No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Militant Constitutionalism and the Paradoxes of Liberalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2025
Abstract
This article uses Böckenförde’s dictum and Williams’s paradox of liberalism as a framework to critically analyse the current theoretical literature on democratic regression and rule of law backsliding in liberal democracies. It argues that the current literature is too strongly focused on (a) the problem of militant democracy (thereby neglecting militant constitutionalism) and (b) on the formal institutional safeguards that are needed to make liberal democracies resilient (thereby partially neglecting the need for a public ethos). In addition, it claims that such an ethos not only implies a democratic attitude but also a patriotic or constitutional attitude.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review
References
Ackerman, Bruce (2006) Before the Next Attack. Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, Heiner (1997) ‘Autonomy and republicanism: Immanuel kant’s philosophy of freedom’, Political Theory, 25(4), 524–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2017) ‘The state as an ethical state’. In Constitutional and Political Theory. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2020a) ‘The rise of the state as a process of secularization’. In Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 152–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2020b) ‘Biographical interview with ernst-wolfgang böckenförde’. Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2020c) ‘The relationship between state and religion in hegel’. Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2020d) ‘The ethos of modern democracy and the church’. Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2020e) ‘The fundamental right of freedom of conscience’. Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 168–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace (2009) Grounding Cosmopolitanism. From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar and Taylor, Charles (2022) Degenerations of Democracy. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone (2019) ‘Constitutional state and constitutionalization’. In Allen, Amy and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.), The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer (2021) ‘The autonomy of autonomy on jürgen habermas’s auch eine geschichte der philosophie’. Constellations, 28(1), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House (2022) Freedom in the World 2022. The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Freedom House (2023) Freedom in the World 2023. Marking 50 Years in the Struggle for Democracy. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Jerg and Voigt, Stefan (2023) ‘Militant constitutionalism: A promising concept to make constitutional backsliding less likely?’. Public Choice, 195(3–4), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996) ‘Between facts and norms’. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of law and democracy. (Cambridge (Mass.): Polity Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1997) A Berlin Republic. Writings on Germany. Cambridge (Mass.): Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1999) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2008) Between Naturalism and Religion. Philosophical Essays. Cambridge (Mass.): Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2021a) ‘Once again: On the relationship between morality and ethical life’. European Journal of Philosophy, 29(3), 543–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2022a) ‘Foreword’. In Prattico, Emilie (ed.), Habermas and the Crisis of Democracy. Interviews with Leading Thinkers (Routledge: London and New York), 13–9.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2022b) ‘Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere’. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holst, Cathrine and Molander, Anders (2015) ‘Jürgen habermas on public reason and religion. do religious citizens suffer an asymmetrical cognitive burden, and should they be compensated?’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18(5), 547–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huq, Aziz and Ginsburg, Tom (2018) ‘How to lose a constitutional democracy’. UCLA Law Review, 1, 79–169.Google Scholar
Huw Rees, Dafydd (2019) ‘Constitutional patriotism’. In Allen, Amy and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.), The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 66–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2023) The Global State of Democracy 2023. The New Checks and Balances. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel (2015) Fragile Democracies. Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonssen Cornell, Anna (2021) ‘Constitutional Self-defense in the 21st Century. Protecting Liberal Democracy and the Rule of Law’. Policy Paper, European Liberal Forum Publication, November, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1948) ‘Absolutism and relativism in philosophy and politics’. The American Political Science Review, 42(5), 906–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (2006a) ‘Wissenschaft und demokratie’. In Verteidigung der Demokratie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 238–247.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (2006b) ‘Verteidigung der Demokratie’. In Verteidigung der Demokratie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 229–37.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2000) ‘Kantian Patriotism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29(4), p. 313–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin (2019) ‘What’s the point of the rule of law’. Buffalo Law Review,67(3), 743–91.Google Scholar
Künkler, Mirjam (2020) ‘Freedom in Religion, Freedom in the State’, In Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–43.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Eerik (2017) ‘Kelsen on democracy and majority decision’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 103(2), 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, Karl (1937) ‘Militant democracy and fundamental rights, I,’. American Political Science Review, 31(3), 417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2012a) ‘Militant democracy’. In Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, Andras (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1253–69.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2012b), ‘A “practical dilemma which philosophy alone cannot resolve”? rethinking militant democracy: An introduction’. Constellations, 19(4), 536–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2007) Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2018) ‘What the dictum really meant – and what it could mean for us’. Constellations, 25(2), 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2019) ‘Individual militant democracy’. In Malkopoulou, Anthoula and Kirshner, Alexander S. (eds.), Militant Democracy and Its Critics. Populism, Parties, Extremism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (2010) ‘Sandel and the paradox of liberalism’. In Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament. Essays 2002–2008 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–22.Google Scholar
Pech, Laurent and Scheppele, Kim Lane (2019) ‘Illiberalism within: Rule of law backsliding in the EU’. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl (1994) The Open Society and its Enemies. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press
Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav (1990) ‚Der relativismus in der rechtsphilosophie‘. In Rechtsphilosophie III, Gesambtausgabe, Band 3 (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Juristischer Verlag), 17–22.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijpkema, Bastiaan (2018) Militant Democracy. The Limits of Democratic Tolerance. London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech (2019a) ‘On the relative irrelevance of constitutional design: Lessons from Poland’. Legal Studies Research Paper Series 19/34, 1–29.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech (2019b) Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, Andras (2019) ‘Militant constitutionalism’. In Malkopoulou, Anthoula and Kirshner, Alexander S. (eds.), Militant Democracy and Its Critics. Populism, Parties, Extremism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, Andras (2023a) ‘Militant Rule of Law’. VerfBlog, 2023/12/20, https://verfassungsblog.de/militant-rule-of-law/, DOI: 10.59704/309ff22756f26063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, Andras (2023b) ‘On the difficulties of rule of law restoration’. In Södersten, Anna and Hercock, Edwin (eds.), The Rule of Law in the EU: Crisis and Solutions (Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies), 60–5.Google Scholar
Sajó, Andras and Tuovinen, Juha (2018) ‘The rule of law and legitimacy in emerging illiberal democracies’. Osteuropa Recht, 64(4), 506–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuller, Florian (2006) ‘Foreword’. In Habermas, Jürgen and Ratzinger, Joseph, The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion (San Francisco: Ignatius Press), 7–18.Google Scholar
Suteu, Silvia (2021), Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z (2004) On the Rule of Law. History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinnevelt, Ronald (2023) ‘The great gamble of the liberal state. fragility, motivational weakness and political regress’. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 52 (1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin (2021) Trust in a Polarized Age. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinx, Lars (2007) Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Legality and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2002) ‘Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (In Florida)?’. Law and Philosophy, 21(2), 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (2003) Kant’s Critique of Hobbes. Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar