No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Soil organic carbon-to-clay ratio as a proxy for land degradation: machine learning-based spatial prediction in semi-arid agricultural lands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 November 2025
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics are central to evaluating land degradation, particularly in semi-arid regions where monitoring SOC-to-clay ratios (an indicator proposed for assessing soil resilience but still debated) remains challenging. This study employs machine learning (ML) models, including Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting, Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), to spatially predict SOC-to-clay ratios across part of Şanlıurfa province, Türkiye, a semi-arid region dominated by pistachio cultivation. The study area includes Typic Calcixerepts, Calcic Haploxerepts and Typic Haplotorrerts, reflecting diverse pedological conditions. The efficacy of SOC-to-clay ratio was evaluated relative to a soil quality index (SQI) and identified texture-dependent biases. Results revealed soil texture as the dominant predictor, explaining 34-65% of variance across models, surpassing land use (7–12%). Pasturelands exhibited the highest ratios (0.21–0.47), classified as ‘very good’, due to minimal disturbance and sustained organic inputs, while croplands and pistachio systems showed ‘moderate degradation’ (≤0.26). A moderate correlation between SOC-to-clay ratio and SQI (r = 0.51) supported its utility, though low explanatory power (R2 = 0.26) suggests complementary indicators are needed to correct for ratio inflation in low-clay soils. Spatial predictions support EU Soil Strategy 2030 priorities, advocating for reduced tillage in croplands and perennial vegetation in pasturelands.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Crops and Soils Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abakay, O, Kılıç, M, Günal, H, Kılıç, OM (2024) Tree-based algorithms for spatial modeling of soil particle distribution in arid and semi-arid region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 196, 264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12431-6
Google Scholar
Amsili, JP, van Es, HM, Schindelbeck, RR (2021) Cropping system and soil texture shape soil health outcomes and scoring functions. Soil Security 4, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2021.100012
Google Scholar
Andrews, SS, Karlen, DL, Cambardella, CA (2004) The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68(6), 1945–1962. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945
Google Scholar
Barrena-González, J, Antoneli, V, Contador, JFL, Fernández, MP (2024) Assessing how grazing intensity affects the spatial distribution of soil properties. Earth Systems and Environment 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00539-1
Google Scholar
Blake, GR, Hardge, KH (1986) Bulk Density In Klute, A (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 363–375. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
Google Scholar
Bouyoucos, GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils, Agronomy Journal 54(5), 464–465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
Google Scholar
Breiman, L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Google Scholar
Brus, DJ, de Gruijter, JJ (1997) Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80(1-2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00072-4
Google Scholar
Budak, M, Günal, E, Kılıç, M, Çelik, İ, Sırrı, M, Acir, N (2023) Improvement of spatial estimation for soil organic carbon stocks in Yuksekova plain using Sentinel 2 imagery and gradient descent–boosted regression tree. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(18), 53253–53274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26064-8
Google Scholar
Bünemann, EK, Bongiorno, G, Bai, Z, Creamer, RE, De Deyn, G, De Goede, R, … Brussaard, L (2018) Soil quality-A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 120, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030
Google Scholar
Chahal, I, Amsili, JP, Saurette, DD, Bower, JA, Gillespie, AW, van Es, HM, Van Eerd, LL (2024) Soil organic carbon to clay ratio in different pedoclimatic and agronomic conditions in northeastern North America. Geoderma Regional 39, e00893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00893
Google Scholar
Chicco, D, Warrens, MJ, Jurman, G (2021) The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj Computer Science 7, e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623
Google Scholar
Choudhury, BU, Mandal, S (2021) Indexing soil properties through constructing minimum datasets for soil quality assessment of surface and profile soils of intermontane valley (Barak, North East India). Ecological Indicators 123, 107369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107369
Google Scholar
Cuo, M, Xu, L, Yuan, B, Nie, Y, Wei, J (2025) Pastureland soil organic carbon storage regulated by pasture species and age under nitrogen and water addition in Northern China. Agronomy 15, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020399
Google Scholar
De Rosa, D, Ballabio, C, Lugato, E, Fasiolo, M, Jones, A, Panagos, P (2024) Soil organic carbon stocks in European croplands and grasslands: how much have we lost in the past decade?. Global Change Biology 30(1), e16992. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16992
Google Scholar
