Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T04:26:48.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The spatial foundations of the conceptual system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Jean M. Mandler
Jean M. Mandler*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego and University College London
*
Correspondence addresses: Jean Mandler, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA. E-mail: jmandler@ucsd.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes that the representation of concepts in infancy is in the form of spatial image-schemas. A mechanism that simplifies spatial information is described along with a small set of spatial primitives that are sufficient to account for the conceptualizations that preverbal infants use to interpret objects and events. This early system is important to understand because it organizes the adult conceptual system of objects and events and remains its core. With development, the system becomes enriched by language in several ways, and also by means of analogical extension to non-spatial information. Nonspatial bodily information, such as feelings of force and motor activity, is also added, but remains secondary. It becomes associated with spatial representations, but except for its spatial aspects is represented in a more inchoate and less accessible fashion.

Keywords

conceptual primitivesspatial representationimage-schemasinfants

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 21 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguiar, A. & Baillargeon, R.. 2002. Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects. Cognitive Psychology 45. 267–336.Google Scholar
Arterberry, M. E. & Bornstein, M. H.. 2001. Three-month-old infants' categorization of animals and vehicles based on static and dynamic attributes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 80. 333–346.Google Scholar
Bahrick, L. E., Gogate, L. J. & Ruiz, I.. 2002. Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: The salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Development 73. 1629–1643.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. 1986. Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants. Cognition 23. 21–41.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. 2004. Infants' reasoning about hidden objects: Evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations. Developmental Science 7. 391–424.
Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A.. 1995. The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary debate, 79–116. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K. & Wilson, C. D.. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7. 84–91.Google Scholar
Biro, S. & Leslie, A. M.. 2007. Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science 10. 379–398.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75. 1–28.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L.. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106. 579–593.Google Scholar
Casasola, M. & Cohen, L. B.. 2002. Infant spatial categorization of containment, support, or tight-fit spatial relations. Developmental Science 5. 247–264.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P. & Campbell, T.. 1997. From beyond to within their grasp: The rudiments of analogical problem-solving in 10- and 13-month olds. Developmental Psychology 33. 790–801.Google Scholar
Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., & Mandler, J. M.. 1999. Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development 14. 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collie, R. & Hayne, H.. 1999. Deferred imitation by 6- and 9-month-old infants: More evidence for declarative memory. Developmental Psychobiology 35. 83–90.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. 2008. Goal-attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition 107. 705–717.Google Scholar
Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O. & Brockbank, M.. 1999. Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition 72. 237–267.Google Scholar
Evans, V. 2003. The structure of time. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. F. III & Singer, L. T.. 1979. The role of simple feature differences in infant recognition of faces. Infant Behavior and Development 2. 39–46.Google Scholar
Frye, D., Rawling, P., Moore, C., & Myers, I.. 1983. Object-person discrimination and communication at 3 and 10 months. Developmental Psychology 19. 303–309.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, A. L. & Waxman, S. R.. 2007. Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization: Evidence from 6- and 12-month-olds. Cognition 105. 218–228.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. & Lakof, G.. 2005. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22. 455–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D. 2003. Why we're so smart. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 195–235. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. 1992. Analogical reasoning in children. Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. 2005. Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In Hampe, B. (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 35–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guyau, J.-M. 1988 [1890]. The origin of the idea of time. In Michon, J. A., Pouthas, V., & Jackson, J. L. (eds.), Guyau and the idea of time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Spatt, J., & Patterson, K.. 1999. ‘What’ and ‘how’: Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96. 9444–9448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2005. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In Hampe, B. (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 15–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. 1982. The perception of causality in infants. Perception 11. 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M. 1984. Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2. 19–32.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R.. 2005a. Can a self-propelled box have a goal?: Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science 16. 601–608.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R.. 2005b. When the ordinary seems unexpected: Evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants. Cognition 95. 