Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-fn92c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-08T09:51:09.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New prehistoric occupations identified in the eastern Iberian Plateau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2025

Francisco Javier Aragoncillo*
Affiliation:
International Doctoral School (EIDUNED), National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, UNED, Madrid, Spain
Juan Marín
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, UNED, Madrid, Spain Institut de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social dels Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain
Cecilia Bascuñán-López
Affiliation:
Faculty of Geography and History, UNED, Madrid, Spain
Carlos Tabernero-Galán
Affiliation:
ARECO Experimental Archaeology Group, Soria, Spain
Luis Luque
Affiliation:
Boscalia Technologies, Madrid, Spain Department of History and Philosophy, Area of Prehistory, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Manuel Alcaraz-Castaño
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy, Area of Prehistory, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
José-Manuel Maíllo-Fernández
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, UNED, Madrid, Spain Institute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), University of Alcalá and Archaeological and Paleontological Museum of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Francisco Javier Aragoncillo jarrio70@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors present results of a recent project that challenges the perceived absence of Late Pleistocene human settlements in high-altitude areas of inland Spain. Despite the apparent geographic and bioclimatic constraints, these areas may contain archaeological material from diverse prehistoric periods.

Information

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction and objectives

Evidence of Late Pleistocene (c. 120–11.7 ka cal BP) human activity in the interior of the Iberian Peninsula, particularly during the initial and middle phases of the Upper Palaeolithic (c. 45–20 ka cal BP), has been historically scarce (Delibes de Castro & Díez Martín Reference Delibes de Castro, Díez Martín, Delibes and Díez2006; Alcaraz-Castaño Reference Alcaraz-Castaño2023). This dearth of material is interpreted as an effective absence of occupation during these periods and is proposed to result from both the continental climate of inland Iberia (dominated by the northern and southern sub-plateaus, separated by the Central System mountain range) and the high altitude, averaging 600masl (metres above sea level) (Straus Reference Straus2018). Yet, recent research suggests that, at least for some areas surrounding the Central System range, the lack of data may actually reflect research biases or geomorphological factors (Alcaraz-Castaño Reference Alcaraz-Castaño2023; Sala et al. Reference Sala2024).

Around the Tajo-Ebro interfluve in the Castilian branch of the Iberian System range (Figure 1), averaging an altitude of 1200masl with minimum temperatures below zero degree centigrade for five months each year (Aupí Reference Aupí2021), the archaeological record for the Palaeolithic is particularly scarce. Besides the Upper Palaeolithic cave art sites of Los Casares and la Hoz (Alcolea-González & Balbín-Behrmann Reference Alcolea-González, Balbín, Escobar and Rodríguez Alvarez2013), Pleistocene sites with secure stratigraphy were unknown in this area until the recent discovery of Charco Verde II. At this site, a sequence of occupations has been uncovered, spanning the entire Magdalenian sequence and the Last Glacial Maximum (21.4–15.1 ka cal BP) (Aragoncillo-del Río et al. Reference Aragoncillo-del Río2023).

Figure 1. Study area in the Iberian Peninsula (A) with a relief map (B) showing the hydrographic network and the known (red) and newly identified sites (yellow) (modified from MDT05-cob1 2008-2015 CC-BY 4.0 scne.es; figure by authors).

Our main objective was to test whether this region, despite its harsh environmental conditions, could host a recurrent human habitation during the Late Pleistocene, as is attested in other inland territories and suggested by the Charco Verde II data. With that aim, our research project, based on systematic prospecting and selective excavation surveys, was intended to obtain new evidence of human occupations in the study region.

Results

Cueva Grande (Selas)

This site is halfway up the hillside at the headwaters of the Arandilla River in Jurassic limestone and dolomite cliffs at 1250masl. The single-room cavity, which is approximately 22m wide by 17m deep with a maximum height of 4m, was previously used as a sheepfold, until the twentieth century.

We excavated five square metres (five areas of 1m2 each) between 2022 and 2023. A discontinuous stratum, identified towards the cave entrance, yielded a small flint assemblage, a few faunal remains and some charcoal. Radiocarbon dating was carried out on two samples, one on charcoal (Pinus sp.) and another on an unidentified bone fragment. Results suggest a late Magdalenian chronology (Table 1), consistent with the high proportion of backed bladelets in the lithic assemblage (Figure 2).

Table 1. Radiocarbon determinations for Cueva Grande, calibrated in OxCal 4.4 using IntCal20.

Figure 2. Exterior (A) and interior (B) views of Cueva Grande; C) S1 north-east stratigraphic profile; D) plan showing test pits; E) lithic artefacts (1, large blade; 2, retouched blade; 3 & 4, microgravettes) (figure by authors).

El Bosque (Anguita)

A shelter located on the right bank of the Val de Rata stream, cut into sandstone of the Buntsandstein facies, was also used as a sheepfold. The shelter faces east and has a surface area of   about 40m2. Two square metres were excavated in a central area, where we found a single, superficial archaeological level. The associated lithic debitage and faunal remains do not allow for much chrono-cultural precision. The lithic assemblage, with only one retouched piece and 212 fragments related to blade production, points to a short-term occupation, possibly between the final Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic (c. 12.5–4.5 ka Cal BP) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. El Bosque Shelter: A) interior view; B) bottom of test pit 2; C) plan and elevations; D) lithic artefacts (1 & 3, bladelets; 2, retouched bladelet) (figure by authors).

Ciño Negro (Zaorejas)

Located in Upper Cretaceous limestones on the left bank of the Ciño Negro River, near its confluence with the Tagus River, this shelter faces south-east and contains the remains of a possible sheepfold. One square metre was excavated in the central outer part, where we identified four stratigraphic levels in a 0.7m-deep section. Of these, only level 1 contains archaeological remains.

A combustion area measuring 0.4 × 0.45m was recorded in level 1, containing a burin on a truncation and abundant charcoal fragments. The type and size of the burin points either to a final moment of the Upper Palaeolithic or to the Early Holocene (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Ciño Negro shelter: A) interior view; B) location of the combustion area (red outline), after excavation of layer 2 of level 1; C) stratigraphy of the test pit, showing the combustion area in level 1 (dashed line); D) flint burin on truncation (figure by authors).

La Vega de Albarcaz (Prados Redondos)

The site is situated on a fluvial terrace of about 40ha at 1144masl on the right bank of the Gallo River, a tributary of the Tagus, 20–23m above the current riverbed. An extensive surface survey of the terrace recovered an assemblage of 36 lithic pieces on flint (65%) and quartzite (35%). The material shows different degrees of abrasion and its chrono-cultural homogeneity cannot be assured. However, technological and typological features of the assemblage—including discoid and Levallois knapping methods, as well as the presence of sidescrapers and denticulates—strongly suggest a Middle Palaeolithic (c. 300–40 ka BP) attribution (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Vega de Albarcaz: A) quartzite artefacts (1, Levallois core; 2, discoid core; 3, naturally backed knife); B) view of the site from the east (figure by authors).

Prospects

Although our results are preliminary, they suffice to verify the potential of the study area and provide further support for the hypothesis that Late Pleistocene human occupation in the region was more prevalent than traditionally assumed (e.g. Aragoncillo-del Río et al. Reference Aragoncillo-del Río2023). This aligns with recent findings in other areas of the central Iberian Meseta that were once thought to have been uninhabited for extended periods of the Upper Palaeolithic (Alcaraz-Castaño et al. Reference Alcaraz-Castaño2021; Sala et al. Reference Sala2024). In addition, results from Anguita, and potentially Ciño Negro, indicate early Holocene occupations, which are equally scarce in the area.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Heritage Service of the Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha for granting the prospection and excavation permits.

Funding statement

This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 805478; MULTIPALEOIBERIA project), the Research Plan of the Faculty of Geography and History of UNED, the Department of Prehistory and Archaeology of UNED, and by the researchers’ own funds.

References

Alcaraz-Castaño, M. 2023. MULTIPALEOIBERIA: hacia un nuevo escenario sobre las dinámicas de poblamiento y adaptaciones culturales de los últimos neandertales y primeros humanos modernos en el interior de la península ibérica. Trabajos de Prehistoria 80. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2023.12318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcaraz-Castaño, M. et al. 2021. First modern human settlement recorded in the Iberian hinterland occurred during Heinrich Stadial 2 within harsh environmental conditions. Scientific Reports 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94408-w CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcolea-González, J.J. & Balbín, R.. 2013. El Arte rupestre Paleolítico del interior peninsular, in Escobar, I. & Rodríguez Alvarez, B. (ed.) Arte sin artistas, una mirada al Paleolítico. Madrid: Museo Arqueológico Regional: 187207.Google Scholar
Aragoncillo-del Río, J. et al. 2023. Human occupations of upland and cold environments in inland Spain during the Last Glacial Maximum and Heinrich Stadial 1: the new Magdalenian sequence of Charco Verde II. PLoS ONE 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291516 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aupí, V. 2021. El triángulo de hielo. Teruel, Calamocha, Molina de Aragón. Estudio climático del Polo del Frío español. Teruel: Dobleuve Comunicación.Google Scholar
Delibes de Castro, G. & Díez Martín, F.. 2006. ¿Una Meseta desolada? Estado actual de la investigación sobre el Paleolítico Superior en las regiones interiores de la Península Ibérica, in Delibes, G. & Díez, F. (ed.) El Paleolítico Superior en la Meseta Norte española (Studia Archaeologica 94): 1140. Valladolid: Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Sala, N. et al. 2024. Nobody’s land? The oldest evidence of early Upper Paleolithic settlements in inland Iberia. Science Advances 10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado3807 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, L.G. 2018. El Paleolítico Superior de la península ibérica. Trabajos de Prehistoria 75: 951. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2018.12202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Study area in the Iberian Peninsula (A) with a relief map (B) showing the hydrographic network and the known (red) and newly identified sites (yellow) (modified from MDT05-cob1 2008-2015 CC-BY 4.0 scne.es; figure by authors).

Figure 1

Table 1. Radiocarbon determinations for Cueva Grande, calibrated in OxCal 4.4 using IntCal20.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Exterior (A) and interior (B) views of Cueva Grande; C) S1 north-east stratigraphic profile; D) plan showing test pits; E) lithic artefacts (1, large blade; 2, retouched blade; 3 & 4, microgravettes) (figure by authors).

Figure 3

Figure 3. El Bosque Shelter: A) interior view; B) bottom of test pit 2; C) plan and elevations; D) lithic artefacts (1 & 3, bladelets; 2, retouched bladelet) (figure by authors).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Ciño Negro shelter: A) interior view; B) location of the combustion area (red outline), after excavation of layer 2 of level 1; C) stratigraphy of the test pit, showing the combustion area in level 1 (dashed line); D) flint burin on truncation (figure by authors).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Vega de Albarcaz: A) quartzite artefacts (1, Levallois core; 2, discoid core; 3, naturally backed knife); B) view of the site from the east (figure by authors).