Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T05:02:53.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure-preserving equivalent martingale measures for ℋ-SII models

Part of: Mathematical economics Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

David Criens
David Criens*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
*
* Postal address: Technical University of Munich, Parkring 11-13, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany. Email address: david.criens@tum.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we relate the set of structure-preserving equivalent martingale measures ℳsp for financial models driven by semimartingales with conditionally independent increments to a set of measurable and integrable functions 𝒴. More precisely, we prove that ℳsp ≠ ∅ if and only if 𝒴 ≠ ∅, and connect the sets ℳsp and 𝒴 to the semimartingale characteristics of the driving process. As examples we consider integrated Lévy models with independent stochastic factors and time-changed Lévy models and derive mild conditions for ℳsp ≠ ∅.

Keywords

Equivalent martingale measurestochastic volatility modelconditionally independent increments

MSC classification

Primary: 60G44: Martingales with continuous parameter 60G48: Generalizations of martingales 60G51: Processes with independent increments; L'evy processes 91B70: Stochastic models
Secondary: 60G22: Fractional processes, including fractional Brownian motion

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 63, 167–241. Google Scholar
[2]Bauer, H. (2002). Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, 5th edn. De Gruyter, Berlin. Google Scholar
[3]Bichteler, K. (2002). Stochastic Integration with Jumps. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
[4]Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Economy 81, 637–654. Google Scholar
[5]Carr, P., Geman, H., Madan, D. B. and Yor, M. (2003). Stochastic volatility for Lévy processes. Math. Finance 13, 345–382. Google Scholar
[6]Eberlein, E. and Jacod, J. (1997). On the range of options prices. Finance Stoch. 1, 131–140. Google Scholar
[7]Grigelionis, B. (1975). Characterization of stochastic processes with conditionally independent increments. Lithuanian Math. J. 15, 562–567. Google Scholar
[8]He, S. W., Wang, J. G. and Yan, J. A. (1992). Semimartingale Theory and Stochastic Calculus. Science Press, Beijing. Google Scholar
[9]Heston, S. L. (1993). A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev. Financial Studies 6, 327–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hubalek, F. and Sgarra, C. (2006). Esscher transforms and the minimal entropy martingale measure for exponential Lévy models. Quant. Finance 6, 125–145. Google Scholar
[11]Jacod, J. and Shiryaev, A. N. (2003). Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kabanov, J. M., Lipcer, R. Š. and Širjaev, A. N. (1979). Absolute continuity and singularity of locally absolutely continuous probability distributions. I. Math. USSR-Sbornik 35, 631–680. Google Scholar
[13]Kabanov, J. M., Lipcer, R. Š. and Širjaev, A. N. (1981). On the representation of integral-valued random measures and local martingales by means of random measures with deterministic compensators. Math. USSR-Sbornik 39, 267–280. Google Scholar
[14]Kallsen, J. (2004). σ-localization and σ-martingales. Theory Prob. Appl. 48, 152–163. Google Scholar
[15]Kallsen, J. and Muhle-Karbe, J. (2010). Exponentially affine martingales, affine measure changes and exponential moments of affine processes. Stoch. Process. Appl. 120, 163–181. Google Scholar
[16]Kallsen, J. and Muhle-Karbe, J. (2010). Utility maximization in models with conditionally independent increments. Ann. Appl. Prob. 20, 2162–2177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kallsen, J. and Shiryaev, A. N. (2002). The cumulant process and Esscher's change of measure. Finance Stoch. 6, 397–428. Google Scholar
[18]Kassberger, S. and Liebmann, T. (2011). Minimal q-entropy martingale measures for exponential time-changed Lévy processes. Finance Stoch. 15, 117–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Liptser, R. S. and Shiryaev, A. N. (1989). Theory of Martingales. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar
[20]Nicolato, E. and Venardos, E. (2003). Option pricing in stochastic volatility models of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type. Math. Finance 13, 445–466. Google Scholar
[21]Selivanov, A. V. (2005). On the martingale measures in exponential Lévy models. Theory Prob. Appl. 49, 261–274. Google Scholar
[22]Stein, E. M. and Stein, J. C. (1991). Stock price distributions with stochastic volatility: an analytic approach. Rev. Financial Studies 4, 727–752. Google Scholar
[23]Stroock, D. W. (2011). Probability Theory: An Analytic View, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar