Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ms8jb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-02T06:28:55.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on the Fundamental Forces of Matter: Why Attraction and Repulsion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2021

Stephen Howard
Stephen Howard*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
*
stephen.howard@kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses a simple question that has rarely been asked of Kant’s philosophy of nature: why are attraction and repulsion the two fundamental forces of matter? Where proposals can be found in the literature, they are divergent. I provide a new answer, which has strong support from the historical context: Kant pursues a modified version of what I call the ‘reduction method’ that was much debated in the German metaphysical tradition. To this, Kant crucially adds his critical doctrine of regulative ideas, revealing an overlooked way that the Appendix to the Critique informs his philosophy of nature.

Keywords

Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Sciencefundamental forcereductionscientific methodmetaphysics

Information

Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 413 - 433
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alembert, Jean le Rond d’ (1743) Traité de dynamique. Paris: David l’Aîné.Google Scholar
Alembert, Jean le Rond d’ ([1751] 2011) Discours préliminaire de l’Encyclopédie et articles de l’Encyclopédie. Ed. Martine Groult. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1996) Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Blomme, Henny (2015) ‘Kant’s Conception of Chemistry in the Danziger Physik’. In Clewis, Robert R. (ed.), Reading Kant’s Lectures (Berlin: de Gruyter), 484–501.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin (1990) ‘Kants Theorie der Materie und ihre Wirkung auf die zeitgenössische Chemie’. Kant-Studien, 81/2, 170–210.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2001) ‘Kant’s Theory of Matter and his Views on Chemistry’. In Eric, Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusius, Christian Augustus ([1745] 1964) Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. In Giorgio Tonelli (ed.), Die philosophischen Hauptwerke, vol. 2. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Downing, Lisa (2012) ‘Maupertuis on Attraction as an Inherent Property of Matter’. In Andrew, Janiak and Eric, Schliesser (eds), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 280–98.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2008) ‘The Subjective Deduction and the Search for a Fundamental Force’. Kant-Studien, 99, 152–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2014) Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emundts, Dina (2004) Kants Übergangskonzeption im Opus Postumum. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2001) ‘Matter and Motion in the Metaphysical Foundations and the First Critique: The Empirical Concept of Matter and the Categories’. In Eric, Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2013) Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glezer, Tal (2018) Kant on Reality, Cause, and Force: From the Early Modern Tradition to the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimsoeth, Heinz (1956) Studien zur Philosophie Immanuel Kants: Metaphysische Ursprünge und ontologische Grundlagen. Cologne: Kölner Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heimsoeth, Heinz (1969) Transzendentale Dialektik: Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, vol. 3. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter ([1955] 1994) ‘On the Unity of Subjectivity’. Trans. Günter Zöller. In Velkley, Richard L. (ed.), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 17–54.Google Scholar
Heßbrüggen-Walter, Stefan (2004) Die Seele und ihre Vermögen: Kants Metaphysik des Mentalen in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Paderborn: Mentis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Stephen (2019) ‘Dreams of Forces and Pneumatology: Kant’s Critique of Wolff and Crusius in 1766’. Studi Kantiani, 32, 91–115.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. F. (1989) ‘Preface to the New Essays’. In Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber (eds), Philosophical Essays (Indianapolis: Hackett), 291–306.Google Scholar
Locke, John ([1689] 1894) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Alexander Campbell Fraser. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin (2018) ‘Motion and the Affection Argument’. Synthese, 195, 4979–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Michael Bennett (2019) ‘Continuity of Change in Kant’s Dynamics’. Synthese, 196, 1595–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, Michela (2011) ‘Kant’s Dynamical Theory of Matter in 1755, and its Debt to Speculative Newtonian Experimentalism’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre ([1732] 1751) Discours sur les différentes figures des astres. In Oeuvres de M. de Maupertuis, vol. 1 (Lyons: Bruyset), 79–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (1997) ‘Einleitung’ to Immanuel Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Ed. Pollok, Konstantin. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2001) Kants ‘Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft’: Ein kritischer Kommentar. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sheldon R. (2013) ‘Does Kant have a Pre-Newtonian Picture of Force in the Balance Argument? An Account of How the Balance Argument Works’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44, 470–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus ([1777] 2014) Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. Ed. Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2001) ‘Kant’s Dynamics’. In Eric, Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2010) ‘Kant on Attractive and Repulsive Force. The Balancing Argument’. In Mary, Domski and Michael, Dickson (eds), Discourse on a New Method (Chicago: Open Court), 193–241.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (1998) ‘The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science ’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36, 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (ed.) (2001) Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2004) ‘Kant’s Model of Causality: Causal Powers, Laws, and Kant’s Reply to Hume’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42, 449–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2005) Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (ed. and trans.) (2009) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian ([1720] 1983) Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. In Jean École (ed.), Gesammelte Werke, vol. 1/2. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wundt, Max (1984) Kant als Metaphysiker. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar