Introduction
Military sexual trauma (MST), defined as sexual harassment or assault during military service (Galovski et al., Reference Galovski, Street, Creech, Lehavot, Kelly and Yano2022), predicts poor mental health (Surís & Lind, Reference Surís and Lind2008). Whilst sexual trauma in non-military contexts is similarly detrimental to mental health (Dworkin, Menon, Bystrynski, & Allen, Reference Dworkin, Menon, Bystrynski and Allen2017), unique features of sexual violence during military service warrant consideration. Survivors may live, work, and socialize alongside perpetrators (Herriott, Campbell, Godier-McBard, Wood, & Murphy, Reference Herriott, Campbell, Godier-McBard, Wood and Murphy2024), and support pathways are often institutionally linked.
Such circumstances may contribute to Institutional Betrayal, where an institution an individual feels dependent on betrays their trust (Smith & Freyd, Reference Smith and Freyd2014). Institutional Betrayal may exacerbate the mental health impacts of MST (Smith & Freyd, Reference Smith and Freyd2013) through mechanisms like betrayal-based moral injury, arising from violations of trust by institutions or their members (Frankfurt et al., Reference Frankfurt, DeBeer, Morissette, Kimbrel, La Bash and Meyer2018; Lopes, McKinnon, & Tam-Seto, Reference Lopes, McKinnon and Tam-Seto2023). Other associated experiences include victim blaming (Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, McKinnon and Tam-Seto2023) and disengagement with military-associated healthcare services due to institutional distrust (Holliday & Monteith, Reference Holliday and Monteith2019; Kelly, Reference Kelly2021).
Though MST is experienced by men and women, a meta-analysis of MST prevalence rates found 38.4% of women and 3.9% of men reported MST (Wilson, Reference Wilson2018). Women with MST experiences may experience higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression compared to men with MST experiences (Tannahill et al., Reference Tannahill, Livingston, Fargo, Brignone, Gundlapalli and Blais2020). The disproportionate exposure rates, coupled with distinct psychological sequalae, motivates elucidating women’s distinct needs.
The formal recognition of the term MST by the United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in 1992 prompted an influx of research, highlighting outcomes, including PTSD, harmful alcohol use, depression, and eating disorders (Allard, N, Gregory, Klest, & Platt, Reference Allard, N, Gregory, Klest and Platt2011; Surís & Lind, Reference Surís and Lind2008). To our knowledge, there have not been any recent reviews of this literature.
This systematic review examines international research investigating mental health outcomes associated with experiencing MST in serving and ex-servicewomen to answer the following research questions:
-
1. What are the mental health outcomes of MST in serving and ex-servicewomen?
-
2. Do different MST experiences (e.g. experiencing military sexual harassment [MSH] or military sexual assault [MSA]) impact mental health differently?
-
3. Do individual differences (e.g. sociodemographic characteristics, military characteristics, and other trauma experiences) influence mental health outcomes following MST?
Methods
Study design
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (McGowan et al., Reference McGowan, Sampson, Salzwedel, Cogo, Foerster and Lefebvre2016). An a priori registration of the review was submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42023429284).
Searches
The search strategy was developed with guidance from the university librarian and the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) 2015 Checklist (McGowan et al., Reference McGowan, Sampson, Salzwedel, Cogo, Foerster and Lefebvre2016). Search terms were related to (1) women/females (e.g. ‘Women’, ‘Female’, ‘Servicewoman’), (2) military (e.g. ‘Military Personnel’, ‘Veteran’, ‘Soldier’) (3) sexual trauma (e.g. ‘Sexual Assault’, ‘Sexual Violence’, ‘MST’), and (4) mental health (e.g. ‘Wellbeing’, ‘Distress’, ‘Mental Disorder’). An example of the search strategy, with a complete list of search terms, is available in the Supplementary Materials (S1).
Databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PILOTS, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched three times (June 2023 [Search 1], May 2024 [Search 2], and March 2025 [Search 3]), using free-text, subject heading searching using the explode function, plus reference, and citation searching. Searches were limited to studies published in English, with no restrictions on publication period or country.
Eligibility
Included studies were required to:
-
• Be original, published, peer-reviewed, primary research, written in English and freely accessible to the review team.
-
• Include serving or ex-servicewomen in the sample.
-
• Present results for women separately.
-
• Asses mental health as a primary outcome of MST and include a comparison group who reported not experiencing MST (quantitative studies) or explore mental health in the context of MST (qualitative studies).
Case studies, gray literature, study registrations, protocols, and studies not specifically investigating MST were excluded.
Study selection
Search 1 (June 2023) yielded 7928 papers, 5041 of which were duplicates and removed. Four studies were identified in a follow-up database search (Search 2; May 2024) and three through reference/citation searching. No additional papers were identified in Search 3 (March 2025). After screening 2891 titles/abstracts, 382 papers were assessed for eligibility.
The PRISMA (2020) flowchart (Figure 1) displays the selection process.

Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart.
Study quality
The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (NHLBI, 2014) was used for the quality assessment of quantitative studies and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Studies Checklist (CASP, 2018) was used for qualitative studies. One author (TO) rated all studies. A random sample (10%) of studies were assessed by the second reviewer (SR) for validation. Discrepancies were resolved collaboratively. ‘Poor’-quality studies were included, but quality was considered when synthesizing findings.
Data extraction
The following were extracted from all studies:
-
• Source.
-
• Study design.
-
• Aims.
-
• Participant eligibility criteria.
-
• Sample size.
-
• Participant demographic information.
Quantitative studies
The following were extracted from quantitative studies:
-
• Exposure to MST
(definitions, measures used, and reported psychometric properties).
-
• Mental health outcome(s).
-
• Data analysis method.
-
• Participant response rate.
-
• Reported statistics.
Qualitative studies
For a meta-aggregative approach to qualitative synthesis (Lockwood, Munn, & Porritt, Reference Lockwood, Munn and Porritt2015), data extraction followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Qualitative Data Extraction Tool (JBI, 2014) guidance. The following were extracted from qualitative studies:
-
• Population.
-
• Phenomena of interest.
-
• Context.
-
• Methodological framework.
-
• Methods.
-
• Findings and supporting evidence.
Extracted findings (themes, sub-themes, and authors’ analyses) were assigned one of three plausibility ratings based on supporting evidence from participant quotations: (1) unequivocal (fully supported by evidence), (2) equivocal (contestable considering the evidence presented), and (3) unsupported (not supported by evidence). Unsupported findings were excluded from data synthesis, but unequivocal and equivocal findings were considered equally. Well-supported findings, whether deemed fully supported or open to interpretation, were compared across studies, grouped into categories based on similarity, and refined into broader synthesized findings.
Data synthesis
Heterogeneity in the MST-mental health literature (Surís & Lind, Reference Surís and Lind2008) motivated a narrative synthesis approach (Popay et al., Reference Popay, Roberts, Sowden, Petticrew, Arai, Rodgers and Duffy2006). Quantitative and qualitative findings were considered collectively, with qualitative findings providing depth to quantitative results. The potential role of bias was considered when interpreting findings.
Terminology
Included studies used the terms ‘female’ and ‘woman’ interchangeably. Though we acknowledge these distinct terms relate to biological sex and gender identity, respectively (Heidari, Babor, De Castro, Tort, & Curno, Reference Heidari, Babor, De Castro, Tort and Curno2016), we mirror each study’s language when presenting study information to accurately reflect participant inclusion criteria. To promote clarity, the terms serving woman or ex-servicewoman are used to encapsulate both ‘female’ and ‘woman’ when presenting synthesized findings.
Given variation in how sexual harassment and sexual assault are defined in both the MST and wider sexual violence literature (Dworkin et al., Reference Dworkin, Menon, Bystrynski and Allen2017), we adopt broad definitions to maximize study inclusion. Sexual harassment is defined as unwanted behavior of a sexual nature, intended to upset, humiliate, offend, or scare another person (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2010). Sexual assault is defined as non-consensual sexual touching (Sexual Offences Act, 2003).
Because terminology related to MST varied across studies, tables mirror terminology used within studies. For clarity in the synthesis, ‘MST’ is used to describe any experience capturing sexual harassment and/or assault during military service, ‘MSA’ to describe sexual assault during miliary service, and ‘MSH’ to describe sexual harassment during military service.
Results
Study characteristics
Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Most used quantitative methods (n = 60) with cross-sectional study designs (n = 54). The remainder employed longitudinal study designs (n = 5), a nested case–control analysis (n = 1) and qualitative methods (n = 3). Most studies were US-based (n = 58). The remaining were conducted in the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 1), France, (n = 1), Israel (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), and the Republic of Korea (n = 1). Most studies (n = 52) only included ex-servicewomen in the sample; four studies included both serving and ex-servicewomen, and seven included only serving women. Studies varied in how they defined and measured MST (see Supplementary Materials [S2]).
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies: author details, study design, sample description, and quality assessment

Note: DoD, Department of Defense; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision; ICD-9 CM, International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision, Clinical Modification; IPV-MST, Intimate Partner Violence- related MST; Non-IPV-MST, Non-Intimate Partner Violence-related MST; N/A, not applicable; N.R., not reported; OEF, Operation Enduring Freedom; OIF, Operation Iraqi Freedom; OND, Operation New Dawn; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation; VA, Department of Veterans Affairs; VHA, Veterans Health Administration.
a Values specific to women/ females in mixed samples.
Quality assessment
Most studies were rated as ‘fair’ quality (n = 49), nine as ‘good’/ ‘excellent’ and five as ‘poor’. Reasons for lower quality ratings often included not accounting for covariates in analyses, not presenting clear study aims, and not clearly defining exposure measures.
Quantitative studies
Table 2 presents the main findings from quantitative studies. Information on descriptive statistics and mental health measures is available in the Supplementary Materials (S3).
Table 2. Quantitative mental health findings

Note: ACE, adverse childhood experience; AUD, alcohol use disorder; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aRR, adjusted risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; CMD, common mental disorders; CPTSD, complex posttraumatic stress disorder; DESNOS, disorders of extreme stress not otherwise specified; DUD, drug use disorder; IPV, intimate partner violence; IPV-MST, intimate partner violence- related military sexual trauma; M, mean, MDD, major depressive disorder; MSA, military sexual assault, MSH, military sexual harassment; MST, military sexual trauma; MSV, military sexual violence; N/A, not applicable; Non-IPV-MST, non-intimate partner violence-related MST; OEF, operation enduring freedom; OIF, Operation Iraqi Freedom; OR, odds ratio, PR, prevalence ratio; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; PTSS, posttraumatic stress symptoms; RR, risk ratio; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error: SI, suicidal ideation, SUD, substance use disorder; VHA, Veterans Health Administration.
PTSD outcomes (n = 33)
Studies examining MST dichotomously (as an umbrella term for a range of behaviours) found associations with probable PTSD (Blais, Livingston, Barrett, & Tannahill, Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023; Fontana & Rosenheck, Reference Fontana and Rosenheck1998; Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Himmelfarb, Yaeger, & Mintz, Reference Himmelfarb, Yaeger and Mintz2006; Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Street, Pavao, Smith, Cronkite, Holmes and Frayne2010; Kimerling, Gima, Smith, Street, & Frayne, Reference Kimerling, Gima, Smith, Street and Frayne2007; Lindsay et al., Reference Lindsay, Keo-Meier, Hudson, Walder, Martin and Kauth2016; Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Cohen, Ren, Bosch, Kimerling and Seal2012; Yaeger, Himmelfarb, Cammack, & Mintz, Reference Yaeger, Himmelfarb, Cammack and Mintz2006; Zelkowitz, Sienkiewicz, Vogt, Smith, & Mitchell, Reference Zelkowitz, Sienkiewicz, Vogt, Smith and Mitchell2022) and higher PTSD symptom scores (Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus, & Street, Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023; Cobb Scott et al., Reference Cobb Scott, Pietrzak, Southwick, Jordan, Silliker, Brandt and Haskell2014; Decker et al., Reference Decker, Ramsey, Ronzitti, Kerns, Driscoll, Dziura, Skanderson, Bathulapalli, Brandt, Haskell and Goulet2021; Dutra et al., Reference Dutra, Grubbs, Greene, Trego, McCartin, Kloezeman and Morland2011; Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023; Luterek, Bittinger, & Simpson, Reference Luterek, Bittinger and Simpson2011; Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter, & Iverson, Reference Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter and Iverson2015; Murdoch et al., Reference Murdoch, Polusny, Hodges, Cowper, Murdoch, Polusny, Hodges and Cowper2006; Murray-Swank, Dausch, & Ehrnstrom, Reference Murray-Swank, Dausch and Ehrnstrom2018; Rønning et al., Reference Rønning, Shor, Anyan, Hjemdal, Jakob Bøe, Dempsey and Espetvedt Nordstrand2024; Wolfe et al., Reference Wolfe, Sharkansky, Read, Dawson, Martin and Ouimette1998) across intrusion, avoidance, cognitive/mood, and hyperarousal symptom clusters (Mahoney, Shayani, & Iverson, Reference Mahoney, Shayani and Iverson2024).
When MST subtypes were examined, MSA more consistently predicted greater PTSD severity (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Gross et al., Reference Gross, Cunningham, Moore, Naylor, Brancu, Wagner, Elbogen, Calhoun and Kimbrel2018; Luterek et al., Reference Luterek, Bittinger and Simpson2011; Wolfe et al., Reference Wolfe, Sharkansky, Read, Dawson, Martin and Ouimette1998; Zerach, Reference Zerach2023) and probable PTSD (Street, Stafford, Mahan, & Hendricks, Reference Street, Stafford, Mahan and Hendricks2008) than MSH (Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston, & Andresen, Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston and Andresen2019; Kang, Dalager, Mahan, & Ishii, Reference Kang, Dalager, Mahan and Ishii2005; Street et al., Reference Street, Stafford, Mahan and Hendricks2008; Surís, Lind, Kashner, Borman, & Petty, Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner, Borman and Petty2004), though MSH was linked to probable PTSD in two studies (Hendrikx, Williamson, & Murphy, Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Dalager, Mahan and Ishii2005). In a study stratified by sexual orientation, MSA increased PTSD symptom severity in the heterosexual sample (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021), with the small sexual minority sub-sample perhaps lacking statistical power to detect an association. Four studies reported no association between MSA and probable PTSD (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Hendrikx et al., Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023; Kearns et al., Reference Kearns, Gorman, Bovin, Green, Rosen, Keane and Marx2016; Moreau et al., Reference Moreau, Duron, Bedretdinova, Bohet, Panjo, Bajos and Meynard2022) and severity (Kearns et al., Reference Kearns, Gorman, Bovin, Green, Rosen, Keane and Marx2016).
Interpersonal support appeared to influence these associations. During deployment, reduced interpersonal support from military networks (Laws, Mazure, McKee, Park, & Hoff, Reference Laws, Mazure, McKee, Park and Hoff2016; Webermann et al., Reference Webermann, Relyea, Portnoy, Martino, Brandt and Haskell2023) mediated links with PTSD symptoms, and concerns surrounding relationships at home exacerbated the impact of MST on PTSD severity (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019). Post-deployment, detriments to non-military networks mediated the association between MST and PTSD symptoms (Fontana & Rosenheck, Reference Fontana and Rosenheck1998; Smith, Brady, Hammer, Carlson, & Mohr, Reference Smith, Brady, Hammer, Carlson and Mohr2020; Smith, Wang, Vaughn-Coaxum, Di Leone, & Vogt, Reference Smith, Wang, Vaughn-Coaxum, Di Leone and Vogt2017; Webermann et al., Reference Webermann, Relyea, Portnoy, Martino, Brandt and Haskell2023), and intimate partner violence (IPV) experiences mediated the association between MST and PTSD-avoidance and PTSD-negative cognitions/mood symptoms (Mahoney et al., Reference Mahoney, Shayani and Iverson2024).
Compared to other traumas, MST predicted higher risk of PTSD (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023) and symptom severity (Surís et al., Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner, Borman and Petty2004) than civilian sexual assault. Comparisons of perpetrator identity (MST perpetrated by intimate partners versus perpetrators who were not intimate partners) revealed no significant differences (Mercado et al., Reference Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter and Iverson2015), suggesting perpetrator identity cannot explain these differences. Considered alongside other trauma exposures, MST and IPV cumulatively predicted higher PTSD symptoms (Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023). Although one study did not find an interaction between MSA and combat exposure in PTSD symptom severity (Gross et al., Reference Gross, Cunningham, Moore, Naylor, Brancu, Wagner, Elbogen, Calhoun and Kimbrel2018), another study found MST interacted with combat exposure to increase combat-related PTSD symptoms (Cobb Scott et al., Reference Cobb Scott, Pietrzak, Southwick, Jordan, Silliker, Brandt and Haskell2014), suggesting MST may exacerbate existing vulnerabilities.
This review found limited evidence linking MST and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) (Luterek et al., Reference Luterek, Bittinger and Simpson2011; Zerach, Reference Zerach2023). CPTSD, characterized by PTSD symptoms plus affective dysregulation, negative self-concept and relationship disturbances, often arises from prolonged or repeated trauma exposure (Herman, Reference Herman1992) and may be influenced by additional factors.
Depression outcomes (n = 23)
Most studies reported associations with MST and probable depression (Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Gradus, Street, Kelly, & Stafford, Reference Gradus, Street, Kelly and Stafford2008; Kearns et al., Reference Kearns, Gorman, Bovin, Green, Rosen, Keane and Marx2016; Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Street, Pavao, Smith, Cronkite, Holmes and Frayne2010; Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Cohen, Ren, Bosch, Kimerling and Seal2012; Moreau et al., Reference Moreau, Duron, Bedretdinova, Bohet, Panjo, Bajos and Meynard2022; Rønning et al., Reference Rønning, Shor, Anyan, Hjemdal, Jakob Bøe, Dempsey and Espetvedt Nordstrand2024) and higher symptom severity (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023; Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Kearns et al., Reference Kearns, Gorman, Bovin, Green, Rosen, Keane and Marx2016; Murray-Swank et al., Reference Murray-Swank, Dausch and Ehrnstrom2018). Null findings from a small, high-risk-of-bias study in US serving women (Dutra et al., Reference Dutra, Grubbs, Greene, Trego, McCartin, Kloezeman and Morland2011) and in study with sexual minority US ex-servicewomen (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021) may have reflected low statistical power.
When MST sub-types were examined separately, MSA predicted probable depression (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston and Andresen2019; Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Gross, Kroll-Desrosiers, & Mattocks, Reference Gross, Kroll-Desrosiers and Mattocks2020; Hankin et al., Reference Hankin, Skinner, Sullivan, Miller, Frayne and Tripp1999; Skinner et al., Reference Skinner, Kressin, Frayne, Tripp, Hankin, Miller and Sullivan2000; Street et al., Reference Street, Stafford, Mahan and Hendricks2008) and higher depression severity more consistently than MSH (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston and Andresen2019). Religious service attendance buffered the impacts of MSA on depression in one study with US ex-servicewomen (Chang, Skinner, & Boehmer, Reference Chang, Skinner and Boehmer2001).
Compared with interpersonal trauma experienced outside of military service, MST was associated with higher depression severity (Newins et al., Reference Newins, Glenn, Wilson, Wilson, Kimbrel, Beckham, Workgroup and Calhoun2021) but not higher risk of probable depression (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023). Comparisons of perpetrator identities (intimate partners versus not intimate partners) revealed no significant differences in depressive symptoms (Mercado et al., Reference Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter and Iverson2015). Two studies suggested that cumulative exposures (e.g. non-military sexual trauma) (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023) and IPV (Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023) alongside MST may elevate depression risk (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023) and symptom severity (Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023).
Anxiety outcomes (n = 8)
Five studies reported significant associations between MST and probable anxiety (Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Street, Pavao, Smith, Cronkite, Holmes and Frayne2010; Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Cohen, Ren, Bosch, Kimerling and Seal2012; Murray-Swank et al., Reference Murray-Swank, Dausch and Ehrnstrom2018; Sumner et al., Reference Sumner, Lynch, Viernes, Beckham, Coronado, Dennis and Ebrahimi2021) and one with higher anxiety symptom severity (Rønning et al., Reference Rønning, Shor, Anyan, Hjemdal, Jakob Bøe, Dempsey and Espetvedt Nordstrand2024). One study found that this relationship lost significance when adjusting for age and race (Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Gima, Smith, Street and Frayne2007) and another found no association in a sample of US transgender ex-servicewomen (Lindsay et al., Reference Lindsay, Keo-Meier, Hudson, Walder, Martin and Kauth2016), highlighting the potential influence of demographic factors.
Suicidality outcomes (n = 17)
Most studies reported associations between MST and suicidality (Murray-Swank et al., Reference Murray-Swank, Dausch and Ehrnstrom2018), including suicidal behaviours (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Newins, Wilson, Elbogen, Dedert, Calhoun, Beckham, Workgroup and Kimbrel2020) and ideation (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston and Andresen2019; Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023; Blais & Geiser, Reference Blais and Geiser2019; Decker et al., Reference Decker, Ramsey, Ronzitti, Kerns, Driscoll, Dziura, Skanderson, Bathulapalli, Brandt, Haskell and Goulet2021; Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023; Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Gradus, King, Galatzer-Levy, & Street, Reference Gradus, King, Galatzer-Levy and Street2017; Gross et al., Reference Gross, Kroll-Desrosiers and Mattocks2020; Hoffmire et al., Reference Hoffmire, Monteith, Denneson, Holliday, Park, Mazure and Hoff2021; Stefanovics, Potenza, Tsai, Nichter, & Pietrzak, Reference Stefanovics, Potenza, Tsai, Nichter and Pietrzak2023). Both MSH and MSA increased risk of suicidal ideation (Gross et al., Reference Gross, Kroll-Desrosiers and Mattocks2020; Monteith et al., Reference Monteith, Kittel, Schneider, Miller, Holliday, Katon, Brenner and Hoffmire2023), with MSA more consistently reported as a predictor (Blais et al., Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Livingston and Andresen2019; Monteith et al., Reference Monteith, Kittel, Schneider, Miller, Holliday, Katon, Brenner and Hoffmire2023). One study identified depressive symptom severity and PTSD-related anhedonia as mediators in the association between MSA and suicidal ideation. No significant pathways were observed for MSH (Blais & Geiser, Reference Blais and Geiser2019), indicating potentially distinct mechanisms.
Comparisons of MST with other interpersonal traumas did not find unique effects of MST. MSA was associated with suicidal ideation in US serving and ex-servicewomen, but this association did not differ significantly from civilian adulthood sexual assault (Newins et al., Reference Newins, Glenn, Wilson, Wilson, Kimbrel, Beckham, Workgroup and Calhoun2021). Similarly, suicidal ideation and behaviour did not differ among US ex-servicewomen who had experienced MST only, IPV only, or both MST and IPV (Esopenko et al., Reference Esopenko, De Souza, Wilde, Dams-O’Connor, Teng and Menefee2023).
One study with university-enrolled US serving and ex-servicewomen did not identify an association between MST and suicidality (Bryan, Bryan, & Clemans, Reference Bryan, Bryan and Clemans2015), perhaps reflecting potentially distinct support resources available to participants in this sample. Accordingly, another study found that perceived post-deployment support mediated the relationship between deployment MST and suicidal ideation (Monteith et al., Reference Monteith, Hoffmire, Holliday, Park, Mazure and Hoff2018). Together, findings implicate psychological distress and access to social support as influential in the relationship between MST and suicidality.
Harmful substance use outcomes (n = 11)
Most studies observed associations between MST and probable harmful substance use (Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Maguen, Xia, Barnes, Peltz and Yaffe2019; Hankin et al., Reference Hankin, Skinner, Sullivan, Miller, Frayne and Tripp1999; Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Street, Pavao, Smith, Cronkite, Holmes and Frayne2010; Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Cohen, Ren, Bosch, Kimerling and Seal2012; Surís, Lind, Kashner, & Borman, Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner and Borman2007; Yalch, Hebenstreit, & Maguen, Reference Yalch, Hebenstreit and Maguen2018), as well as greater symptom severity (Yalch et al., Reference Yalch, Hebenstreit and Maguen2018). Two studies identified PTSD (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019) and depression (Gradus et al., Reference Gradus, Street, Kelly and Stafford2008) symptoms as potential mediators of this relationship. One small study did not find an association between MST and past year alcohol problems in US serving women (Fillo, Goodell, Homish, & Homish, Reference Fillo, Goodell, Homish and Homish2023), perhaps reflecting limited statistical power.
Studies found MSA was more consistently associated with MSA than MSH. Specifically, MSA (but not MSH) predicted harmful alcohol use in UK ex-servicewomen (Hendrikx et al., Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023) and was associated with both higher harmful alcohol use scores and risk for harmful alcohol use in US ex-servicewomen (Surís et al., Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner and Borman2007). Despite positive associations between higher MST frequency and alcohol use severity (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019), one study found high exposure to any military stressors increased probable substance use disorder (SUD) risk, whilst exposure to MSA alone was associated with higher SUD symptoms but not greater SUD risk (Yalch et al., Reference Yalch, Hebenstreit and Maguen2018). Taken together, findings suggest that trauma exposure generally, rather than MST itself, may influence substance use.
Disordered eating outcomes (n = 5)
Findings related to MST and disordered eating were mixed. Two studies found that MST was associated with probable eating disorders in US ex-servicewomen (Breland, Donalson, Dinh, & Maguen, Reference Breland, Donalson, Dinh and Maguen2018) and with a comorbid eating disorder amongst those with PTSD (Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Cohen, Ren, Bosch, Kimerling and Seal2012). The role of PTSD in this association remained unclear. One high-risk-of-bias study found PTSD mediated the relationship between MSA with bulimia nervosa and food preoccupation symptoms in US ex-servicewomen (Sandhu, Dougherty, & Haedt-Matt, Reference Sandhu, Dougherty and Haedt-Matt2022). Contrastingly, another study did not find a mediating role of PTSD, but suggested an indirect pathway via shape and weight concerns (Zelkowitz et al., Reference Zelkowitz, Sienkiewicz, Vogt, Smith and Mitchell2022). In US serving women, psychological distress fully mediated the relationship between MST and disordered eating symptoms (Harned & Fitzgerald, Reference Harned and Fitzgerald2002), with the focus on recent workplace MST potentially reflecting a unique context where participants may have remained in contact with perpetrators.
General mental health and functioning outcomes (n = 10)
Findings indicated that MST negatively impacted general mental health in both serving (Harned, Ormerod, Palmieri, Collinsworth, & Reed, Reference Harned, Ormerod, Palmieri, Collinsworth and Reed2002; Kim, Lee, Lee, Han, & Park, Reference Kim, Lee, Lee, Han and Park2017) and ex-servicewomen (Mercado et al., Reference Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter and Iverson2015; Skinner et al., Reference Skinner, Kressin, Frayne, Tripp, Hankin, Miller and Sullivan2000), with one study observing greater negative impacts of MST than non-military sexual assault (Surís et al., Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner and Borman2007). Religious service attendance was identified as a potential protective factor (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Skinner and Boehmer2001). With regards to somatic symptoms specifically, a positive association with MST was observed in US ex-servicewomen (Murray-Swank et al., Reference Murray-Swank, Dausch and Ehrnstrom2018), with MSH and MSA each identified as predictors (Street et al., Reference Street, Stafford, Mahan and Hendricks2008). Contrastingly, only MSH was associated with high physical somatisation in UK ex-servicewomen (Hendrikx et al., Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023).
Combined outcomes (n = 2)
Neither study examining mental health as a combined variable observed significant associations with either MSH or MSA (Hendrikx et al., Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023) (Murdoch et al., Reference Murdoch, Pryor, Polusny, Wall, Cowper Ripley and Gackstetter2010).
Other psychiatric conditions (n = 4)
MST was associated with impulse-control disorders, dissociative disorders, bipolar disorder (Kimerling et al., Reference Kimerling, Gima, Smith, Street and Frayne2007; Sumner et al., Reference Sumner, Lynch, Viernes, Beckham, Coronado, Dennis and Ebrahimi2021), and personality disorders (Sumner et al., Reference Sumner, Lynch, Viernes, Beckham, Coronado, Dennis and Ebrahimi2021) in US ex-servicewomen. In one study with transgender US ex-servicewomen, MST predicted bipolar disorder and personality disorder but not schizophrenia (Lindsay et al., Reference Lindsay, Keo-Meier, Hudson, Walder, Martin and Kauth2016).
Qualitative findings
Qualitative synthesis yielded 27 findings (Table 3). One unsupported finding was excluded, leaving 26 unequivocally (n = 9) and equivocally supported (n = 17) findings, which were grouped into 13 categories and then collated into four synthesized findings (Table 4). Although themes like maladaptive coping and negative changes to self-perception overlapped with mental health impacts, they were analyzed separately due to being interpreted as secondary responses to primary outcomes like PTSD and depressive symptoms.
Table 3. Qualitative findings and supporting evidence

Note: N/A, not applicable.
Table 4. Synthesized findings and categories

Mental health impacts
MST was linked to a range of mental health symptoms, including depression (Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento, & Street, Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023) and PTSD (Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman, & Monteith, Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018) (Katz, Huffman, & Cojucar, Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Anxiety was linked to safety concerns around people and revictimisation fears (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023), leading to isolation (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Suicidal ideation and attempts appeared linked to difficulty coping with MST-related distress (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Whilst some participants experienced posttraumatic growth (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023), this appeared contingent on mental healthcare or effective social support.
Maladaptive coping
Motivations to escape distressing symptoms (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018) appeared to promote risky behaviours like reckless driving (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023), physical altercations (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023), and risky sexual behaviours (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Disordered eating (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018) and substance use (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023) also emerged as coping methods, with levels of substance use described as proportional to the salience of negative memories (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023).
Negative changes to self-perception
Self-blame was linked to disordered eating aimed at weight gain to prevent sexual attention (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Self-blame and feelings of powerlessness (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023) also related to disordered eating through lowered self-esteem, including body dissatisfaction (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018).
Support from others is important for mental health
Although social support emerged as beneficial for coping with poor mental health (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017), decreased interpersonal trust (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023) appeared to prevent engagement with informal networks. Participants in one study reported positive psychotherapy treatment experiences (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017), however, evidence was limited by potential bias arising from participants via the psychotherapy service.
Discussion
This review identified 63 papers (58 US-based) investigating mental health outcomes associated with MST in serving and ex-servicewomen. Quantitative studies identified associations between MST and adverse mental health, with qualitative studies adding contextual insight. MSA was most strongly linked with poor mental health. Experiencing additional traumas often amplified mental health impacts, whilst social support appeared to mitigate poor outcomes.
Mental health outcomes
Consistent with wider sexual violence literature (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Murad, Paras, Colbenson, Sattler, Goranson and Zirakzadeh2010; Dworkin, Reference Dworkin2020) and MST-specific research (Surís & Lind, Reference Surís and Lind2008), PTSD and depression were commonly identified outcomes. Quantitative and qualitative studies identified them as contributors to additional adverse outcomes, including substance use (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Gradus et al., Reference Gradus, Street, Kelly and Stafford2008; Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017), disordered eating (Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Sandhu et al., Reference Sandhu, Dougherty and Haedt-Matt2022), and suicidality (Blais & Geiser, Reference Blais and Geiser2019).
The mediating roles of PTSD and depression in the relationship between MST and substance use (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Gradus et al., Reference Gradus, Street, Kelly and Stafford2008) were illustrated in qualitative studies as motivators for substance use to suppress symptoms. In line with self-medication models (Khantzian, Reference Khantzian1997) (Hawn, Cusack, & Amstadter, Reference Hawn, Cusack and Amstadter2020), quantitative and qualitative studies suggested a dose–response relationship, with higher severity and frequency of traumatic experiences (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Yalch et al., Reference Yalch, Hebenstreit and Maguen2018) and salience of traumatic memories (Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023) leading to higher substance use to cope with symptoms. This aligns with evidence that sustained disruptions to stress regulation increases risk for maladaptive coping methods like substance use (Sinha, Reference Sinha2024). Addressing PTSD and depression symptoms could therefore deter harmful substance use.
Aligning with general population research on trauma and disordered eating (Hayes, Linardon, Kim, & Mitchison, Reference Hayes, Linardon, Kim and Mitchison2021), this review similarly identified several pathways between MST and disordered eating (Breland et al., Reference Breland, Donalson, Yongmei, Hebenstreit, Goldstein and Maguen2018; Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Gerber, Holliman and Monteith2018; Harned & Fitzgerald, Reference Harned and Fitzgerald2002; Sandhu et al., Reference Sandhu, Dougherty and Haedt-Matt2022; Breland, Donalson, Dinh, & Maguen, Reference Breland, Donalson, Dinh and Maguen2018). Military-specific factors, like fitness and body composition requirements, restrictions on food choices and mealtimes, and potential repercussions for diagnosed disordered eating, may further shape the development and presentation of disordered eating (Gaviria & Ammerman, Reference Gaviria and Ammerman2023), beyond the impacts of MST. Understanding how the military context influences disordered eating following MST may streamline the identification and treatment of disordered eating.
Findings from this review align with evidence suggesting trauma increases risk for suicide behaviors in military personnel (Williamson et al., Reference Williamson, Croak, Simms, Fear, Sharp and Stevelink2024). As in general populations, where PTSD and depression resulting from sexual assault heighten women’s suicide risk (Ullman, Reference Ullman2004), distressing symptoms appeared to play a similar role in suicidality after MST (Blais & Geiser, Reference Blais and Geiser2019; Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023). Addressing military-specific barriers to help-seeking, like stigma and the perceived incongruence between help-seeking and valued military characteristics (Williamson et al., Reference Williamson, Busuttil, Simms, Palmer, Stevelink and Sharp2025), may help deter the progression from MST-related distress to suicidality.
The role of social support
Social support appeared to have protective effects, whilst detriments to military and non-military support networks (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Fontana & Rosenheck, Reference Fontana and Rosenheck1998) were linked to PTSD (Laws et al., Reference Laws, Mazure, McKee, Park and Hoff2016; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Wang, Vaughn-Coaxum, Di Leone and Vogt2017; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Brady, Hammer, Carlson and Mohr2020; Webermann et al., Reference Webermann, Relyea, Portnoy, Martino, Brandt and Haskell2023). Collectively, quantitative and qualitative studies suggest a cycle, where mental health issues deter social support engagement (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Huffman and Cojucar2017; Reinhardt et al., Reference Reinhardt, McCaughey, Vento and Street2023), contributing to poorer mental health.
Institutional Betrayal has previously been highlighted as a barrier to formal mental healthcare (Holliday & Monteith, Reference Holliday and Monteith2019), where MST may lead to disengagement with military-provided resources due to distrust in the military and feeling unsafe in military-associated healthcare services (Kelly, Reference Kelly2021). Compensatory efforts to overcome barriers to informal or formal support may prevent the development of PTSD and related outcomes (Bryan et al., Reference Bryan, Bryan and Clemans2015; Monteith et al., Reference Monteith, Hoffmire, Holliday, Park, Mazure and Hoff2018).
MST and non-military interpersonal trauma
Comparisons between MST and non-military interpersonal trauma highlight specific associations with MST. Unique associations with PTSD (Surís et al., Reference Surís, Lind, Kashner, Borman and Petty2004) and depression (Newins et al., Reference Newins, Glenn, Wilson, Wilson, Kimbrel, Beckham, Workgroup and Calhoun2021) support the idea that MST features, like Institutional Betrayal, may intensify PTSD and depression (Smith & Freyd, Reference Smith and Freyd2013). Barriers to reporting MST, like concerns of negative institutional reactions, may deter engagement with healthcare services and compound trauma-related distress (Christl, Pham, Rosenthal, & DePrince, Reference Christl, Pham, Rosenthal and DePrince2024; Kelly, Reference Kelly2021). Although these studies did not directly measure Institutional Betrayal, it may help explain the unique associations observed with PTSD and depression. MST did not show distinct associations with suicidal ideation, which may be more influenced by psychiatric sequalae, like PTSD and depression (Blais & Geiser, Reference Blais and Geiser2019; Panagioti, Gooding, & Tarrier, Reference Panagioti, Gooding and Tarrier2009).
Consistent with general population sexual violence research (Classen, Palesh, & Aggarwal, Reference Classen, Palesh and Aggarwal2005), MST alongside other traumas predicts poorer mental health (Banducci et al., Reference Banducci, McCaughey, Gradus and Street2019; Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023; Mercado et al., Reference Mercado, Ming Foynes, Carpenter and Iverson2015; Yalch et al., Reference Yalch, Hebenstreit and Maguen2018). Revictimisation may lead to increased shame and self-blame, as well as avoidance coping (Classen et al., Reference Classen, Palesh and Aggarwal2005), which may increase propensity to poor mental health (Batchelder et al., Reference Batchelder, Safren, Coleman, Boroughs, Thiim, Ironson, Shipherd and O’Cleirigh2018; Kline, Berke, Rhodes, Steenkamp, & Litz, Reference Kline, Berke, Rhodes, Steenkamp and Litz2018; Stewart, Strickland, Noguiera-Arjona, & Wekerle, Reference Stewart, Strickland, Noguiera-Arjona and Wekerle2024). High rates of revictimisation in serving and ex-servicewomen (Baca, Crawford, & Allard, Reference Baca, Crawford and Allard2021; Blais et al., Reference Blais, Livingston, Barrett and Tannahill2023) motivate strategies to address additional risks resulting from multiple interpersonal trauma exposures.
Limitations
Limitations of the review
Excluding grey literature opens the possibility of publication bias. Focusing exclusively on women’s experiences was necessary due to potentially unique outcomes but leaves men’s experiences unexplored. The heterogeneity of mental health outcomes, and correspondingly heterogenous measures, prevented a meta-analysis.
Limitations of the literature
Quantitative studies lacked consensus in their conceptualisations of MST, potentially contributing to some contradictory findings (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Hendrikx et al., Reference Hendrikx, Williamson and Murphy2023; Kearns et al., Reference Kearns, Gorman, Bovin, Green, Rosen, Keane and Marx2016; Moreau et al., Reference Moreau, Duron, Bedretdinova, Bohet, Panjo, Bajos and Meynard2022). Broader sexual violence research is similarly characterized by varied operationalisations of sexual harassment and assault (Dworkin et al., Reference Dworkin, Menon, Bystrynski and Allen2017) and highlights that using single-item measures, not validated measures, and measures which do not include behavioural definitions of MST may lead to inaccuracies (Dworkin et al., Reference Dworkin, Menon, Bystrynski and Allen2017). Patterns of underreporting in formal MST screening settings (Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Galbreath, & Gundlapalli, Reference Blais, Brignone, Fargo, Galbreath and Gundlapalli2018; Hargrave, Danan, Than, Gibson, & Yano, Reference Hargrave, Danan, Than, Gibson and Yano2023) also demand caution, particularly in studies using data from Veterans Health Administration screenings or military-administered surveys.
Most studies were US-based. The distinct US healthcare system for military and veteran populations limits the generalizability of this review to other countries. The small pool of qualitative studies limits insight into the lived experiences of women with MST experiences.
Only two studies investigated the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTQ+) participants (Gorman et al., Reference Gorman, Kearns, Pantalone, Bovin, Keane and Marx2021; Lindsay et al., Reference Lindsay, Keo-Meier, Hudson, Walder, Martin and Kauth2016), one of which included a sample of transgender women. This review therefore includes findings related to the experiences of both cisgender and transgender women. Experiencing MST alongside challenges specific to transgender women (e.g. related to identity, discrimination and minority status) require further research to understand potentially unique impacts. More broadly, research in LGBTQ+ groups is needed to explore how intersecting marginalized identities and minority stress (Binion & Gray, Reference Binion and Gray2020) influences mental health following MST. Future research should also examine whether similar patterns occur amongst men within these minority groups.
Methodological quality across studies varied. Lower-quality studies were included to comprehensively cover the evidence base but were interpreted with caution.
Implications
This review identified specific mental health impacts of MST and highlighted groups potentially at heightened risk for adverse mental health. Potentially protective effects of formal and informal support underscore the importance of engaging women with MST experiences in informal support networks and healthcare services. Further qualitative research is needed to understand how to promote this engagement and provide adequate support.
Calls for policy changes (Defence Committee, 2021) and Ministry of Defence taskforces aimed at tackling issues of violence against women in the UK Armed Forces (Ministry of Defence & Carns, 2025) require a research-informed approach. The lack of UK-based research underscores the need for further studies that could enhance existing UK initiatives and training resources for people working with women with potential MST histories (Combat Stress, 2023) to meet the needs of UK serving and ex-servicewomen.
Conclusion
This large systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies highlights several adverse mental health outcomes associated with MST. Disordered eating, suicidality, and substance use are linked to PTSD and depression symptoms associated with MST, underscoring the importance of early intervention for PTSD and depression. Serving and ex-servicewomen with MSA experiences and with multiple interpersonal trauma exposures may face heightened risk of poor mental health, motivating targeted support for these groups. Overcoming barriers to informal and formal support is essential to maximise protective effects. Findings underscore the critical need for proactive strategies and policies to prevent MST.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172510175X.
Funding statement
This review is part of a project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), through the London Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Doctoral Training Partnership (LISS-DTP) (Grant Number: ES/P000703/1).
Competing interests
MLS was part-funded by a research grant from the Office for Veterans’ Affairs, UK Government and was employed by King’s College London as a Senior Research Fellow at the time of conducting the majority of this work. MLS is currently funded by the Economic Social Research Council (ESRC), UKRI Policy Fellowship, hosted at the Centre for National Training and Research Excellence in Understanding Behaviour (Centre-UB) and seconded into the Cabinet Office, UK Government. MLS is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at King’s College London and Senior Research Fellow at the University of Birmingham. This work has been undertaken only in her capacity as a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at King’s College London and Senior Research Fellow at The University of Birmingham and not in any other capacity listed. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ESRC or the Cabinet Office – UK Government.
DM is a trustee of the Forces in Mind Trust (unpaid) and is employed as the Head of Research for Combat Stress, a UK veterans mental health charity.
NTF is a trustee (unpaid) of Help for Heroes—a charity supporting the health and well-being of serving personnel, veterans and their families, and NTF’s salary is part funded by a grant from the MOD.
TO and SR declare no competing interests.