No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparing tonsillectomy versus tonsil biopsy in the diagnosis of palatine tonsil squamous cell carcinoma – a retrospective analysis of subsequent resection margins
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2025
Abstract
Objectives
Palatine tonsil squamous cell carcinoma can be diagnosed with either tonsillectomy or tonsil biopsies. Biopsies are quicker to perform, less invasive, and provide potentially quicker results. Tonsillectomy minimises risk of missed pathology, but with greater associated morbidity. We compared whether tonsillectomy or biopsy affected surgical margin status at subsequent resection.
Methods
Our Business Intelligence Team provided a list of all patients with a primary tonsil squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery as their primary treatment modality in the last five years at University Hospitals Bristol. Demographic and treatment details were collected along with margin status following surgical resection.
Results
Of the 31 patients that met inclusion criteria, 16 had biopsies and 15 had diagnostic tonsillectomies. The group who underwent tonsillectomy had a reduced risk of close or involved margins (< 5 mm) at subsequent curative-intent surgery (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Our results suggest that tonsillectomy is associated with reduced likelihood of close or involved margins at subsequent curative-intent surgery. We hope this work can prompt larger multicentre comparisons between these two groups to investigate this relationship in more detail.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Main Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
Footnotes
Previously presented as a poster at South West ENT Academic Meeting September 2023 Royal United Hospitals Bath UK
Christopher Heining takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper
References
Campbell, E, McLaren, O, Sheldon, A, Rock, B, Bracey, TS, Malik, T, et al. A two-centre experience of tonsil biopsies in the investigation of patients with tonsillar asymmetry. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024;106:41–4Google Scholar
Siddiq, S, Stephen, S, Lin, D, Fox, H, Robinson, M, Paleri, V. Robotic lateral oropharyngectomy following diagnostic tonsillectomy is oncologically safe in patients with human papillomavirus-related squamous cell cancer: Long-term results. Head Neck 2022;44:2753–9Google Scholar
Homer, JJ, Winter, SC, Abbey, EC, Aga, H, Agrawal, R, Dafydd, DA, et al. Head and Neck Cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines, Sixth Edition. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138(suppl 1):S1–S224Google Scholar
Helliwell, TR, Woolgar, JA. Dataset for histopathology reporting of mucosal malignancies of the pharynx, November 2013, version 2; UK: Royal College of Pathologists. In: https://www.rcpath.org/static/6201bef5-79df-4107-ba6a42833377457f/g111_pharynxmucosaldataset_nov13.pdf [18 December 2014]Google Scholar
Holcomb, AJ, Herberg, M, Strohl, M, Ochoa, E, Feng, AL, Abt, NB, et al. Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2021;43:2434–44Google Scholar
Shenouda, K, Rubin, F, Garcia, D, Badoual, C, Bonfils, P, Laccourreye, O. Evaluation of robotic surgery for transoral resection of T1–2 squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020;137:31–6Google Scholar
Zebolsky, AL, George, E, Gulati, A, Wai, KC, Carpenter, P, Van, Zante A. et al. Risk of pathologic extranodal extension and other adverse features after transoral robotic surgery in patients with HPV-positive oropharynx cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;147:1080–8Google Scholar
Lacas, B, Bourhis, J, Overgaard, J, Zhang, Q, Grégoire, V, Nankivell, M, et al. Role of radiotherapy fractionation in head and neck cancers (MARCH): An updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncology 2017;18:1221–37Google Scholar