Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T07:02:54.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The double spermatogenesis in scutigera coleptratrata (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): macro-and Microspermaltocyte growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Carol C. Pruescu ,
Michel Descamps ,
Marie-Chantal Fabre  and
Antoni Serra
Carol C. Pruescu
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologie, Bucharest, Romania, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France and Univesitat de Barcelona,Spain
Michel Descamps*
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologie, Bucharest, Romania, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France and Univesitat de Barcelona,Spain
Marie-Chantal Fabre
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologie, Bucharest, Romania, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France and Univesitat de Barcelona,Spain
Antoni Serra
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologie, Bucharest, Romania, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France and Univesitat de Barcelona,Spain
*
M.Descamps, Laboratoire de Biologie Animale, Ecophysiologie D' Invertébré du Sol, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, F-59655 Villeneuve D'Ascq Cedex, France. Fax: 33 20 43 68 49.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In Scutigera coleoptrata, double spermatogenesis (macro and micro germinal cells) was reinvestigted by means of both image analysis and electron microscopy. Image analysis of the cell-lines showed no differences in DNA content between the two types of spermatogesis.The only difference found, with the exception of the size and the related number of organelles, was that in the macro-cell line the chromatin was well dispersed and no condensed, which is the opposite of what was observed in the macro-cell line. It is asumed that the level of activity related to this condensation process is at the origin of the two pathways of development.

Keywords

ChilopodaDNA ContentSpematocyte growthSpermatogenesisUltrastrucure

Information

Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ansley, H.R. (1954). A cytological and cytophotometric study of alternative pathways of meiosis in the house centipede (Scutigera forceps, Rafinesque). Chromosoma 6, 656–95.Google Scholar
Beniouri, R. (1983). Contribution à l'étude de la spermatogenèse et de son déterminisme chez les Myriapodes Chilopodes. Thèse de 3ème cycle. Université de Lille I.Google Scholar
Bouin, P. & Ancel, P.(1911). Sur l'existence d'un chrmo-some accessoire chez Scutigera coleptrata et sa signification. CR. Anat. 13, 104–24.Google Scholar
Brugal, G. (1984). Image analysis of microscopic preparations. In Methods and Achievements in Exprimental pathology, ed. G, Jasmin. & L, Proschek. 1–33. Basel: Karger.Google ScholarPubMed
Brugal, G. & Chassery, J.M., (1971). Un nouveau système d'analyse densitométrique et morphologique des préparations microscopiques. Histochemstry 52, 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugal, G., Garbay, C., Girouf, F. & Adlelh, D. (1979). A double scanning micrphotometer for image analysis: hardwar, Software and biomedical applications. J Histo-chem.Cytochem. 27, 144–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camatini, M.Franchi, E., Saita, A. & Bellone, L. (1977). Spermiogenesis in Scutigera coleoptrata (Myriapoda Chilopoda). J. Submicrose.Cytol. 9, 373–88.Google Scholar
Descamps, M. (1971). Etude ultrastructurale des spermatogonies et de la croissance spermatocytaire chez Lithobius forficatus L. (Myriapode Chilopode). Z.Zellforsch. 121, 14–26.Google Scholar
Fabre, J.H. (1855). Recherches sur l'anatomie des organes reproducteurs et sur le développement des Myriapodes. Ann.Sci.Nat.Zool. Ser. 43, 257–316.Google Scholar
Fain-Maurel, M.A. (1966). Acquisitions récentes sur les spermatogenèses atypiques. Ann. Biol. 5, 513–64.Google Scholar
Himes, M. & Moriber, L. (1956). A triple stain for desoxyribonucleic acid, Polysaccharides and proteins. Stain Technol. 31. 67–70.Google Scholar
lriki, S. (1941). On the function of apyrene spermatozoa in the silkworm. Zool. Mag.(Tokyo). 53, 123–44.Google Scholar
Jamieson, B.J.M. (1987). The Ultrastructure and phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzini, M., Carcupino, M., Fausto, A.M.Puri, C. & Zapparoli, M. (1992). Further observations on the structure of mature sperm of Scutigera coleoptrata (L.) (Chilopoda, Scutigeromorpha). J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 24, 251–51.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Y. & Brugal, G. (1984). Image analysis of cell proliferation and differentiation in the thymus of the newt Pleurodeles waltlii Michan. by SAMBA 200 cell image processing. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 193, 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunesu, C.C. (1992). The beginning of double spermatogenesis in Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopda). Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck (suppl.) 10, 93–7.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E.S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981). Biometry. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar