Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-01T12:31:29.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Privacy, Respect and the Virtues of Reticence in Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

Sharon Anderson-Gold
Sharon Anderson-Gold
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At a time when the public is increasingly exposed to public scandals, moral defences of privacy are hard to come by. Privacy, it is argued, is merely a cloak for deception and vice. Since the virtuous have nothing to hide, full disclosure of ourselves to others must be a moral obligation. Given the rigour with which Kant defends the prohibition on lying, many have inferred that Kantian ethics must be equally strict on the necessity of truth telling. Do we in fact owe others the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 28 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson-Gold, S. (2001) Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Grenberg, J. (2005) Kant and the Ethics of Humility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. (1997) ‘Must respect be earned?’, in Peterson, G. B. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 19 (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press).Google Scholar
Munzel, G. F. (1999) Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Refective Judgment (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar