Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-14T13:45:43.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of helminth fauna in Rattus rattus rufescens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

H. S. Nama  and
Aruna Parihar
H. S. Nama
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India
Aruna Parihar
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A hclminthological survey of 149 house rats in Jodhpur during the year 1975 revealed infection with 8 helminth species: 4 cestodes, Vampirolepis fraterna, Hymenolepis diminuta, Mathevotaenia symmetrica and Taenia taenlaeformis (larval stage); 3 nematodes, Aspiculuris pakistanica, Rictularia ratti and Syphacia sp. and one acanthocephalan, Moniliformis sp. Vampirolepis fratema, H. diminuta and A.pakistanica were most common, R.ratti and M. symmetrica less frequent, and T. taeniaeformis, Syphacia sp. and Moniliformis sp. of occasional occurrence. Multiple infections were more frequent among male than female hosts.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 99 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Akhtar, S.A. (1955) On the nematode parasites of rats and mice in Lahore, with some remarks on the genus Aspiculuris Schulz, 1924 and two new species of the genus. Pakistan Journal of Scientific Research, 7, 104–111.Google Scholar
Ayres, P.B. (1973) Helminths in rats from refuse tips and farm land. Mammal Review, 3, 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, J.M. (1975) Aspiculuris tetraptera in wild Mus musculus. The prevalence of infection in male and female mice. Journal of Helminthology, 49, 85–90.Google Scholar
Bernard, J. (1963) Etudes sur la faune parasitaire de Tunisie. I. Nematode parasites des Muridae. Extrait des Archives de l' Institut Pasteur de Tunis, 40, 5–64.Google Scholar
Eaton, J.G. (1972) Intestinal helminths in inbred strains of mice. Laboratory Animal Science. 22, 850–853.Google ScholarPubMed
Roman, E. (1951) Etude ecologique et morphologique sur les Acanthocephales et les Nematodes parasites de la region Lyonnaise. Memoires de Museum nationale d'histoire naturelle1, 2A, 49–270.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. (1965) Towards the elucidation of the problem of mutual relations among the parasitic helminths in rodents of the genus Apodemus in Czechoslovakia. Acta University of Agriculture Brno Series Dl, 69–75.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. (1967) Ecological study of helminths of small rodents of the Rohacska Dolina Valley. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemoslovacae Brno, 1, 161–207.Google Scholar
Tenora, F., Murai, E., and Meszaros, F. (1973) Quantitative and qualitative analysis of helminth fauna of Microtus arvalis (Rodentia, Microtidae) in Europe. Parasitologica Hungarica, 6, 131–147.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. and Zejda, J. (1974) The helminth synusy of Clethrionomys glareolus in a lowland forest and its changes. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemoslovacae Brno, 8, 1–48.Google Scholar