Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T11:11:21.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vitrification of simulated highly active calcines containing highconcentrations of sodium and molybdenum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

Mike T. Harrison*
Affiliation:
National Nuclear Laboratory, Sellafield, Seascale, Cumbria, CA20 1PG, UK.
Carl J. Steele
Affiliation:
Sellafield Ltd, Sellafield, Seascale, Cumbria, CA20 1PG, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Sodium carbonate is currently being considered as a wash-out reagent for theremoval of the settled solids in the unagitated Highly Active Liquor (HAL)storage tanks at Sellafield. As the settled solids are expected to comprisemainly zirconium molybdate (ZM), this will result in a challenging feed to theWaste Vitrification Plant (WVP) containing high concentrations of bothmolybdenum and sodium.

In previous studies, it was shown that at high wash-out waste loadings, i.e. 10– 12 wt% MoO3 incorporation, there was very littletolerance in ‘Ca/Zn’ base glass for extra sodium beforethe formation of significant separated sodium molybdate salt phase. However,higher amounts of sodium can be accommodated in borosilicate glasses if thewash-out waste loading is reduced. Further studies have now been carried out toinvestigate the vitrification of more representative calcined waste feeds. Bothpure zirconium molybdate (ZM) and blended ZM-reprocessing waste calcines wereproduced from the appropriate liquor feeds. The maximum waste incorporations ofthese two calcines in ‘Ca/Zn’ base glass have beendetermined, along with a complete product quality assessment. This assessmentincluded measuring the bulk density, degree of crystallinity, heat treatment,durability (Soxhlet and PCT), glass transition temperature, and viscosity.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Harrison, M. T., Procedia Materials Science, 7, 1015 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, M. J., Maxwell, L. J., Ward, T. R., A Methodology for Post Operational Clean Out of a Highly Active Facility Including Solids Behaviour -12386, Waste Management Symposium 2012.Google Scholar
Paul, N., Hammond, R. B., Hunter, T. N., Edmondson, M., Maxwell, L., Biggs, S., Polyhedron, 89, 129141 (2015).Google Scholar
Short, R. J., Hand, R. J., Hyatt, N. C., Mobus, G., J. Nucl. Mater., 340, 179186 (2005).Google Scholar
Hand, R. J., Short, R. J., Morgan, S., Hyatt, N. C., Mobus, G., Lee, W.E., Molybdenum in glasses containing vitrified nuclear waste, ESG Proceedings, 2004.Google Scholar
Nicoleau, E., Schuller, S., Angeli, F., Charpentier, T., Jollivet, P., Le Gac, A., Fournier, M., Mesbah, A., Vasconcelos, F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 427, 120133 (2015).Google Scholar
Short, R., Turner, E., Dunnett, B., Riley, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1107, 261267 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM, “ASTM C965–81: Measuring viscosity of glass above the softening point,” 1981.Google Scholar
Dunnett, B. F., Gribble, N. R., Riley, A. D. and Steele, C. J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1193, 291298 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM, “ASTM C1285–02: Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT),” 2002.Google Scholar
Henry, N., Deniard, P., Jobica, S., Breca, R., Fillet, C., Bart, F., Grandjean, A., Pinet, O., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 333, 199205 (2004).Google Scholar
Curti, E., Crovisier, J. L., Morvan, G., Karpoff, A. M., Appl. Geochem. 21, 11521168 (2006).Google Scholar
Harrison, M. T., Procedia Materials Science 7, 186192 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, P. B., Ojovan, M. L., Hyatt, N. C. and Lee, W. E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 824, 321326 (2008)Google Scholar