No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Environmental damages and the prospects for economic development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2025
Abstract
We analyze the extent to which the prospects for economic development may relate to the environmental damages associated with economic activities. We consider an economic growth framework in which production activities generate polluting emissions which in turn negatively affect production capabilities, and publicly-funded abatement is pursued to mitigate such effects. Since the time preference is endogenously related to capital, abatement affects the size of the discount factor through its implications on capital accumulation. We show that the elasticity of environmental damages affects the optimal tax rate and thus the abatement level, which in turn determines whether the economy will end up in a stagnation or growth regime. This suggests that the cross-country heterogeneity in environmental damages may explain the different development patterns experienced by industrialized and developing economies. Our results are robust to the presence of productive public spending and two alternative forms of capital (clean and dirty capital).
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Acheampong, A.O. and Opoku, E.E.O.. (2023). Environmental degradation and economic growth: investigating linkages and potential pathways. Energy Economics 123, 106734.10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheampong, A.O., Opoku, E.E.O. and Dzator, J.. (2022). Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate. Energy Economics 109, 105942.10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiyedogbon, J.O., Ogwuche, D.D. and Zuhumben, N.J.. (2024). Impact of environmental degradation on economic growth. American Journal of Environmental Economics 3, 82–92.10.54536/ajee.v3i1.3243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. and Levinson, A.. (2001). The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Public Economics 80, 269–286.10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00110-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansuategi, A. and Marsiglio, S.. (2017). Is environmental protection expenditure beneficial for the environment? Review of Development Economics 21, 786–802.10.1111/rode.12267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azam, M. (2016). Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energies Review 65, 175–182.10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 103–125.10.1086/261726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. (2009). Rare disasters, asset prices, and welfare costs. American Economic Review 99, 243–264.10.1257/aer.99.1.243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. and Mulligan, C.B.. (1997). The endogenous determination of time preference. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 729–758.10.1162/003355397555334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benarroch, M. and Weder, R.. (2006). Intra-industry trade in intermediate products, pollution and internationally increasing returns. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52, 675–689.10.1016/j.jeem.2006.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt, C. and Akan, Y.. (2014). Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: the Turkish case. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 4, 484–494.Google Scholar
Bretschger, L. and Smulders, S.. (2007). Sustainable resource use and economic dynamics. Environmental and Resource Economics 36, 1–13.10.1007/s10640-006-9043-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M.M. (1997). Is growth a dirty word? Pollution, abatement and endogenous growth. Journal of Development Economics 54, 261–281.10.1016/S0304-3878(97)00043-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassou, S.P. and Hamilton, S.F.. (2004). The transition from dirty to clean industries: optimal fiscal policy and the environmental kuznets curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, 1050–1077.10.1016/j.jeem.2003.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, H., Lai, C.-C. and Liao, C.-H.. (2016). A note on environment-dependent time preferences. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 1652–1667.10.1017/S1365100514000960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennig, F., Budolfson, M., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. and Socolow, R.. (2015). Inequality, climate change impacts on the future poor and carbon prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 15827–15832.10.1073/pnas.1513967112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dioikitopoulos, E.V., Ghosh, S., Karydas, C. and Vella, E.. (2020). Roads to prosperity without environmental poverty: the role of impatience. Economics Letters 186, 108870.10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economides, G. and Philippopoulos, A.. (2008). Growth enhancing policy is the means to sustain the environment. Review of Economic Dynamics 11, 207–219.10.1016/j.red.2007.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egli, H. and Steger, T.M.. (2007). A dynamic model of the environmental Kuznets curve: turning point and public policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 36, 15–34.10.1007/s10640-006-9044-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Becker, A., Enke, B., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U.. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 133, 1645–1692.10.1093/qje/qjy013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R. and Timmer, M.P.. (2015). The next generation of the Penn world table. American Economic Review 105, 3150–3182.10.1257/aer.20130954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forum, W.E. (2021). Global risks 2021: fractured future. Available at https://www.reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2021-future/?doing_wp_cron=1656645635.3263499736785888671875.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S., Ray Barman, T. and Gupta, M.R.. (2020). Are short-term effects of pollution important for growth and optimal fiscal policy? Journal of Public Economic Theory 22, 1262–1288.10.1111/jpet.12438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L. (2013). Climate change policy’s interactions with the tax system. Energy Economics 40, S3–S11.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grönqvist, H., Nilsson, J.P. and Robling, P.O.. (2020). Early lead exposure and outcomes in adulthood. Journal of Political Economy 128, 3376–3433.10.1086/708725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, M.R. and Barman, T.. (2009). Fiscal policies, environmental pollution and economic growth. Economic Modelling 26, 1018–1028.10.1016/j.econmod.2009.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerty, K. and Tiwari, A.. (2025). Industrial water pollution and agriculture: evidence from rivers in India. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 12, 1277–1315.10.1086/734935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. (1994). The reasonableness of non-constant discounting. Journal of Public Economics 53, 31–51.10.1016/0047-2727(94)90012-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, G., Wang, S. and Zhang, B.. (2020). Watering down environmental regulation in. China Quarterly Journal of Economics 135, 2135–2185.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991). The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organization Dynamics 16, 4–18.Google Scholar
Institute, S. R. (2021). The economics of climate change: no action not an option. Available at https://www.swissre.com/dam/jcr:e73ee7c3-7f83-4c17-a2b8-8ef23a8d3312/swiss-re-institute-expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.pdf.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
John, A. and Pecchenino, R.. (1994). An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Economic Journal 104, 1393–1410.10.2307/2235455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouvet, P.A., Michel, P. and Rotillon, G.. (2005). Optimal growth with pollution: how to use pollution permits? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29, 1597–1609.10.1016/j.jedc.2004.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, D.A. and Shapiro, J.S.. (2019). Consequences of the clean water act and the demand for water quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 134, 349–396.10.1093/qje/qjy019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 443–477.10.1162/003355397555253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Kama, A.A. and Schubert, K.. (2007). A note on the consequences of an endogenous discounting depending on the environmental quality. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 272–289.10.1017/S1365100507060063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitao, N.C. (2014). Economic growth, carbon dioxide emissions, renewable energy and globalization. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 4, 391–399.Google Scholar
Liddle, B. (2001). Free trade and the environment-development system. Ecological Economics 39, 21–36.10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00215-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, B. (2015). What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates. Global Environmental Change 31, 62–73.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, C.M. (2004). The environmental Kuznets curve and flow versus stock pollution: the neglect of future damages. Environmental and Resource Economics 29, 483–506.10.1007/s10640-004-1046-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, J.E. and van der Ploeg, F.. (1994). Pollution, the cost of public funds and endogenous growth. Economics Letters 46, 339–349.10.1016/0165-1765(94)90155-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohtadi, H. (1996). Environment, growth and optimal policy design. Journal of Public Economics 63, 119–140.10.1016/0047-2727(95)01562-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. (2013). Integrated economic and climate modeling. In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1069–1131.10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00016-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebelo, S. (1991). Long run policy analysis and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy 99, 500–521.10.1086/261764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulders, S. and Gradus, R.. (1996). Pollution abatement and long-term growth. European Journal of Political Economy 12, 505–532.10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00013-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. (2022). A time for action on climate change and a time for change in economics. Economic Journal 132, 1259–1289.10.1093/ej/ueac005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokey, N.L. (1998). Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review 39, 1–31.10.2307/2527228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strulik, H. (2012). Patience and prosperity. Journal of Economic Theory 147, 336–352.10.1016/j.jet.2011.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taconet, N., Mejean, A. and Guivarch, C.. (2020). Influence of climate change impacts and mitigation costs on inequality between countries. Climatic Change 160, 15–34.10.1007/s10584-019-02637-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, A.K. (2011). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from India. Applied Econometrics and International Development 11, 85–122.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. (2001). Vulnerability indices, climate change impacts and adaptation.Google Scholar
Vella, E., Dioikitopoulos, E.V. and Kalyvitis, S.. (2015). Green spending reforms, growth and welfare with endogenous subjective discounting. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19, 1240–1260.10.1017/S1365100513000813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Rieger, M.O. and Hens, T.. (2016). How time preferences differ: evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology 52, 115–135.10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T. (2018). Optimal dynamic pollution taxation: stock versus flow pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 92, 596–618.Google Scholar
Weber, E.U. and Hsee, C.. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science 44, 1205–1217.10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. (1994). On the “environmental” discount rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 200–209.10.1006/jeem.1994.1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanase, A. (2011). Impatience, pollution and indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, 1789–1799.10.1016/j.jedc.2011.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, S. and Song, G.. (2013). Exploring carbon emissions, economic growth, energy and R&D investment in China by ARDL approach. InProceeding of the 2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics.10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626205CrossRefGoogle Scholar