Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:53:36.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Governance and Firm Performance under China's State Capitalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2015

Douglas B. Fuller ,
Victor Shih  and
Ran Tao
Douglas B. Fuller
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Victor Shih
Affiliation:
University of California San Diego, USA
Ran Tao
Affiliation:
Renmin University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Choi, Jiang, and Shenkar (2015) offer an interesting and new perspective on the relationship between local governance and firm performance in China. This commentary focuses first on how we conceive of the nature of China's capitalism and then examines what that suggests about their metrics and findings.

Keywords

Chinainstitutionsproperty rightsspecial economic zones (SEZs)state capitalismstate-owned enterprises (SOEs)

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4: Special Issue Expanding Research on Family Business in China , December 2015 , pp. 711 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. 2000. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. In NBER working paper 7771, ed. NBER. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. 2005. History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Revew, 95 (4): 1190–1213.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. 2015. The revival, legitimization, and development of private enterprise in China: Empowering state capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Choi, J. C., Jiang, C., & Shenkar, O. 2015. The quality of local government and firm performance: The case of China's provinces. Management and Organization Review, 11 (4): 679–710.Google Scholar
Hsing, Y. 2010. The great urban transformation: Politics of land and property in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. 2008. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the state. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National People's Congress. 2004. Constitution of the People's Republic of China. ed. National People's Congress. Beijing.Google Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1999. Rural China takes off. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ong, L. H. 2012. Prosper or perish: Credit and fiscal systems in rural China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tanzi, VitoV. 1997. The changing role of the state in the economy: A historical perspective (IMF Working Paper WP/97/114). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Teng, D. 2010. Corporate governance and corporate objectives in different Chinese state-owned enterprises. PhD, King's College London.Google Scholar
Walter, C., & Howie, F. 2011. Red capitalism. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wang, A. L. 2013. The search for sustainable legitimacy: Environmental law and bureaucracy in China. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 37 (2): 365–440.Google Scholar
Zweig, D. 2002. Internationalizing China: Domestic interests and global linkages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar