Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:53:38.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The discourse of resistance: Social change and policing in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2007

JOHN WILSON  and
KARYN STAPLETON
JOHN WILSON
Affiliation:
School of Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, j.wilson@ulster.ac.uk
KARYN STAPLETON
Affiliation:
School of Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, k.stapleton@ulster.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modern social theory highlights the role of language in social change/reproduction, yet rarely draws on actual linguistic resources or theory. Equally, sociolinguistics situates linguistic practice within the social domain, but only weakly makes links to social theory. Using a linguistic analysis of policing discourses in Northern Ireland, this article considers how such analyses can both inform and be informed by broader social theories. Policing is a contentious issue for nationalists, and despite recent reforms, many continue to regard the (new) police force with suspicion. Data from nationalist women in Belfast are used to explore the thematic frameworks and interactional/pragmatic strategies (pragmatic blocking) through which the speakers jointly produce a “discourse of resistance,” effectively blocking acceptance of the new service. The analysis is discussed in relation to theories of social change (with particular reference to Bourdieu's habitus). Considered are implications for sociolinguistics, social theory, and policing policy in Northern Ireland.This article derives from an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)-funded study (Award No. RES 00-22-0257).

Keywords

policingNorthern Irelandnationalistsdiscoursehabitusresistancepragmatic blockingsocial theory

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 393 - 425
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bell, Alan; Coupland, Nikolas; Jaworski, Adam; & Ylanne-McEwen, Virpi (1997). Editorial. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1:1–5.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan; Bock, Mary; & McCormick, Kay (2000). Narrative inequality and the problem of hearability in the TRC hearings. Working Papers on Language Power and Identity 8:1–28.Google Scholar
Boguslavsky, Igor (2001). On the scales and implicatures of even. In Eniko Nemeth & Karoly Bibok (eds.), Pragmatics and the flexibility of word meaning, 29–50. Oxford: Elsevier.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. R. Nice (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. M. Adamson (trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the new myths of our time. R. Nice (trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, & Wacquant, Loic J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brewer, John D.; Guelke, Adrian; Hume, Ian; Moxon-Browne, Edward; & Wilford, Rick (1996). The police, public order and the state. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's.
Brown, Kris, & MacGinty, Roger (2003). Public attitudes toward partisan and neutral symbols in post-Agreement Northern Ireland. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 10:83–108.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, Deborah (ed.) (1990). The feminist critique of language: A reader. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah; Frazer, Elizabeth; Harvey, Penelope; Rampton, Ben; & Richardson, Kay (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.
Candlin, Chris (2000). General editor's preface. In Justine Coupland (ed.), Small talk, 13–20. London: Longman.
Carston, Robyn (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, Robyn (2005). Explicatures and semantics. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/workshop/papers/carston.htm
Clayman, Steven (2001). Answers and evasions. Language and Society 30:403–42.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff (1999). Discourse and the mind. Human Studies 22:163–81.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff (2005). Language without mind. In Hedwig te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 79–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, Justine (ed.) (2000). Small talk. London: Longman.
Coupland, Nikolas; Srikant, Sarangi; & Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.) (2001). Sociolinguistics and social theory. London: Longman.
Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. London: Routledge
Ellison, Graham (1999) “Reflecting all shades of opinion”: Public attitudinal surveys and the construction of police legitimacy in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology 40:88–111.Google Scholar
Ellison, Graham, & Smyth, Jim (2000). The crowned harp: Policing Northern Ireland. London: Pluto.
Erickson, Frederick (2004). Talk and social theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman (2000). Discourse, social theory and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4:163–95.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6:353–75.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Francescotti, Robert M. (1995). Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered. Linguistics and Philosophy 18:153–73.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1993). Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary. Language in Society 22:337–59.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1993). New rules of sociolological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Cambridge: Polity.
Grice, Herbert Paul (1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, Herbert Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Handley, Simon J., & Feeney, Aidan (2004). Reasoning and pragmatics: The case of even if. In Ira A. Noveck andDan Sperber (eds.), Experimental pragmatics, 228–53. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hargie, Owen; Saunders, Christine; & Dickson, David (1994). Social skills in interpersonal communication. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Heller, Monica (1995). Language choice, social institutions, and symbolic domination. Language in Society 24:373–405.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica (2001). Undoing the macro/micro dichotomy: Ideology and categorisation in a linguistic minority school. In Nikolas Coupland, Srikant Sarangi, & Christopher N. Candlin (eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory, 212–35. London: Longman.
Honneth, Axel (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In Nancy Fraser & Axel Honneth (eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange, 110–97. London: Verso.
Horn, Laurence R. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61:121–74.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huspek, Michael (1991). Language and power. Language in Society 20:131–37.Google Scholar
Huspek, Michael (1993). Duelling structures: The theory of resistance in discourse. Communication Theory 3:1–25.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. (2000a). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken (2000b). Hedges boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness 9:179–97.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Karttunen, Lauri, & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In Choon-Kyu Oh & David A. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.
Lakoff, George (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2:458–508.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lycan, William (1991). Even and even if. Linguistics and Philosophy 14:115–50.Google Scholar
Mayr, Andrea (2004). Prison discourse: Language as a means of control and resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
McCarthy, Michael (2003). Talking back: “Small” interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36:33–63.Google Scholar
McGarry, John (2000). Police reform in Northern Ireland. Irish Political Studies 15:173–82.Google Scholar
Mulholland, Marc (2002). The longest war: Northern Ireland's troubled history. New York: Oxford University Press.
Myers, Greg (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10:1–35.Google Scholar
Neale, Stephen (2000). On being explicit. Mind and Language 15:284–94.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimating claims. Human Studies 9:219–29.Google Scholar
Poynton, Cate (1997). Language difference and identity: Three perspectives. Literacy and Numeracy Studies 7:7–24.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.
Rampton, Ben (2001). Language crossing, cross talk and cross disciplinarity in sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland et al. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory, 261–97. London: Longman.
Roberts, Celia; Davies, Evelyn; & Jupp, Tom (1992). Language and discrimination. London: Longman.
Sacks, Harvey (1998). Lectures on conversation, Vols. 1 and 2. G. Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sapir, Edward (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Schegloff, Emmanuel, A. (1982). Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of uh-huh, and other things that come between sentences. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse text and talk, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, Emmanuel, A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8:165–187.Google Scholar
Scheuer, Jann (2003). Habitus as the principle for social practice: A proposal for critical discourse analysis. Language in Society 32:143–75.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (2001). Discourse markers: Language, meaning and context. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 54–75. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scott, James (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press
Scott, James (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sidnell, Jack (2004). There's risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse and Society 15:745–62.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra; Lele, Jayant, K.; & Martohardjono, Gita (1988). Communication in a multilingual society: Some missed opportunities. Language in Society 17:43–59.Google Scholar
Skeggs, Beverley (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.
Sperber, Dan (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective, 11–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smyth, Jim (2002a). Community policing and the reform of the Royal Ulster Constabulary. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 25:110–24.Google Scholar
Smyth, Jim (2002b). Symbolic power and police legitimacy: The Royal Ulster Constabulary. Crime, Law and Social Change 38:295–310.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Karyn, & Wilson, John (2004). Ulster Scots identity and culture: The missing voice(s). Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 11:563–91.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Karyn, & Wilson, John (in preparation). Political change and the management of cognitive dissonance in Northern Ireland: A discursive study. Ms.
Van der Sant, Rob A. (1988). Context and presupposition. London: Croom Helm.
Wetherell, Margaret (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation Analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:387–416.Google Scholar
Wilson, John (1990). Politically speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilson, John (2001). What is social theory for? In Nikolas Coupland et al. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory, 334–50. London: Longman.
Wilson, John, & Stapleton, Karyn (2005). Voices of commemoration: The discourse of celebration and confrontation in Northern Ireland. Text: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25:633–64.Google Scholar
Wilson, John, & Stapleton, Karyn (2006). New politics, new identities? The case of Northern Ireland. International Journal of the Humanities 2:1867–76.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth; De Cillia, Rudolf; Reisigl, Martin; & Liebhart, Karin (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, & Meyer, Michael (eds.) (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Yngve, Victor (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicage Linguistic Society, 567–77. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.