Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-fzltz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-14T21:57:20.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)—Free Periods on Yield of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul E. Keeley  and
Robert J. Thullen
Paul E. Keeley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
Robert J. Thullen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) was hoed in two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala SJ-2′) fields each year (1979 to 1981) for 2 to 12 weeks after crop emergence to evaluate the influence of several nutsedge-free periods on the growth and reproduction of nutsedge and yields of seed cotton. Compared to the control (plots cultivated but not hoed), a 2-week nutsedge-free period reduced the average number of nutsedge shoots at harvest by 52% (61 vs 29 shoots/m2). Additional hoeings for 4 to 12 weeks further reduced populations by 67 to 87%. Compared to tubers counted in the spring, populations of tubers in control plots increased 3- to 12-fold by harvest. However, compared to control plots, two weekly hoeings reduced tuber populations at harvest by 70 to 90% (treatment average of 884 vs 221 tubers/m2), and additional hoeings tended to reduce, or reduced, tuber populations further (75 to 98% reduction). When cotton yields were reduced in control plots in 1979 and 1980, a 2- to 6-week nutsedge-free period substantially decreased yield losses. Averaged over six locations, yields in plots with a 4- to 12-week nutsedge-free period were greater than yields of control plots.

Keywords

Shoot productiontuber productioncotton qualityplant heightCYPES

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , November 1983 , pp. 803 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bell, R. S., Lachman, W. H., Rahn, E. M., and Sweet, R. D. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast. 1. Northern nutgrass. R. I. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 364. 33.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dawson, J. W. 1970. Time and duration of weed infestations in relation to weed-crop competition. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:13–25.Google Scholar
6. Dowler, C. C., Hauser, E. W., and Johnson, A. W. 1974. Crop-herbicide sequences on a southeastern coastal plain soil. Weed Sci. 22:500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W., Dowler, C. C., Jellum, M. D., and Cecil, S. R. 1974. Effects of herbicide-crop rotation on nutsedge, annual weeds, and crops. Weed Sci. 22:172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Influence of yellow nutsedge competition on furrow-irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 23:171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1978. Light requirements of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and light interception by crops. Weed Sci. 26:10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Miller, J. H., and Carter, C. H. 1979. Comparison of four cropping systems for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control. Weed Sci. 27:463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Miller, J. H., and Carter, C. H. 1983. Comparison of six cropping systems for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control. Weed Sci. 31:63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Murphy, T. R. and Gossett, B. J. 1981. Influence of shading by soybeans (Glycine max) on weed suppression. Weed Sci. 29:610–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rogers, N. K., Buchanan, G. A., and Johnson, W. C. 1976. Influence of row spacing on weed competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 24:410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1981. Longevity of buried yellow nutsedge tubers. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 34:81–86.Google Scholar
17. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Vengris, J. and Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M. 1971. Common purslane competition in table beets and snap beans. Weed Sci. 19:4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar