Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d87pz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T04:37:18.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on God’s Intuitive Understanding: Interpreting CJ §76’s Modal Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Reed Winegar
Reed Winegar*
Affiliation:
Fordham University
*
E-mail: bwinegar@fordham.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In §76 of the third Critique, Kant claims that an intuitive understanding would represent no distinction between possible and actual things. Prior interpretations of §76 take Kant to claim that an intuitive understanding would produce things merely in virtue of thinking about them and, thus, could not think of merely possible things. In contrast, I argue that §76’s modal claims hinge on Kant’s suggestion that God represents things in their thoroughgoing determination, including in their connection to God’s actual will. I conclude by using my interpretation to argue that §76’s modal claims do not entail Spinozism.

Keywords

BaumgartenGodintuitive understandingmodalitySpinoza

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 305 - 329
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumgarten, A.G. (2013) Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Ed. Courtney D. Fugate and John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Boehm, Omri (2014) Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düsing, Klaus (1968) Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Bonn: H. Bouvier.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2011) Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900ff.) Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, and Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992ff.) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohl, Markus (2015) ‘Kant on the Inapplicability of the Categories to Things in Themselves’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23, 90–114.Google Scholar
Kreimendahl, Lothar (1988) ‘Kants Kolleg über Rationaltheologie. Fragmente einer bislang unbekannten Vorlesungsnachschrift’. Kant-Studien, 79, 318–328.Google Scholar
Leech, Jessica (2014) ‘Making Modal Distinctions: Kant on the Possible, the Actual, and the Intuitive Understanding’. Kantian Review, 19, 339–365.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1989) Philosophical Essays. Ed. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1999) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, vol. 4, part A. Ed. Leibniz-Forschungstelle der Universität Münster. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Lord, Beth (2011) Kant and Spinozism: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter (2014) ‘Mechanical Explanation in the “Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment”’. In Ina Goy and Eric Watkins (eds), Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 149–166.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1755–9) Metaphysik. Halle: J. J. Gebauer.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian (2014) ‘Kant on the Cosmological Argument’. Philosopher’s Imprint, 14, 1–21.Google Scholar
Pimpinella, Pietro (2001) ‘“ Cognitio intuitiva” bei Wolff und Baumgarten’. In Michael Oberhausen et al. (eds), Vernunftkritik und Aufklärung. Studien zur Philosophie Kants und seines Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog), pp. 265–294.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens (2001) ‘Symbolische und intuitive Erkenntnis bei Leibniz, Wolff und Baumgarten’. In Hans Poser et al. (eds), VII. Internationaler Leibniz Kongress Berlin, 10.–14. September 2001. Nihil sine ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G.W. Leibniz. Vorträge 3. Teil (Hanover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft), pp. 1178–1184.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1983) Vernünfftigen Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt . Ed. Charles A. Corr. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. (1992) The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar