Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:55:31.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dynamic Differential Demand System: An Application of Translation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Mark G. Brown  and
Jong-Ying Lee
Mark G. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainsville
Jong-Ying Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainsville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The differential demand system or Rotterdam model is extended to include lagged consumption through translation parameters, allowing habit and inventory effects. Applications of the model to annual U.S. expenditure and weekly juice sales data illustrate the importance of the time interval of an observation on the relative strengths of the habit inventory.

Keywords

dynamic differential demand systemtranslationhabitshousehold inventories

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , December 1992 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnett, W. A. “On the Flexibility of the Rotterdam Model: A First Empirical Look.” Eur. Econ. Rev., 24(1984):285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Theorie en empire van een volledig stelsel van vraagvergelijkingen.” PhD dissertation, University of Rotterdam, 1966.Google Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations.” Eur. Econ. Rev., 1(1969): 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, R.Allocation Models: Specification, Estimation and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1986.Google Scholar
Byron, R. P. “On the Flexibility of the Rotterdam Model.” Eur. Econ. Rev., 24(1984):273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. S. “The Analysis of Consumer Demand in the United Kingdom, 1900–1970.” Econometrica, 42(1974):341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J.. Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, W. M. “Tricks with Utility Functions.” In Essays in Economic Analysis, Artis, M. J. and Nobay, A. R., eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H., and Taylor, L. D.. Consumer Demand in the United States, 1929–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Jackson, L. R. “Hierarchic Demand and the Engel Curve.” Rev. of Econ. and Stat., 66(1984):8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. R., Hassan, Z. A., and Green, R. D.. Demand System Estimation: Methods and Applications. Ames: The Iowa State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mountain, D. C. “The Rotterdam Model: An Approximation in Variable Space.” Econometrica, 56(1988): 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phlips, L.Applied Consumption Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Pollak, R. A., and Wales, T. J.. “Estimation of the Linear Expenditure System.” Econometrica, 37(1969): 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, R. A., and Wales, T. J.. “Comparison of the Quadratic Expenditure System and Translog Demand Systems with Alternative Specifications of Demographic Effects.” Econometrica, 48(1980):595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, R. A., and Wales, T. J.. “Demographic Variables in Demand Analysis.” Econometrica, 49(1981): 1533–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexauer, B. “The Role of Habits and Stocks in Consumer Expenditure.” Quart. J. Econ., 91(1979):127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, L.Thérie des choix et fonctions de consummation semi-agrégées. Geneva: Librarie Droz, 1971.Google Scholar
Theil, H. “The Information Approach to Demand Analysis.” Econometrica, 33(1965):67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
Theil, H.Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand, Vol. I and II. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1975, 1976.Google Scholar
Theil, H.The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Theil, H., Chung, Ching-Fan, and Seale, J.L. Jr. International Evidence on Consumption Patterns. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
Tilley, D. S. “Importance of Understanding Consumption Dynamics in Market Recovery Periods.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 2(1979):41–46.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. “The National Income and Product Accounts of the United States, 1929–82.” Supplement to the Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.: September, 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Business Statistics, 1961–88.” Supplement to the Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.: December, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.: 70.9 (1990).Google Scholar