Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-05T20:54:05.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time thrift and economic science in the eighteenth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2025

Marco Storni Open the ORCID record for Marco Storni [Opens in a new window]
Marco Storni*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral fellow, Université libre de Bruxelles (Belgium)
*
Email: marco.storni@ulb.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

In the last decades, the notion of “economy” has gained a central importance in accounts of early modern experimental culture. Historians of economic science have primarily focused on the repurposing and recycling of materials, namely on thrift as a virtue of the skilled experimenter. In this paper, I propose to consider economy as a quality enacted by technology. As a matter of fact, technology could actualize the principles of economy in its performance, and its “degree of economy” could be measured. I argue that one of the key parameters used to quantify economy was the temporal performance of technology. To ground my view of “time thrift,” I analyze unpublished documents relating to eighteenth-century inventions based on the action of fire (cooking, lighting), scientific reports written by scientists on such inventions, as well as expert assessments on manufacturing activities also connected with the management of heat (distillation).

Keywords

time thrifteconomyfire managementcookinglightingdistillation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 175 - 191
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, Jennifer Karns. 2008. The Mantra of Efficiency: From Waterwheel to Social Control. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1799. Reports respecting the Distilleries in Scotland, by Committees of the Honourable the House of Commons, Appointed in 1798 and 1799. London: J. Wright.Google Scholar
Babbage, Charles. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: C. Knight.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belhoste, Bruno. 2019. Paris Savant: Capital of Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Gianenrico. 2015. Objets portatifs au siècle des Lumières. Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Gianenrico. 2019. “Pour une archéologie des pratiques. Mesure du temps, corps et prestation (XVIIIe–XXe siècle).” Socio-anthropologie 40: 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Gianenrico. 2022. “Cuisine et cultures du feu: de l’âtre au ‘feu enveloppé’ (XVIIIe–début du XIXe siècle).” Food and History 20 (2): 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Gianenrico, and Storni, Marco (eds). 2025. Early Modern Fire: Science, Technology, and the Urban Space. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertucci, Paola. 2017. Artisanal Enlightenment: Science and the Mechanical Arts in Old Regime France. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castelluccio, Stéphane. 2016. L’éclairage, le chauffage et l’eau aux XVII e et XVIII e siècles. Montreuil: Gourcuff Gradenigo.Google Scholar
Chaptal, Jean-Antoine. 1801. Traité théorique et pratique sur la culture de la vigne, avec l’art de faire le vin, les eaux-de-vie, esprit-de-vin, vinaigres simples et composés, vol. 2. Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar
Chomel, Noël. [1709] 1767. Dictionnaire oeconomique: contenant l’art de faire valoir les terres et de mettre à profit les endroits les plus stériles, vol. 2. Paris: Ganeau et al. Google Scholar
Crowley, John E. 2001. The Invention of Comfort: Sensibilities and Design in Early Modern Britain and Early America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dequidt, Marie-Agnès. 2014. Horlogers des Lumières. Temps et société à Paris au XVIII e siècle. Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Fisher, George. 1753. The American Instructor: or, Young Man’s Best Companion. Containing, Spelling, Reading, Writing, and Arithmetick, in an Easier Way than Any yet Published; and how to Qualify Any Person for Business, without the Help of a Master. Philadelphia: printed by B. Franklin and D. Hall.Google Scholar
Forbes, Robert J. 1948. A Short History of the Art of Distillation, from the Beginnings up to the Death of Cellier Blumenthal. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fresneau, François. 1743. À monseigneur D’Argenson, ministre et secrétaire d’État ayant le Département de la guerre.Google Scholar
Frichot, Hélène. 2017. “A Creative Ecology of Practice for Thinking Architecture.” Architectural Design Theory 1: 139–49.Google Scholar
Georges, Louis. 2021. “Afficher l’heure: les discours ordinaires du temps dans les affiches de rue parisiennes (XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles).” In Les Effets de temps: perception et representation de la vitesse, edited by Alix Cazalet-Boudigues and Lucie Ratail, 53–80. Lyon: Université Lyon III-Jean Moulin.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernard. 1992. “The Temporalization of Social Order: Some Theoretical Remarks on the Change in ‘Change’.” In Social Change and Modernity, edited by Haferkamp, Hans and Neil, J. Smelser, 294–320. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Glennie, Paul, and Thrift, Nigel. 2009. Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guybert, Philippe. [1623] 1625. Le médecin charitable, enseignant la manière de faire et préparer à la maison avec facilité et peu de frais les remèdes propres à toutes les maladies, selon l’avis du médecin ordinaire. Paris: D. Langlois.Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger. 1971. The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, William. [1801] 1808. An Epitome of Chemistry. New York: Collins & Perkins.Google Scholar
Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane. 2000. L’invention technique au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane. 2004. “Cosmopolitisme et réseaux de sociabilité d’un entrepreneur au siècle des Lumières: Ami Argand (1750–1803).” In Circulations techniques en amont de l’innovation: hommes, objets et idées en mouvement, edited by Michel Cotte, 91–94. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter M. 2008. Industrial Enlightenment: Science, Technology and Culture in Birmingham and the West Midlands, 1760–1820. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lalanne, Léon. 1840. Essai philosophique sur la technologie. Paris: Bourgogne et Martinet.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Charles Gabriel. 1696. La médecine aisée, contenant plusieurs remèdes faciles et expérimentez pour toute sorte de maladies internes et externes: avec une petite pharmacie commode et facile à faire à toute sorte de personnes. Paris: É. Michallet.Google Scholar
Leong, Elaine. 2018. Recipes and Everyday Knowledge: Medicine, Science, and the Household in Early Modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leshem, Dotan. 2016. “What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by Oikonomia?” Journal of Economic Perpectives 30 (1): 225–38.Google Scholar
Liger, Louis. 1700. Œconomie générale de la campagne, ou nouvelle maison rustique, vol. 1. Paris: Charles De Sercy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurdrac, Marie. 1656. La chymie charitable et facile, en faveur des dames. Paris: [Se vend rue des Billettes].Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Ayesha. 2015. Penury into Plenty: Dearth and the Making of Knowledge in Early Modern England. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nyerges, A. Endre (ed.). 1997. Ecology of Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oki, Sayaka. 2011. “L’utilité des sciences d’après les discours des secrétaires perpétuels de l’Académie royale des sciences de Paris au XVIIIe siècle.” In Entre belles-lettres et disciplines: les savoirs au XVIII e siècle, edited by Franck Salaün and Jean-Pierre Schandeler, 77–88. Ferney-Voltaire: Centre International d’Étude du XVIIIe siècle.Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, Richard J., Ramón Marcaida, José, and Marr, Alexander (eds). 2021. Ingenuity in the Making. Matter and Technique in Early Modern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Paquier, Serge. 2004. “La trajectoire international d’un innovateur-entrepreneur au siècle des Lumières: Ami Argand (1750–1803).” In Circulations techniques en amont de l’innovation: hommes, objets et idées en mouvement, edited by Michel Cotte, 95–110. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Antoine-Augustin. 1805. L’art de faire les eaux-de-vie, d’après la doctrine de Chaptal; où l’on trouve les procédés de Rozier, pour économiser la dépense de leur distillation, et augmenter la spirituosité des eaux-de-vie de vin, de lie, de marc, de cidre, de grains, etc. Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar
Perkins, John. [1696] 1796. Every Woman Her Own House-Keeper; or, the Ladies’ Library. London: J. Ridgway.Google Scholar
Rozier, François. 1783. Cours complet d’agriculture théorique, pratique, économique, et de médecine rurale et vétérinaire, vol. 4. Paris: [printed at] Rue et Hôtel Serpente.Google Scholar
Seguin, Maria-Susana. 2023. “The Royal Academy of Sciences of Paris and the Birth of Historical Epistemology.” In Ordering Knowledge: Disciplinarity and the Shaping of European Modernity, edited by Chardin, Jean-Jacques, Corneanu, Sorana, and Somerset, Richard, 187–208. Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spary, Emma C. 2012. Eating the Enlightenment: Food and the Sciences in Paris, 1670–1760. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spary, Emma C. 2014. Feeding France: New Sciences of Food, 1760–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 2005. “Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices.” Cultural Studies Review 11 (1): 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storni, Marco. 2020. “Clocks and Timekeeping in Lavoisier’s Experiments on Animal Respiration: The Chemical Revolution, its Material Culture and Taken-for-Granted Knowledge.” In Material Histories of Time. Objects and Practices, 14 th–19 th Centuries, edited by Gianenrico Bernasconi and Susanne Thürigen, 187–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storni, Marco. 2021. “Denis Papin’s Digester and its Eighteenth-Century European Circulation.” The British Journal for the History of Science 54 (4): 443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thébaud-Sorger, Marie. 2004. “Amitiés, entraides et circulations techniques: les affinités électives de l’entrepreneur Argand.” In Circulations techniques en amont de l’innovation: hommes, objets et idées en mouvement, edited by Michel Cotte, 111–28. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past & Present 38 (Fall): 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valleriani, Matteo. 2017. “The Epistemology of Practical Knowledge.” In The Structures of Practical Knowledge, edited by Valleriani, Matteo, 1–19. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Damme, Stéphane. 2020. “The Academization of Parisian Science (1660–1789): Review Essay on a Spatial Turn.” In The Institutionalization of Science in Early Modern Europe, edited by Giulia Giannini and Mordechai Feingold, 20–51. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venel, Gabriel-François. 1754. “Distillation.” In Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 4, edited by Denis Diderot and Jean Le Rond d’Alembert, 1054a–1059b. Paris: Briasson et al. Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. 2010. “Distillation: Transformations in and out of the Kitchen.” In Renaissance Food from Rabelais to Shakespeare: Culinary Readings and Culinary Histories, edited by Fitzpatrick, Joan, 89–104. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Werrett, Simon. 2018. “Household Oeconomy and Chemical Inquiry.” In Compound Histories: Materials, Governance and Production, 1760–1840, edited by Roberts, Lissa and Werrett, Simon, 35–56. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werrett, Simon. 2019. Thrifty Science: Making the Most of Materials in the History of Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, John J. 1999. Brandy, Balloons, & Lamps: Ami Argand, 1750–1803. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar