Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T21:24:14.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Powder diffraction analysis of hydraulic cements: ASTM Rietveld round-robin results on precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

Paul Stutzman
Paul Stutzman
Affiliation:
Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phase composition estimates by X-ray powder diffraction and Rietveld analysis are becoming more widely used in the cement industry. The ASTM C01.23 Compositional Analysis subcommittee developed test method C 1365, “Standard Test Method for Determination of the Proportion of Phases in Portland Cement and Portland-Cement Clinker Using X-Ray Powder Diffraction Analysis.” A round-robin analysis involving 11 laboratories was initiated to assess the precision and bias of this approach and to develop guidelines for Rietveld analysis of hydraulic cements. Four cements were prepared using NIST SRM clinkers spiked with known amounts of one or more of the following minerals: gypsum, bassanite, anhydrite, and calcite. Specimens were provided with instructions that laboratories analyze the whole cement, collect data in triplicate, and repack the specimen for each run. The results of the round robin were used to estimate interlaboratory and intralaboratory precision and bias of phase abundance determinations. The results show an improvement over previous cement round-robin studies utilizing traditional internal-standard-based, peak-area-measurement methods.

Information

Type
XRD Characterization
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 97 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aldridge, L. P. (1982). “Accuracy and Precision of Phase Analysis in Portland Cement by Bogue, Microscopic, and X-Ray Diffraction Methods,” Cem. Concr. Res.CCNRAI0008-884610.1016/0008-8846(82)90087-4 12, 381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, L. P. “Accuracy and Precision of an X-Ray Diffraction Method for Analyzing Portland Cements,” Cem. Concr. Res. CCNRAI 437–446.Google Scholar
ASTM C 1365-98 (1999). “Standard Test Method for Determination of the Proportion of Phases in Portland Cement and Portland-Cement Clinker Using X-ray Powder Diffraction Analysis,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA), Vol. 4.01.Google Scholar
ASTM C 150-02 (2001). “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA), Vol. 4.01.Google Scholar
ASTM C 670 (2001). “Standard Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for Construction Materials,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA), Vol. 4.02.Google Scholar
ASTM E 177-86 (2001). “Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA), Vol. 14.01.Google Scholar
ASTM E 691 (2001). “Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA), Vol. 4.01.Google Scholar
Bogue, R. H. (1929). “Calculation of the Compounds in Portland Cement,” PCA Fellowship Paper, No. 21, October; see also Bogue, R. H. (1929). Ind. Eng. Chem.IECHAD0019-7866 1, 192.Google Scholar
Moore, A. E. (1964). “Comparison of the Results Obtained for the Compound Composition of Portland Cements by X-Ray Diffraction, Microscopy, and Wet Chemical Methods,” Monograph No. 18, Soc Chem Ind., 331–61.Google Scholar
Rukhin, A. L. and Vangel, M. G. (1998). “Estimation of a Common Mean and Weighted Means Statistics,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. ZZZZZZ 93, 303–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, L. J. (1990). “Cooperative Calibration and Analysis of Cement Clinker Phases, Report 2,” Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series No. 556 (Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), p. 21.Google Scholar
Stutzman, P. E. (2003). “Development of an ASTM Standard Test Method on X-Ray Powder Diffraction Analysis of Hydraulic Cements,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Denver X-ray Conference, Denver, Colorado (unpublished).Google Scholar
Stutzman, P. E. and Leigh, S. (2002). “Phase Composition Analysis of the NIST Reference Clinkers by Optical Microscopy and X-ray Powder Diffraction,” NIST Technical Note 1441, p. 44.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. F. W. (1997). Cement Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Telford, UK), p. 459.Google Scholar
Youden, W. J. (1973). “Statistical Techniques for Collaborative Tests,” J. Assoc. Off Anal Chem. ZZZZZZ , p. 64.Google Scholar