Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-6b9td Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-16T13:55:25.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kantian Critique of Marx’s Property Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2025

Howard Williams*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Abstract

Although not explicitly a socialist, in his political philosophy Kant provides arguments that can be deployed by socialists to argue for radically different forms of social and economic organisation. In this article I contrast Karl Marx’s criticism of capitalist property relations with the general theory of property which Kant outlines in his Doctrine of Right. I demonstrate that Kant’s concept of property provides a sounder ethical basis for the regulating and reform of capitalist economic organisations than Marx’s historical materialist view of economic and social development. Kant’s theory of property relations may fall short of Marx’s in terms of the sociological and historical insights it affords but Kant’s theory more than makes up for this is with its greater moral and political astuteness.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cohen, G. A. (1978) Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1985) Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2001) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2010) ‘Justice without Virtue’ in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, William (1976) Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900) Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Akademie-Ausgabe.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical philosophy, translated by Gregor, Mary, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1993) Political Writings, edited by Wootton, David. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1985) Marxism and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1971) Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1976) Capital Volume 1, translated by Fowkes, Ben, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich (1985) Communist Manifesto, translated by Moore, Samuel, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich (1968) Marx Engels Selected Works. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Shimp, Kaleb (2009) ‘The validity of Karl Marx’s Theory of Historical Materialism’. Major Themes in Economics, 11, 3556. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/mtie/vol11/iss1/5 Google Scholar
Torrance, John (1995) Karl Marx’s Theory of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, Lawrence (1998) Ethical Marxism and its Critics. Houndsmill: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26865-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (1977) ‘Kant’s concept of property’. Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 3240.10.2307/2218926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (1983) Kant’s Political Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2004) Karl Marx. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203543375CrossRefGoogle Scholar