draw associations. Factors such as the severity of exposure, bereavement (e.g., loss of family or friends), prior trauma and levels of social support were not examined in the survey but may influence psychological outcomes. Future research should incorporate these variables into its survey. Since this survey was voluntary, the results might be less representative due to a lack of participation. Although we provided a thorough informed consent form and ensured anonymity to build trust and encourage participation, some students may have opted out due to fear of emotional discomfort, despite assurances of confidentiality. This may have introduced a self-selection bias. Additionally, since the survey was conducted online, we may not have reached individuals from low socioeconomic backgrounds, as participation requires a smart device and internet access. Their mental health status might be underrepresented in our study. We kept the focus of our paper on the University of Derna medical students, as medical students are a unique demographic, and Derna city was hit the hardest by the storm. A study evaluating the entire youth and young adult population of Derna would also be informative. This study was conducted at a single institution; therefore, the generalizability of its findings to other universities in Libya may be limited. Finally, longitudinal and follow-up studies are needed to assess the lasting impact of Storm Daniel on medical students.

Conclusions

Medical students at the University of Derna reported high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation following Storm Daniel. Internal displacement was significantly associated with both anxiety and depression, and female gender was significantly associated with anxiety in the multivariate analysis.

There is a huge need for targeted interventions, accessible mental health counseling services, and a network of support for University of Derna medical students to help them cope with the aftermath of Storm Daniel, with the aim of improving their mental health and overall well-being.

Strengthening ethical practices in future disaster research, including embedding psychological support pathways, can further enhance the credibility and humanitarian value of such work.

List of abbreviations

GAD-7

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

IQR

inter-quartile Range

PHQ-9

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

SD

standard deviation

χ²

chi-square test

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10039.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10039.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their thanks to the Libyan Red Crescent team and the students of Derna Medical School for helping them with data distribution and collection.

Author contribution

RHS and MSB wrote the full manuscript, designed the tables and conducted the data analysis and interpretation. RHS took part in submitting the article for ethical clearance and other administrative tasks. RHS designed the questionnaire and reached out to Darna Medical School and the Libyan Red Crescent team, and distributed the questionnaire. All authors participated in conceptualization, design and analysis. All authors refined, proofread and double-checked the numbers in the final draft. All authors have read and approved the final draft for submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Ethics statement

The study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Libyan International Medical University in Benghazi, Libya. It subsequently received approval with the project number MHS-2-O-00197 and the certificate reference number MDC-2024-00160. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained beforehand. The nature of the study and how we will use the information they provide were explained to participants before they took part in the survey. All responses remained anonymous, identified only by a corresponding ID number, and were securely protected with a password, accessible only to the authors.

References

Achbani, A, Rida, J, Kharbach, A, Bouchriti, Y, Boukrim, M and Sine, H (2024) Anxiety and depression among nursing students affected by the 2023 Alhaouz earthquake in Morocco: A comprehensive evaluation. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101818Google Scholar
Ahmed, SA, Omar, QH and Abo Elamaim, AA (2016) Forensic analysis of suicidal ideation among medical students of Egypt: A crosssectional study. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 44, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.009Google Scholar
Al Saadi, T, Zaher Addeen, S, Turk, T, Abbas, F and Alkhatib, M (2017) Psychological distress among medical students in conflicts: A cross-sectional study from Syria. BMC Medical Education 17(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1012-2Google Scholar
Alfadul, ESA, Alrawa, SSK, Hemmeda, L, Adam, AYT, Mohamed Salih Mohamed Nour, S, Ebrahim Hamed Saeed, N, Abdelmoniem Khidir Mohammed, M, Tagalsir, A, Fadul Abdalla Mohamed, R, Awnalla Hamid Mohammedain, F and Mustafa, A (2025) Effect of military conflict on mental health: A cross-sectional study among the medical students at Khartoum governmental universities, Sudan, 2023. BMJ Open 15(3), e086495. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086495Google Scholar
AlHadi, AN, AlAteeq, DA, Al-Sharif, E, Bawazeer, HM, Alanazi, H, AlShomrani, AT, Shuqdar, RM and AlOwaybil, R (2017) An arabic translation, reliability, and validation of Patient Health Questionnaire in a Saudi sample. Annals of General Psychiatry 16(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-017-0155-1Google Scholar
Amiri, L, Voracek, M, Yousef, S, Galadari, A, Yammahi, S, Sadeghi, MR, Eskin, M and Dervic, K (2013) Suicidal behavior and attitudes among medical students in the United Arab Emirates. Crisis 34(2), 116123. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000170Google Scholar
Beshr, MS, Beshr, IA and Al-Qubati, H (2024) The prevalence of depression and anxiety among medical students in Yemen: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Affective Disorders 352, 366370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.080Google Scholar
Brewin, CR, Dalgleish, T and Joseph, S (1996) A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review 103(4), 670686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.670Google Scholar
Chandavarkar, U, Azzam, A and Mathews, CA (2007) Anxiety symptoms and perceived performance in medical students. Depression and Anxiety 24(2), 103111. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20185Google Scholar
Davidson, JR and McFarlane, AC (2006) The extent and impact of mental health problems after disaster. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67(Suppl 2), 914Google Scholar
Davis, TE 3rd, Grills-Taquechel, AE and Ollendick, TH (2010) The psychological impact from hurricane Katrina: Effects of displacement and trauma exposure on university students. Behavior Therapy 41(3), 340349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2009.09.004Google Scholar
Daw, MA (2017) Libyan healthcare system during the armed conflict: Challenges and restoration. African Journal of Emergency Medicine 7(2), 4750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.04.010Google Scholar
Dodin, Y, Obeidat, N, Dodein, R, Seetan, K, Alajjawe, S, Awwad, M, Adwan, M, Alhawari, A, A, AL, Alqadasi, AA and Alsheyab, G (2024) Mental health and lifestyle-related behaviors in medical students in a Jordanian University, and variations by clerkship status. BMC Medical Education 24(1), 1283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06273-6Google Scholar
Ehlers, A and Clark, DM (2000) A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 38(4), 319345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0Google Scholar
Eisenberg, D, Hunt, J and Speer, N (2013) Mental health in American colleges and universities: Variation across student subgroups and across campuses. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 201(1), 6067. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827ab077Google Scholar
Eye ME (2024) Libya floods: One quarter of buildings in city of Derna destroyed. Available at https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/libya-floods-derna-one-quarter-buildings-destroyed (accessed 13 May 2024).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M (2023) Rebuilding Libya’s Health-Care System. Available at https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/rebuilding-libyas-health-care-system (accessed 28 February 2025).Google Scholar
Flannery, RB and Everly, GS (2000) Crisis intervention: A review. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health 2(2), 119126.Google Scholar
Gul, S, Khalil, I and Hidayat, K (2024) Impact of 2022 flood on girls’ education: A case study of District Nowshera, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 114, 104988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104988Google Scholar
Jessop, DC, Herberts, C and Solomon, L (2005) The impact of financial circumstances on student health. British Journal of Health Psychology 10(Pt 3), 421439. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705x25480Google Scholar
Kaya, M and Bayram, SS (2024) Determining the impact of earthquakes on university students’ hope and anxiety levels. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 110, 104637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104637Google Scholar
Kreimer, A (2001) Social and economic impacts of natural disasters. International Geology Review 43(5), 401405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206810109465021Google Scholar
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL and Williams, JB (2001) The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16(9), 606613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xGoogle Scholar
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, Monahan, PO and Löwe, B (2007) Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine 146(5), 317325. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004Google Scholar
Levis, B, Benedetti, A and Thombs, BD (2019) Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: Individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ 365, l1476. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1476Google Scholar
Löwe, B, Decker, O, Müller, S, Brähler, E, Schellberg, D, Herzog, W and Herzberg, PY (2008) Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care 46(3), 266274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093Google Scholar
Madadin, M, Menezes, RG, Alassaf, MA, Almulhim, AM, Abumadini, MS, Alnemer, FA, Alrasheed, FR and Alramadhan, AK (2021) Suicidal ideation among medical students in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Crisis 42(4), 278283. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000720Google Scholar
Martínez-Mesa, J, González-Chica, DA, Bastos, JL, Bonamigo, RR and Duquia, RP (2014) Sample size: How many participants do I need in my research? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 89(4), 609615. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705Google Scholar
McKinzie, AE and Clay-Warner, J (2021) The gendered effect of disasters on mental health: A systematic review. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters 39(2), 227262. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702103900202Google Scholar
Morina, N, Akhtar, A, Barth, J and Schnyder, U (2018) Psychiatric disorders in refugees and internally displaced persons after forced displacement: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry 9, 433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00433Google Scholar
Munro, A, Kovats, RS, Rubin, GJ, Waite, TD, Bone, A, Armstrong, B, Waite, TD, Beck, CR, Bone, A, Amlôt, R, Kovats, RS, Armstrong, B, Leonardi, G, Rubin, GJ and Oliver, I (2017) Effect of evacuation and displacement on the association between flooding and mental health outcomes: A cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data. The Lancet Planetary Health 1(4), e134e141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30047-5Google Scholar
Newnham, EA, Mergelsberg, ELP, Chen, Y, Kim, Y, Gibbs, L, Dzidic, PL, Ishida DaSilva, M, Chan, EYY, Shimomura, K, Narita, Z, Huang, Z and Leaning, J (2022) Long term mental health trajectories after disasters and pandemics: A multilingual systematic review of prevalence, risk and protective factors. Clinical Psychology Review 97, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102203Google Scholar
Normand, JCL and Heggy, E (2024) Assessing flash flood erosion following storm Daniel in Libya. Nature Communications 15(1), 6493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49699-8Google Scholar
Palinkas, LA and Wong, M (2020) Global climate change and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology 32, 1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023Google Scholar
Quek, TT, Tam, WW, Tran, BX, Zhang, M, Zhang, Z, Ho, CS and Ho, RC (2019) The global prevalence of anxiety among medical students: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152735Google Scholar
Rhouma, AH, Husain, N, Gire, N and Chaudhry, IB (2016) Mental health services in Libya. BJPsych International 13(3), 7071. https://doi.org/10.1192/s2056474000001288Google Scholar
Rizzi, D, Ciuffo, G, Sandoli, G, Mangiagalli, M, de Angelis, P, Scavuzzo, G, Nych, M, Landoni, M and Ionio, C (2022) Running away from the war in Ukraine: The impact on mental health of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees in transit in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416439Google Scholar
Rosal, MC, Ockene, IS, Ockene, JK, Barrett, SV, Ma, Y and Hebert, JR (1997) A longitudinal study of students’ depression at one medical school. Academic Medicine 72(6), 542546. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199706000-00022Google Scholar
Ross, S, Cleland, J and Macleod, MJ (2006) Stress, debt and undergraduate medical student performance. Medical Education 40(6), 584589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02448.xGoogle Scholar
Rotenstein, LS, Ramos, MA, Torre, M, Segal, JB, Peluso, MJ, Guille, C, Sen, S and Mata, DA (2016) Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 316(21), 22142236. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17324Google Scholar
Sharma, V, Levin, BL, Rahill, GJ, Baldwin, JA, Luitel, A and Marhefka, SL (2021) Post-earthquake self-reported depressive symptoms and post-traumatic stress disorder and their correlates among college-youths in Kathmandu, Nepal. The Psychiatric Quarterly 92(4), 15951609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09928-5Google Scholar
Silvestre, G, Anacréon, P, Théodore, M, Silvestre, E and Garcia-Dubus, E (2014) Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in Haitian students. Psychology 05, 849858. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.58096Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Kroenke, K and Williams, JB (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA 282(18), 17371744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Kroenke, K, Williams, JB and Löwe, B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine 166(10), 10921097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092Google Scholar
UNICEF (2023) Humanitarian Needs Overview, Libya. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/131901/file/2023-HAC-Libya.pdf (accessed 28 February 2025).Google Scholar
Urtasun, M, Daray, FM, Teti, GL, Coppolillo, F, Herlax, G, Saba, G, Rubinstein, A, Araya, R and Irazola, V (2019) Validation and calibration of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Argentina. BMC Psychiatry 19(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2262-9Google Scholar
von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, Pocock, SJ, Gøtzsche, PC and Vandenbroucke, JP (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335(7624), 806808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.ADGoogle Scholar
WHO (2023) Libya: “A Disaster of Epic Proportions”. Available at https://www.emro.who.int/libya-floods/index.html (accessed 30 March 2025).Google Scholar
Wikipedia (2024) Libyan Peace Process. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libyan_peace_process&oldid=1221446081 (accessed 28 February 2025).Google Scholar
Wolf, TM, Faucett, JM, Randall, HM and Balson, PM (1988) Graduating medical students’ ratings of stresses, pleasures, and coping strategies. Journal of Medical Education 63(8), 636642. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198808000-00008Google Scholar
Wolkon, GH (1972) Crisis theory, the application for treatment, and dependency. Comprehensive Psychiatry 13(5), 459464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(72)90087-9Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, N (%)

Figure 1

Table 2. Classification of anxiety and depression based on GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores

Figure 2

Figure 1. Classification of depression and anxiety based on the severity.

Figure 3

Table 3. Univariate analysis of medical students’ anxiety after Storm Daniel

Figure 4

Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of the effects of variables on the likelihood of anxiety

Figure 5

Table 5. Univariate analysis of medical students’ depression after Storm Daniel

Figure 6

Table 6. Logistic regression analysis of the effects of variables on the likelihood of depression

Figure 7

Figure 2. Prevalence of suicidal ideation among Derna medical students after Storm Daniel.

Supplementary material: File

Shembesh et al. supplementary material

Shembesh et al. supplementary material
Download Shembesh et al. supplementary material(File)
File 386.2 KB

Author comment: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Dr. Judith Bass, Editor-in-Chief,

We are writing to resubmit our original research article titled “The Psychological Impact of Storm Daniel on Medical Students at the University of Derna in Libya: A Cross-Sectional Study” for consideration for publication in your journal. We previously submitted this paper, and as per your suggestion, we have addressed all the reviewer comments in the revised manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to revise our work.

In this revised version, we have responded to each of the reviewers’ comments point by point. We have provided detailed responses to the reviewers‘ comments and have incorporated the necessary changes into the manuscript. For your convenience, we have attached our point-by-point responses for review. The reviewers’ feedback has been invaluable, and it has strengthened the manuscript overall.

The major changes to the manuscript include the addition of a regression analysis on both anxiety and depression. We have expanded the discussion to provide additional context from similar disasters and settings. Furthermore, we have included a summary of the response to the disaster, including whether any mental health services were provided, how the tragic loss of the 37 students was managed, and highlighted the remaining gaps in the response. We have also offered detailed suggestions for interventions and policy improvements.

The manuscript has not been previously published by any means, nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere. We have carefully reviewed your submission guidelines and policies and ensured that the manuscript adheres to the required formatting and ethical standards. All authors have read and approved the paper to be submitted to your journal. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

We appreciate your consideration of our revised manuscript and look forward to your decision.

Sincerely,

On behalf of authors,

Mohammed S. Beshr

Review: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is a well-written research paper. The methodology is clearly articulated and thoroughly analysed, and the results section is informative and insightful.

Overall, the quality of the work is commendable, and I believe this research deserves to be published.

Review: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript. It contains valuable insights on an under-researched area. Previous revisions have significantly improved the manuscript. With some minor revisions, I would recommend it for publication. Below are some of my comments to improve the conciseness and clarity of your research with a section-by-section breakdown:

1. Introduction:

The transition between the discussion of natural disasters and Libya’s recovery from the aftermath of the armed conflict could be strengthened. The transition to medical students being a unique demographic from the previous points could be strengthened as well. I also recommend including a brief explanation as to why you chose those specific study tools over others. It would also be helpful to explicitly state the inclusion criteria for participants in the study.

2. Discussion:

Overall, the organization of the discussion section felt relatively staggered. 205-207 could be better suited for the introduction section. 298-302 (touching on university response to loss of students) may be better suited for the introduction. Furthermore, the transition to 307-320 (policy and intervention recommendations) could be improved upon. 321-324 (the need for longitudinal studies) could benefit from a brief discussion on areas of further exploration, or these points could be integrated into the limitations section.

In addition, it would be helpful to discuss whether your findings are consistent with other studies similar in nature. While similar studies were mentioned, this section would benefit from an additional explanatory sentence connecting your findings to theirs.

The discussion of psychological models of PTSD and Crisis Theory is very interesting. Those sections would benefit from a more in-depth connection to the findings from your study.

While highlighted in the introductory sentence, the discussion section could benefit from a more in-depth analysis of how the armed conflict, combined with natural disasters, contributed to the psychological impact on medical students. For example, drawing on cases involving armed conflict and natural disasters impacting mental health outcomes, such as Syria (which was mentioned in the introduction, but the parallels could be clarified). It was suggested in the introduction that armed conflict could exacerbate disaster vulnerability, leading to weakened health infrastructure and poor mental health outcomes. This seemed like an interesting observation that could either be expanded upon or an area for further research.

In terms of the comparisons with findings from similar studies in other regions (i.e. the Middle East), also specify what makes Libya and Storm Daniel unique from those cases. This point could also be an area of further exploration for longitudinal studies or future research.

In terms of the recommendations for interventions, the discussion could benefit from touching upon questions such as: 1) What barriers and challenges would need to be overcome? and 2) What are the current legal, health policy and frameworks in place that require improvements based on your findings?

I encourage you to consider the recommendations to strengthen your manuscript. Overall, I see great potential and am very appreciative of your important work.

Review: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is an interesting study that addresses the acute psychological effects of a natural disaster in a politically fragile and under-resourced setting. The authors offer original data from a highly affected population. A few areas of concern.

I would like to know if factors like exposure severity, loss of family/friends, prior trauma, or social support were considered in the study. This will be very important for the relevance of the study. These omitted variables may have stronger explanatory power for psychological distress than demographic factors alone.

The study currently has low explanatory power. The logistic regression models for both anxiety and depression explained only ~10–13% of variance (Nagelkerke R²), indicating that most predictors of mental health outcomes remain unmeasured.

The categorization in the analysis needs to be reassessed. Income brackets (e.g., <75 LYD, 76–150 LYD, >150 LYD) may lack real-world interpretability or purchasing power context, and the meaning of “sufficient income” could vary.

Some variables were significant in univariate analysis but not in logistic regression, suggesting potential multicollinearity or inadequate adjustment. Consider including effect sizes or confidence intervals in the regression results within the main text, not only in tables.

There are several typographical errors in the manuscript. Also, there was the inconsistency in tense. Occasionally the manuscript flips between past and present tenses. Standardize to past tense for completed research.

Table 6 is mislabeled (“Logistic regression analysis of the effects of variables on the likelihood of anxiety”) but discusses depression.

Some repetitive phrasing and awkward sentence structures appear throughout (e.g., “The storm may have compounded these difficulties...” appears redundant given earlier sentences). A language edit would enhance readability.

Recommendation: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Dr. Judith Bass,

We are writing to resubmit our original research article titled “The Psychological Impact of Storm Daniel on Medical Students at the University of Derna in Libya: A Cross-Sectional Study” for consideration for publication in your journal. We have addressed all the reviewer comments in the revised manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to revise our work.

In this revised version, we have responded to each of the reviewers’ comments point by point. We have provided detailed responses to the reviewers‘ comments and have incorporated the necessary changes into the manuscript. For your convenience, we have attached our point-by-point responses for review. The reviewers’ feedback has been invaluable, and it has strengthened the manuscript overall.

The major changes to the manuscript include the addition of a regression analysis on both anxiety and depression. We have expanded the discussion to provide additional context from similar disasters and settings. Furthermore, we have included a summary of the response to the disaster, including whether any mental health services were provided, and highlighted the remaining gaps in the response. We have also offered detailed suggestions for interventions and policy improvements.

The manuscript has not been previously published by any means, nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere. We have carefully reviewed your submission guidelines and policies and ensured that the manuscript adheres to the required formatting and ethical standards. All authors have read and approved the paper to be submitted to your journal. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

We appreciate your consideration of our revised manuscript and look forward to your decision.

Sincerely,

On behalf of authors,

Mohammed S. Beshr,

Review: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Thank you for the opportunity to review the paper. There has been significant improvements since the last revision. I’ve provided some minor recommendations for revision below.

On line 78 describing the selection criteria why GAD-7 and PHQ-9, the term “good psychometric properties” was used. What does “good” mean? Use more quantifiable terminology and criterion such as reliability, validity, standardized administration, and normative data. While these psychometric properties are implied in subsequent sentences, they should be explicitly stated here for clarity and cohesion.

The discussion of ethics should be included in both the main body of the paper and the ethical considerations section at the end. It would be helpful for the discussion of ethics, informed consent, and confidentiality to be interwoven throughout the paper. The paper could benefit from an explanation on how the research conducted adheres to ethical guidelines, outlining the consent process and how it was obtained from participants, and the measures taken to protect participants’ identities and ensure safe storage and handling of data. In addition to potential strengths and limitations of the approaches taken. This can be included in the methods section to describe the processes and measures used, in the discussion section as a reflection on challenges encountered during the research and steps taken to address them, and in the conclusion to reinforce the importance of ethical research—which further enhances the credibility of the findings.

There are some minor grammatical and spelling errors in the discussion section that could benefit from further edits. Overall, this paper has great potential.

Recommendation: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R2/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R2/PR12

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

No further comments for revision. Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript.

Recommendation: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R2/PR13

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The psychological impact of storm Daniel on medical students at the University of Derna in Libya: A cross-sectional study — R2/PR14

Comments

No accompanying comment.