No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reason and Language in Kant and Hamann
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2025
Abstract
This paper focuses on the critical relation of reason and language in the work of Kant and Hamann. The biographical and intellectual relationship between Kant and Hamann is briefly outlined. The focus then shifts to Hamann’s essay ‘The Metacritique on the Purism of Reason’. The central themes of Hamann’s essay are unpacked. The discussion then considers the central, if ambiguous, role played by Hume in the whole Kant/Hamann debate. The discussion then moves to Hamann’s critique of transcendental idealism and finally to Kant and the question of language.
Information
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review
References
Aarsleff, Hans (1982) From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Bayer, Oswald (2012) A Contemporary in Dissent: Johann Georg Hamann as a Radical Enlightener. Cambridge UK, Michigan: Grand Rapids and William Erdman and Co.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1994) The Magus of the North: J.G. Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Betz, John R. (2012) After Enlightenment: The Post-Secular Vision of J.G. Hamann. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Betz, John R. (2004) ‘Enlightenment revisited: Hamann as the first and best critic of Kant’s philosophy’. Modern Theology, 20, 291–301.10.1111/j.1468-0025.2004.00254.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (2013) The Warburg Years: Essays on Language, Art, Myth, and Technology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1963) ‘Use, usage and meaning’. In Lewis, H. D. (ed.), Clarity is Not Enough (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Graubner, H. (1989) ‘Theological empiricism: aspects of Johann Georg Hamann’s reception of Hume’. Hume Studies, 15, 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor Smith, Ronald (1960) ‘Introduction’. In J.G. Hamann 1730–1788 A Study in Christian Experience (London: Collins).Google Scholar
Griffiths-Dickson, Gwen (1995) Johann Georg Hamann’s Relational Metacriticism. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, Maya (2019) ‘Religion, grammar and style: Wittgenstein and Hamann’. European Review, 27, 195–209.10.1017/S1062798718000820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. G. (1960) ‘Correspondence’. In Gregor Smith, Ronald (ed.), J.G. Hamann 1730–1788: A Study in Christian Experience (London: Collins).Google Scholar
Hamann, J.G. (1996) ‘Letter to Christian Jacob Kraus’. In Schmidt, J. (ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth Century Answers to Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley and London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Hamann, J. G. (2007) ‘The metacritique on the purism of reason’. In Haynes, K. (ed.), Writings on Philosophy and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 205–18.Google Scholar
Hamann, J. G. (2007) Writings on Philosophy and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Peter (1963) ‘The appeal to ordinary language’. In Lewis, H. D. (ed.), Clarity is Not Enough (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008) Hegel on Hamann. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (2018) Kant’s Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108565066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1996) ‘An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment’? Trans and edition in James Schmidt, What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth Century Questions. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, trans Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (2002) ‘Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science’, in H. Allison and P. Heath, eds. Kant Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (2011a) ‘Postscript to Christian Gottlieb Meilcke’s Lithuanian-German dictionary’ in Zöller, G. and Louden, R.B., eds. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2011b) ‘Review of J.G. Herder’s Ideas for the Philosophy of the history of humanity’ in Zöller, G. and Louden, R.B., eds. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2011c) ‘Anthropology from a Pragmatic point of view’ in Zöller, G. and Louden, R.B., eds. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2015) ‘What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking?’ (1786). Translation in Allen Wood and George di Giovanni, eds. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2001) Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107050433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, Walter (2016) Johann Georg Hamann: An Existentialist. New York: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (2011) Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence. London: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Flaherty, James C. (1952) Unity and Language: A Study in the Philosophy of Johann Georg Hamann. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Redmond, M. (2008) ‘The Hamann-Hume connection’ Religious Studies, 23, 95–107.10.1017/S0034412500018564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalow, F. and Velkley, R. (eds.) (2014) The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctv47wc8tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snellman, Laura (2018) ‘Hamann’s influence on Wittgenstein’. Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 7, 59–82.10.15845/nwr.v7i1.3467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane (eds.) (2018) Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316823453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, V. (2012) Herder’s Political Thought: A Study of Language, Culture, and Community. London and Toronto: University of Toronto Press
10.3138/9781442695344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985) ‘Theories of meaning’. In Taylor, Charles (ed.), Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 248–92.10.1017/CBO9781139173483.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2016) Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674970250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White Beck, Lewis (1969) Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, T. C. (1993) Kant’s Philosophy of Language. Chomskyan Linguistics and its Kantian Roots. Lewiston/Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1958) A History of Philosophy: Renaissance, Enlightenment and Modern. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar