Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-p4db6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:56:03.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Nicosulfuron on Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control and Corn (Zea mays) Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nagabhushana G. Gubbiga ,
A. Douglas Worsham ,
Harold D. Coble  and
Richard W. Lemons
Nagabhushana G. Gubbiga
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
A. Douglas Worsham
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Richard W. Lemons
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at two locations in North Carolina during the summer of 1992 to ascertain the reasons for stunted growth of corn noticed occasionally in fields treated POST with nicosulfuron to control dense infestations of johnsongrass. Treatments consisted of nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha sprayed POST, either over-top or post-directed only to johnsongrass in a single early application or in sequential applications of 17.5 g/ha. Checks included a hand-weeded, paraquat post-directed to johnsongrass, and non-weeded. Nicosulfuron provided satisfactory control of johnsongrass irrespective of whether applied once or sequentially. Corn yield in nicosulfuron-treated plots was as much as three times greater than in non-treated plots depending on hybrid and location. In the absence of johnsongrass interference, nicosulfuron caused a corn yield reduction of 6 to 9%. However, in the presence of johnsongrass interference, an additional 16 to 26% reduction in yield occurred with a POST application of nicosulfuron. Reductions in corn plant height and dry matter accumulation also were noticed for nicosulfuron treatments compared to post-directed application of paraquat and hand removal of johnsongrass.

Keywords

Nicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAcorn, Zea mays L. ‘DeKalb 689,’ ‘Pioneer 3140.’Allelopathyfoliar uptakeleachingpost-directedpostemergenceroot exudation and transferroot uptakesplit applicationSORHA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 574 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1991. Accent® herbicide: For use on field corn. Tech. Bull. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. Inc., Agric. Products Dep., Wilmington, DE. 12 p.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1991. Beacon® herbicide for postemergence weed control in field corn and popcorn. Ciba Corp., Agric. Div., Greensboro, NC. 14 p.Google Scholar
3. Awad, A. E. 1989. Effects of dicamba, nitrogen and presowing hardening of host seed with phenolic acids on witchweed control in sorghum. Ph. D. thesis. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 114 p.Google Scholar
4. Awad, A. E., Worsham, A. D., Corbin, F. T., and Eplee, R. E. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliarly applied 14C-dicamba in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and corn (Zea mays) parasitized with witchweed (Striga asiatica). p. 535–536 in Ransom, J. K., Musselman, L. J., Worsham, A. D., and Parker, C., eds. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. of Parasitic Weeds. Nairobi: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
5. Balazs, S. 1993. Nicosulfuron-resistance and metabolism in terbufos and/or naphthalic anhydride-treated corn. M. S. thesis. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 45 p.Google Scholar
6. Baumann, P. A., Williams, D. A., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1992. The effects of soil applied primisulfuron, nicosulfuron and DPX PE-350 on growth of cotton, corn and grain sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:29.Google Scholar
7. Bendixen, L. E. 1986. Corn (Zea mays) yield in relationship to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) population. Weed Sci. 34:449–451.Google Scholar
8. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonylurea herbicides. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
9. Brown, W. B., Defelice, M. S., and Perkins, C. S. 1988. Postemergence grass control in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43:31–32.Google Scholar
10. Camacho, R. F. and Moshier, L. J. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and activity of CGA 136872, DPX-V9360 and glyphosate in rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 39:354–357.Google Scholar
11. Camacho, R. F., Moshier, L. J., Morishita, D. W., and Devlin, D. L. 1991. Rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays) with primisulfuron and nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 5:789–794.Google Scholar
12. Coupland, D. and Lutman, P.J.W. 1982. Investigations into the movement of glyphosate from treated to adjacent untreated plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101:315–321.Google Scholar
13. Duke, S. O. 1985. Biosynthesis of phenolic compounds: Chemical manipulation in higher plants. p. 113–131 in Thompson, A. C., ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy: Biochemical Interactions Among Plants. ACS Symp. Ser. No. 268. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
14. Eberwine, J. W., Hagood, E. S. Jr., and Kenley, C. C. 1992. Effect of virus diseases on corn as influenced by variety and johnsongrass control method. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:78.Google Scholar
15. Evans, J. R., Carlson, D. R., McKemie, T. E., and Harrell, A. L., 1991. Interaction of bentazon and nicosulfuron on corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:127.Google Scholar
16. Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1990. Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol. 4:615–619.Google Scholar
17. Friedman, T. and Horowitz, M. 1970. Phytotoxicity of subterranean residues of three perennial weeds. Weed Res. 10:382–385.Google Scholar
18. Horowitz, M. and Friedman, T. 1971. Biological activity of subterranean residues of Cynodon dactylon L., Sorghum halepense L., and Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 11:88–93.Google Scholar
19. Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:999–1003.Google Scholar
20. Kaufman, L. M. and Ritter, R. L. 1989. Postemergence weed control in corn with CGA 136872 and DPX-V9360. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 43:24.Google Scholar
21. Linder, P.J.J., Mitchell, J. W., and Freeman, G. D. 1964. Persistence and translocation of exogenous regulating compounds that exude from roots. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:437–438.Google Scholar
22. Lolas, P. C. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Noncompetitive effect of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) on soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:589–593.Google Scholar
23. Lydon, J. and Duke, S. O. 1989. Pesticide effects on secondary plant metabolism of higher plants. Pestic. Sci. 25:361–373.Google Scholar
24. Martin, J. R. and Green, J. D. 1992. Extension's experiences with ‘new’ foliar applied corn herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:329.Google Scholar
25. McCormick, L. L. 1977. Weed survey. South. States Res. Rep., Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:184–215.Google Scholar
26. Ngouajio, M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1990. Response of weeds and corn varieties to DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:47.Google Scholar
27. Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kurtale, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci. 38:45–49.Google Scholar
28. Reid, C. P. and Hunt, W. 1970. Root exudation of herbicides by woody plants: Allelopathic implications. Nature (London). 225:291.Google Scholar
29. Rhodes, G. N. Jr., Hayes, R. M., and Thorton, M. L. 1990. Sequential applications of sulfonylurea herbicides in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci Soc. 43:73.Google Scholar
30. Rodrigues, J.J.V., Worsham, A. D., and Corbin, F. T. 1982. Exudation of glyphosate from wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants and its effects on inter-planted corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:316–320.Google Scholar
31. Slack, C. H., Witt, W. W., Cole, M. D., and Wells, R. B. 1990. Postemergence grass control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:63.Google Scholar
32. Suttle, J. C. and Schreiner, D. R. 1982. Effects of DPX-4189 (2-chloro-N-((4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5,triazin-2-yl)aminocarbanyl)benzenesulfonamide) on anthocyanin synthesis, phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity, and ethylene production in soybean hypocotyls. Can. J. Bot. 60:741–745.Google Scholar
33. Suttle, J. C., Swanson, H. R., and Schreiner, D. R. 1983. Effect of chlorsulfuron on phenylpropanoid metabolism in sunflower seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2:137–149.Google Scholar
34. Weever, D., Baumann, P., Bean, B., and Bremer, J. 1992. Extension's experiences with ‘new’ foliar applied corn herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci Soc. 45:300.Google Scholar
35. Williams, C. S. 1990. Accent®: Broad spectrum weed control for corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:47.Google Scholar
36. Worsham, A. D. and Saunders, E. M. 1992. Method of application and formulation of terbufos and adverse interactions with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:119.Google Scholar
37. Worsham, A. D. and Saunders, E. M. 1991. Method of terbufos application and time of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron application to corn and crop injury. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44.105.Google Scholar
38. Worsham, A. D. and Saunders, E. M. 1991. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control the year after application of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:134.Google Scholar