Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T09:44:14.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Influencing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality in Palestinian Emergency Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2025

Nesreen Alqaissi
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Fuad Farajalla
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Mohammad Qtait*
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Issa M Darabee
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Dania S Khallaf
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Khaled R Daghamin
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
Mariam S Rjoub
Affiliation:
Nursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine
*
Corresponding author: Mohammad Qtait; Email: mohamadtaha98@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains a cornerstone in emergency care, yet its success depends on timely execution, adequate resources, and effective teamwork. Despite global advancements, barriers to high-quality CPR persist, especially in resource-limited settings such as Palestine, where evidence remains scarce.

We conducted a cross-sectional study in the emergency departments of governmental and private hospitals in Hebron, Palestine (January-February 2024), to identify factors influencing CPR quality from nurses’ perspectives. Eighty-three emergency nurses participated, the majority of whom (75.9%) had over 4 years of experience, and 67.5% had completed Basic Life Support training.

Our findings revealed key barriers: unfamiliarity with emergency trolleys (92.8%), equipment failure (89.2%), and lack of team harmony (88%). Conversely, the presence of a designated leader during CPR was the most frequently reported facilitator (86.7%). These results align with international literature emphasizing structured leadership and team dynamics as critical for improving resuscitation outcomes. 1 , Reference Lauridsen, Krogh and Mûller 2 Statistical analysis showed significant associations between demographic variables and perceptions of CPR challenges, including gender and team stress perception (P = .042), and working shifts and leadership presence (P = .020).

These findings underscore the importance of systemic and organizational interventions. Leadership during resuscitation enhances role clarity and communication, mitigating stress and improving performance.Reference Lauridsen, Krogh and Mûller 2 , Reference Qtait 3 Similarly, equipment readiness and staff familiarity with emergency trolleys are essential to prevent delays during life-saving interventions.Reference Ghasemi, Rezapour-Nasrabad and Mokhlesabadifarahani 4 Addressing these gaps through simulation-based training, leadership development programs, and regular equipment audits could significantly improve CPR performance in Palestinian hospitals.

Interestingly, personal stress was considered a major barrier by 79.5% of nurses in our study, in contrast to reports from Brazil, where stress was perceived as less impactful.Reference Filho, Santana-Santos, De Cássia Gengo and Silva 5 This variation suggests cultural and contextual differences that merit further exploration through qualitative research.

In conclusion, improving CPR outcomes requires a dual focus on human factors, such as leadership and stress management, and organizational resources, including equipment availability and training. We recommend that the Ministry of Health adopt structured policies for CPR preparedness and mandate periodic team-based training programs to enhance emergency care quality.

References

American Nurses Association. Emergency Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. 3rd ed. ANA; 2023.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, KG, Krogh, K, Mûller, SD, et al. Barriers and facilitators for in-hospital resuscitation: A prospective clinical study. Resuscitation. 2021;164:7078. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qtait, M. Nurses’ leadership in the work: A systematic review. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2023;25(1). doi:10.25159/2520-5293/13387Google Scholar
Ghasemi, A, Rezapour-Nasrabad, R, Mokhlesabadifarahani, T, et al. Exploring the challenges affecting the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the perspective of Emergency Medical Service personnel: a qualitative study. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2021;40(2):154163. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/559/55969713008/55969713008.pdfGoogle Scholar
Filho, CMC, Santana-Santos, E, De Cássia Gengo, e Silva, R, et al. Factors affecting CPR quality in inpatient units: Nurses’ perception. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(6):907913. doi:10.1590/s0080-623420150000600005CrossRefGoogle Scholar