297–328.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 1992. How to build a baby II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99. 587–604.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 2004. The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 2005. How to build a baby III: Image-schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In Hampe, B. (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 137–164. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 2008. On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology 21. 207–230.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., Fivush, R., & Reznick, J. S.. 1987. The development of contextual categories. Cognitive Development 2. 339–354.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L.. 1993. Concept formation in infancy. Cognitive Development 8. 291–318.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L.. 1996. Drinking and driving don't mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition 59. 307–335.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L.. 1998a. On developing a knowledge base in infancy. Developmental Psychology 34. 1274–1288.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L.. 1998b. Studies in inductive inference in infancy. Cognitive Psychology 37. 60–96.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L.. 2000. Advancing downward to the basic level. Journal of Cognition & Development 1. 379–404.Google Scholar
Mareschal, D., Powell, D., & Volein, A.. 2003. Basic-level category discriminations by 7- and 9-month-olds in an object examination task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 86. 87–107.Google Scholar
McDonough, L. 1999. Early declarative memory for location. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 17. 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, L. 2002. Basic-level nouns: First learned but misunderstood. Journal of Child Language 29. 357–377.Google Scholar
McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. M.. 2003. Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology 46. 229–259.Google Scholar
Michotte, A. E. 1963. The perception of causality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A.. 2007. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 24. 795–816.Google Scholar
Newcombe, N., Huttenlocher, J., & Learmonth, A.. 1999. Infants' encoding of location in continuous space. Infant Behavior and Development 22. 483–510.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. R.. 1995. Disorders of semantic memory. In Baddeley, A. D., Wilson, B. A. & Watts, F. N. (eds.), Handbook of memory disorders, 167–186. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pauen, S. 2000. Early diferentiation within the animate domain: Are humans something special? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75. 134–151.Google Scholar
Pauen, S. 2002. The global-to-basic level shift in infants' categorical thinking: First evidence from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development 26. 492–499.Google Scholar
Pauen, S. & Träuble, B.. 2009. How 7-month-olds interpret ambiguous motion events: Category-based reasoning in infancy. Cognitive Psychology 59. 275–295.Google Scholar
Pavlova, M., Staudt, M., Sokolov, S. A., Birbaumer, N., & Krägeloh-Mann, I.. 2003. Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions. Brain 126. 692–701.Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W.. 2003. Verifying diferent-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science 14. 119–124.Google Scholar
Perone, S., Madole, K. L., Ross-Sheehy, S., Carey, M., & Oakes, L. M.. 2008. The relation between infants' activity with objects and attention to object appearance. Developmental Psychology 44. 1242–1248.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 6. 576–582.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C. 2003. Concepts are not just for objects: Categorization of spatial relation information by infants. In Rakison, D. R. & Oakes, L. M. (eds.), Early category and concept development, 50–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D. & Rosenkrantz, S. L.. 1993. Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception 22. 463–475.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, J. M., Barsalou, L. W. & McRae, K.. 2003. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science 27. 767–780.Google Scholar
Roberson, D., Davidof, J., Davies, I. R. L. & Shapiro, L. R.. 2005. Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 50. 378–411.Google Scholar
Rochat, P., Morgan, R., & Carpenter, M.. 1997. Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development 12. 537–561.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T. & McClelland, J. L.. 2004. Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D.. 2007. Comprehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 195. 855–865.Google Scholar
Slater, A. 1989. Visual memory and perception in early infancy. In Slater, A. & Bremner, G. (eds.), Infant development, 43–71. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K.. 1992. Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review 99. 605–632.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S. & Hespos, S. J.. 2002. Conceptual development in infancy: The case of containment. In Stein, N. L., Bauer, P., & Rabinowitz, M. (eds.), Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler, 223–246. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R. 1987. Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H.. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28. 675–735.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K. & McCarthy, R.. 1987. Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110. 1273–1296.Google Scholar
White, P. A. 1988. Causal processing: Origins and development. Psychological Bulletin 104. 36–52.Google Scholar
Willatts, P. 1997. Beyond the ‘couch potato’ infant: How infants use their knowledge to regulate action, solve problems, and achieve goals. In Bremner, G., Slater, A., & Butterworth, G. (eds.), Infant development: Recent advances, 109–135. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 69. 1–34.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. 1999. Infants' ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development 22. 145–160.Google Scholar