Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2025
The aim of this article is to extend the scope of the theory of regularity structures in order to deal with a large class of singular stochastic partial differential equations of the form \begin{equation*}\partial_t u = \mathfrak{L} u+ F(u, \xi),\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}\partial_t u = \mathfrak{L} u+ F(u, \xi),\end{equation*}
where the differential operator  $\mathfrak{L}$ fails to be elliptic. This is achieved by interpreting the base space
$\mathfrak{L}$ fails to be elliptic. This is achieved by interpreting the base space  $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ as a non-trivial homogeneous Lie group
$\mathbb{R}^{d}$ as a non-trivial homogeneous Lie group  $\mathbb{G}$ such that the differential operator
$\mathbb{G}$ such that the differential operator  $\partial_t -\mathfrak{L}$ becomes a translation invariant hypoelliptic operator on
$\partial_t -\mathfrak{L}$ becomes a translation invariant hypoelliptic operator on  $\mathbb{G}$. Prime examples are the kinetic Fokker-Planck operator
$\mathbb{G}$. Prime examples are the kinetic Fokker-Planck operator  $\partial_t -\Delta_v - v\cdot \nabla_x$ and heat-type operators associated with sub-Laplacians. As an application of the developed framework, we solve a class of parabolic Anderson type equations
$\partial_t -\Delta_v - v\cdot \nabla_x$ and heat-type operators associated with sub-Laplacians. As an application of the developed framework, we solve a class of parabolic Anderson type equations \begin{equation*}\partial_t u = \sum_{i} X^2_i u + u (\xi-c)\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}\partial_t u = \sum_{i} X^2_i u + u (\xi-c)\end{equation*}
on the compact quotient of an arbitrary Carnot group.
 $(1+1)$-dimensional time-space white noise. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 51 (2015), 1486–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$(1+1)$-dimensional time-space white noise. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 51 (2015), 1486–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $P(\unicode{x03D5})_2$. (2023), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2311.16398.Google Scholar
$P(\unicode{x03D5})_2$. (2023), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2311.16398.Google Scholar ${\bar\partial}_{b}$ complex and analysis on the Heisenberg group. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 27 (1974), 429–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\bar\partial}_{b}$ complex and analysis on the Heisenberg group. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 27 (1974), 429–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${\bar\partial}_{b}$ complex on strongly pseudoconvex boundaries. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1974), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\bar\partial}_{b}$ complex on strongly pseudoconvex boundaries. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1974), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $\mathbb{R}^2$. Electron. Commun. Probab. 20 (2015), .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\mathbb{R}^2$. Electron. Commun. Probab. 20 (2015), .CrossRefGoogle Scholar $\unicode{x03D5}^4_2$ equation. J. Funct. Anal. 288,  (2025).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\unicode{x03D5}^4_2$ equation. J. Funct. Anal. 288,  (2025).CrossRefGoogle Scholar $d\leqslant 3$. J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), 3187–3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$d\leqslant 3$. J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), 3187–3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar