Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-13T01:57:17.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INSTRUMENTAL RULES AND MOTIVATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2007

Antony Hatzistavrou
Antony Hatzistavrou
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus and Clare Hall, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I address the issue of the normativity of instrumental rules (for example, legal rules). On the one hand, I criticize Scott Shapiro's “constraint model” of instrumental rule-following according to which instrumental rules have motivational clout qua rules: the agent conforms to them simply because they are rules. On the other, I argue for a purely epistemic account of instrumental rule-following. According to this account, instrumental rules inform the agent which action she is required to perform but do not get her to act. Rather the agent is motivationally guided by the reasons for which she adopted the instrumental rules.

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Legal Theory , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 315 - 345
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at a meeting of the Stirling Political Theory Group and at an Open Session of the 2006 Joint Meeting of the Mind and the Aristotelian Society at the University of Southampton. I am grateful to the participants of these events (especially Maria Alvarez, Antony Duff, Kathlyn Farkas, and Kent Hurtig) for comments and suggestions. I am also grateful to Matthew Kramer and two anonymous referees of LEGAL THEORY for their written comments on an earlier draft. I owe a special debt to Scott Shapiro for a long discussion on his theory and a set of written comments on an earlier draft.