Diaz-Gonzalez, FA, Vallejo, VE, Vuelvas, J, Patiño, D (2023) Estimating Soil Quality Indicators Using Remote Sensing Data: An Application of Machine Learning Regression Models, in: 2023 IEEE 6th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC). IEEE, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC58200.2023.10333526
Google Scholar
Dumitru, S, Paltineanu, C, Vizitiu, O, Domnariu, H (2024) Soil available phosphorous and potassium stocks related to environmental properties, land uses and soils. The Journal of Agricultural Science 162(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859624000339
Google Scholar
El Hassani, I, Masrour, T, Kourouma, N, Motte, D, Tavčar, J (2024) Integrating large language models for improved failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA): a framework and case study. Proceedings of the Design Society 4, 2019–2028.Google Scholar
ESRI (2018) ArcGIS Desktop 10.6. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
European Commission (2023) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law) COM 416 Final. Available online from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52023PC0416 (14 April 2025)Google Scholar
Feeney, CJ, Bentley, L, De Rosa, D, Panagos, P, Emmett, BA, Thomas, A, Robinson, DA (2024) Benchmarking soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration provides more robust soil health assessment than the SOC/clay ratio at European scale. Science of the Total Environment 951, 175642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175642
Google Scholar
Fisher, A, Rudin, C, Dominici, F (2019) All models are wrong, but many are useful: learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20(177), 1–81. https://doi.org/10.5555/3322706.3364536
Google Scholar
Galluzzi, G, Plaza, C, Priori, S, Giannetta, B, Zaccone, C (2024) Soil organic matter dynamics and stability: Climate vs. time. Science of the Total Environment 929, 172441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172441
Google Scholar
Hasan, SS, Zhen, L, Miah, MG, Ahamed, T, Samie, A (2020) Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: a review. Environmental Development 34, 100527.Google Scholar
Hassink, J (1997) The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles. Plant and Soil 191(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004213929699
Google Scholar
He, J, Dai, Q, Yi, X, Wang, Y, Peng, X, Yan, Y (2023) Soil water retention modulates effects of soil nutrients and stoichiometry on stability of organic carbon in a karst region, Southwestern China. Plant and Soil 489, 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06041-3
Google Scholar
Heung, B, Saurette, D, Bulmer, CE (2021) Digital Soil Mapping, in: Digging into Canadian Soils. University of Saskatchewan. Available online from: https://www.saskoer.ca/soilscience/chapter/digital-soil-mapping/ (Accessed 11 March 2025).Google Scholar
Hohenbrink, TL, Jackisch, C, Durner, W, Germer, K, Iden, SC, Kreiselmeier, J, Leuther, F, Metzger, JC, Naseri, M, Peters, A (2023) Soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity measured in a wide saturation range. Earth System Science Data 15, 4417–4432. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023
Google Scholar
Hounkpatin, KOL, Stendahl, J, Lundblad, M, Karltun, E (2021) Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific data. Soil 7, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-377-2021
Google Scholar
Huang, Z, Wang, X, Yuan, MH, Duan, WH, Xia, JY, Li, J, Zhao, YF (2025) Differential response of ecosystem service to restoration methods and restoration time in shallow landslide-prone areas. Land Degradation & Development 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5550
Google Scholar
Inci, Y, Gündoğan, R, Bilgili, AV, Ramazanoğlu, E (2023) Morphological, physical and chemical characteristics, classification and evaluation of soils formed on common parent materials in Şanlıurfa for forensic applications. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7(4), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10253621
Google Scholar
Isaaks, EH, Srivastava, RM (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
IUSS Working Group WRB (2022) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), Vienna, Austria. Available online from: https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/WRB_fourth_edition_2022-12-18.pdf (Accessed 1 March 2025).Google Scholar
Jenny, H (1941) Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology. Courier Corporation. Available online from: https://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=chla2900470#mode/1up (Accessed 15 Januaray 2025).Google Scholar
Jia, P, Zhang, J, Liang, Y, Zhang, S, Jia, K, Zhao, X (2024) The inversion of arid-coastal cultivated soil salinity using explainable machine learning and Sentinel-2. Ecological Indicators 166, 112364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112364
Google Scholar
Johannes, A, Matter, A, Schulin, R, Weisskopf, P, Baveye, PC, Boivin, B (2017) Optimal organic carbon values for soil structure quality of arable soils. Does clay content matter? Geoderma 302, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.021
Google Scholar
Karger, DN, Schmatz, DR, Dettling, G, Zimmermann, NE (2020) High-resolution monthly precipitation and temperature time series from 2006 to 2100. Scientific Data 7, 248. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00587-y
Google Scholar
Ke, G, Meng, Q, Finley, T, Wang, T, Chen, W, Ma, W, Ye, Q, Liu, TY (2017) Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3149–3157. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3294996.3295074
Google Scholar
Kum, G (2022) Spatial distribution and temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration in semi-arid regions:Şanlıurfa as a case study. Turkish Geography Journal 80, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1116059
Google Scholar
Lal, R (2017)
Soil Carbon Impacts on Functionality and Environmental Sustainability
. In Ersahin, S, Kapur, S, Akca, E, Namli, A, Erdogan, H, (eds.), Carbon Management, Technologies, and Trends in Mediterranean Ecosystems. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Lanjewar, MG, Morajkar, PP, Parab, JS (2023) Hybrid method for accurate starch estimation in adulterated turmeric using Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Food Additives and Contaminations Part A 40, 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2023.2241557
Google Scholar
Loeppert, RH, Suarez, DL (1996) Carbonate and gypsum. In Sparks, DL (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3, Chemical Methods pp. 437–474. SSSA Book Series. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c15
Google Scholar
Loria, N, Lal, R, Chandra, R (2024) Handheld in situ methods for soil organic carbon assessment. Sustainability 16(13), 5592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135592
Google Scholar
Lu, Q, Tian, S, Wei, L (2023) Digital mapping of soil pH and carbonates at the European scale using environmental variables and machine learning. Science of the Total Environment 856, 159171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159171
Google Scholar
Maitry, A, Patil, G, Dubey, P (2025) Seasonal analysis of Physico-chemical parameters of mine soil under various forest tree species in Nandini limestone mines, Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research, 7(2), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646781.2025.v7.i2a.260
Google Scholar
Mäkipää, R, Menichetti, L, Martínez-García, E, Törmänen, T, Lehtonen, A (2024) Is the organic carbon-to-clay ratio a reliable indicator of soil health?. Geoderma 444, 116862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116862
Google Scholar
MGM (2025) Climate Classification, Şanlıurfa. Available online from: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/iklim/iklim-siniflandirmalari.aspx?m=SANLIURFA (Accessed 22 January 2025).Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A, Lal, R (2014) Comparison of soil quality index using three methods. PloS One 9(8), e105981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105981
Google Scholar
NASA (2022) Aster Global Digital Elevation Model V003 [WWW Document]. Natl. Aeronaut. Sp. Adm. https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003
Google Scholar
Nelson, DW, Sommers, LE (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. Keeney, D.R. (Ed) 2nd Ed. SSSA. Inc. Pub., Madison, Wisconsin. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
Google Scholar
Nunes, MR, Veum, KS, Parker, PA, Holan, SH, Karlen, DL, Amsili, JP, … Moorman, TB (2021) The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 85(4), 1196–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20244
Google Scholar
Özcan, A (1974) Geology of the area covering the province of Urfa. M.T.A. Report, Ankara, 19 p. (in Turkish).Google Scholar
Paltineanu, C, Domnariu, H, Mocanu, V, Dumitru, S (2025a) Assessing soils’ health by using soil organic carbon (SOC) content, SOC/clay ratio and mean SOC reference values: a case study on Romanian mineral soils. The Journal of Agricultural Science 163(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859625000280
Google Scholar
Paltineanu, C, Mocanu, V, Vizitiu, O, Domnariu, H, Dumitru, S (2025b) Soil organic carbon to clay ratio and bulk density related to some basic soil variables in Romania. Soil Use and Management 41(1), e70065. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.70065
Google Scholar
Panagos, P, Montanarella, L, Barbero, M, Schneegans, A, Aguglia, L, Jones, A (2022) Soil priorities in the European Union. Geoderma Regional 29, e00510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00510
Google Scholar
Parewai, I, Köppen, M (2025) A digital twin approach for soil moisture measurement with physically based rendering simulations and machine learning. Electronics 14, 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14020395
Google Scholar
Pavlovic, M, Ilic, S, Ralevic, N, Antonic, N, Raffa, DW, Bandecchi, M, Culibrk, D (2024) A deep learning approach to estimate soil organic carbon from remote sensing. Remote Sensing 16(4), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040655
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F, Varoquaux, G, Gramfort, A, Michel, V, Thirion, B, Grisel, O, Blondel, M, Prettenhofer, P, Weiss, R, Dubourg, V, Vanderplas, J, Passos, A, Cournapeau, D, Brucher, M, Perrot, M, Duchesnay, É (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.5555/1953048.2078195
Google Scholar
Poeplau, C, Don, A (2023) A simple soil organic carbon level metric beyond the organic carbon-to-clay ratio. Soil Use and Management 39(3), 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12921
Google Scholar
Prout, JM, Shepherd, KD, McGrath, SP, Kirk, GJ, Haefele, SM (2021) What is a good level of soil organic matter? An index based on organic carbon to clay ratio. European Journal of Soil Science 72(6), 2493–2503. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13012
Google Scholar
Prout, JM, Shepherd, KD, McGrath, SP, Kirk, GJ, Hassall, KL, Haefele, SM (2022) Changes in organic carbon to clay ratios in different soils and land uses in England and Wales over time. Scientific Reports 12(1), 5162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09101-3
Google Scholar
Qi, YB, Darilek, JL, Biao, H, YongCun, Z, WeiXia, S, ZhiQuan, G (2009) Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma 149, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.015
Google Scholar
Rabot, E, Saby, NP, Martin, MP, Barré, P, Chenu, C, Cousin, I, Arrouays, D, Angers, D, Bispo, A (2024) Relevance of the organic carbon to clay ratio as a national soil health indicator. Geoderma 443, 116829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116829
Google Scholar
Rhoades, JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Sparks, DL (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3, Chemical Methods pp. 417–436. SSSA Book Series. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14
Google Scholar
Sanchez, PA (2019) Properties and management of soils in the tropics. Soil Science 124, 187. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197709000-00012
Google Scholar
Sánchez-Navarro, V, Zornoza, R, Faz, A, Fernandez, JA (2019) Comparing legumes for use in multiple cropping to enhance soil organic carbon, soil fertility, aggregates stability and vegetables yields under semi-arid conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 246, 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.065
Google Scholar
Semeraro, S, Tuchschmid, R, Gobat, JM, Rasmann, S, Le Bayon, RC (2025) Temporal changes in soil properties: insights from a 37-years-old Swiss soil library. Geoderma 459, 117363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117363
Google Scholar
Six, J, Conant, RT, Paul, EA, Paustian, K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil 241(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2022) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 13th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/guides-and-instructions/keys-to-soil-taxonomy (Accessed 28 December 2024)Google Scholar
Stewart, CE, Paustian, K, Conant, RT, Plante, AF, Six, J (2008) Soil carbon saturation: evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.014
Google Scholar
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R, Nabiollahi, K, Minasny, B, Triantafilis, J (2015) Comparing data mining classifiers to predict spatial distribution of USDA-family soil groups in Baneh region, Iran. Geoderma 253, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.008
Google Scholar
Thomas, GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In Sparks, DL, Page, AL, Helmke, PA, Loeppert, RH, Soltanpour, PN, Tabatabai, MA, Johnston, CT, Sumner, ME (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3, Chemical Methods. ASA, CSSA, SSSA Book Series, pp. 5, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
Google Scholar
Trentin, C, Ampatzidis, Y, Lacerda, C, Shiratsuchi, L (2024) Tree crop yield estimation and prediction using remote sensing and machine learning: a systematic review. Smart Agricultural Technolology 9, 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100556
Google Scholar
Wadoux, AMC, Minasny, B, McBratney, AB (2020) Machine learning for digital soil mapping: applications, challenges and suggested solutions. Earth-Science Reviews 210, 103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359
Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Yu, Q, Avirmed, B, Zhao, J, Sun, W, Liu, Y, … Bayanmunkh, G (2025) The response of ecosystem services to ecological spatial network patterns in China’s arid and semi-arid regions. Ecological Indicators 172, 113300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113300
Google Scholar
Wenzel, WW, Golestanifard, A, Duboc, O (2024) SOC: clay ratio: a mechanistically-sound, universal soil health indicator across ecological zones and land use categories?. Geoderma 452, 117080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117080
Google Scholar
Wiesmeier, M, Urbanski, L, Hobley, E, Lang, B, von Lützow, M, Marin-Spiotta, E, Wesemael, B van, Rabot, E, Ließ, M, Garcia-Franco, N, Wollschläger, U, Vogel, HJ, Kögel-Knabner, I (2019) Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils-A review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma 333, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.026
Google Scholar
Willmott, CJ, Matsuura, K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research 30(1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079
Google Scholar
Yang, J, Li, L, Xu, Y, Yu, Y, Virk, AL, Li, FM, Yang, H, Kan, ZR (2024) Effects of straw biochar on microbial-derived carbon: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 368, 122233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122233
Google Scholar
Yang, X, Bao, Y, Li, B, Wang, R, Sun, C, Ma, D, Chen, L, Zou, H, Zhang, J (2024) Effects of fertilization applications on soil aggregate organic carbon content and assessment of their influencing factors: a meta-analysis. Catena 242, 108135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108135
Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Li, H, Sun, M, Liu, X, Cao, L (2024) A study on hyperspectral soil moisture content prediction by incorporating a hybrid neural network into stacking ensemble learning. Agronomy 14, 2054. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092054
Google Scholar
Kılıç et al. supplementary material 1
Kılıç et al. supplementary material
File
2.1 MB
Kılıç et al. supplementary material 2
Kılıç et al. supplementary material
File
485.6 KB
Kılıç et al. supplementary material 3
Kılıç et al. supplementary material
File
19.3 KB
Kılıç et al. supplementary material 4
Kılıç et al. supplementary material
File
58.6 KB
Kılıç et al. supplementary material 5
Kılıç et al. supplementary material
File
28.8 KB