Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:21:19.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeding Date, Seeding Rate, and Row Spacing Affect Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Cheat (Bromus secalinus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey A. Koscelny ,
Thomas F. Peeper ,
John B. Solie  and
Stanley G. Solomon Jr.
Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
John B. Solie
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Eng., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Stanley G. Solomon Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Eng., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to determine the effects of winter wheat seeding date and cheat infestation level on cultural cheat control obtained by increasing winter wheat seeding rates and decreasing row spacing. Seeding rate and row spacing interactions influenced cheat density, biomass, or seed in harvested wheat (dockage) at two of three locations. Suppressive effects on cheat of increasing wheat seeding rates and reduced row spacings were greater in wheat seeded in September than later. At two other locations, increasing seeding rate from 67 to 101 kg ha–1 or reducing row spacings from 22.5 to 15 cm increased winter wheat yield over a range of cheat infestation levels.

Keywords

Cheat, Bromus secalinus L. ♯ BROSEwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘2157’Winter wheatbiomasstillering

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 707 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Differential tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to cyanazine and triazinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:569–575.Google Scholar
2. Cousens, R., Pollard, F., and Denner, R.A.P. 1985. Competition between Bromus sterilis and winter cereals. Aspects Appl. Biol. 9:67–74.Google Scholar
3. Fenster, C. R., and McCalla, T. M. 1970. Tillage practices in western Nebraska with a wheat-fallow rotation. Nebr. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 507.Google Scholar
4. Ferreira, K. L., Peeper, T. F., and Epplin, F. M. 1990. Economic returns from cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 4:306–313.Google Scholar
5. Freeze, D. M., and Bacon, R. K. 1990. Row-spacing and seeding-rate effects on wheat yields in the mid-South. J. Prod. Agric. 3:345–348.Google Scholar
6. Holliday, R. 1963. The effect of row width on the yields of cereals. Field Crop Abstr. 16:71–81.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, G., and Tucker, B. 1988. OSU soil test calibrations. OSU Ext. Facts No. 2225. Coop. Ext. Serv., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, J. W., Hargrove, W. L., and Moss, R. B. 1988. Optimizing row spacing and seeding rate for soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 80:164–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Joseph, K.D.S.M., Alley, M. M., Brann, D. E., and Gravelle, W. D. 1985. Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 77:211–214.Google Scholar
10. Kemp, D. R., Auld, B. A., and Medd, R. W. 1983. Does optimizing plant arrangements reduce interference or improve the utilization of space? Agric. Systems 12:31–36.Google Scholar
11. Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Solomon, S. G. Jr. 1990. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate and cultivar on yield loss from cheat (Bromus secalinus). Weed Technol. 4:487–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Marshall, G. C., and Ohm, H. W. 1987. Yield responses of 16 winter wheat cultivars to row spacing and seeding rate. Agron. J. 79:1027–1030.Google Scholar
13. Medd, R. W., Auld, B. A., Kemp, D. R., and Murison, R. D. 1985. The influence of wheat density and spatial arrangement on annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin, competition. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 36:361–371.Google Scholar
14. Roth, G. W., Marshall, H. G., Hatley, O. E., and Hill, R. R. 1984. Effect of management practices on grain yield, test weight, and lodging of soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 76:379–383.Google Scholar
15. Wicks, G. A. 1984. Integrated systems for control and management of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in cropland. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:26–31.Google Scholar