Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-zzvtc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-10T18:41:40.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Co-Constitution of Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2021

Marcos Tourinho Open the ORCID record for Marcos Tourinho [Opens in a new window]
Get access

Abstract

The idea of liberal international order as a world order is understood to be constituted as a result of disproportionate Anglo-American influences. This is in line with much of international relations (IR) theory, which typically characterizes the emergence of order as resulting from the diffusion or imposition of norms and institutions from the world's centers of power. This article argues otherwise, its premise being that the international order founded on sovereign equal nation-states was co-constituted as well by the influence of relatively weak actors through decentralized processes of contestation over core international norms. Drawing on international relations, history, and law, this article outlines a framework to interpret the actions and mechanisms by which supposedly weak actors shaped international order. It concisely traces the constitution of order as based on its fundamental norms and assesses the implications of the argument for the current crisis of liberal order, as well as IR theory more broadly, laying out a research agenda for the future.

Keywords

International ordernormspolitical contestationcounterhegemonyglobal IR

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abou-El-Fadl, Reem. 2015. Early Pan-Arabism in Egypt's July Revolution: The Free Officers’ Political Formation and Policy-Making, 1946–54. Nations and Nationalism 21 (2):289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2020. Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents. International Organization 75 (2).<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454>.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. 1967. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies: (Sixteenth, Seventeenth, and Eighteenth Centuries). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Alejandro. 1924. The Monroe Doctrine: Its Importance in the International Life of the States of the New World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin, Cemil. 2007. The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 1985. Economic Statecraft. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barraclough, Geoffrey. 1967. An Introduction to Contemporary History. Penguin.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher Alan. 2004. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, Arnulf. 2010. Universal International Law: Nineteenth-Century Histories of Imposition and Appropriation. Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2):475–552.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, Arnulf. 2014. Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren A. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagavan, Manu Belur. 2013. India and the Quest for One World: The Peacemakers. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J. 2009. The Parochialism of Hegemony: Challenges for “American” International Relations. In International Relations Scholarship Around the World, edited by Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole, 308–27. Routledge.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas. 2014. Dialectical Reflections on Transformations of Global Security During the Long Twentieth Century. Globalizations 11 (5):711–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, Edwin. 1928. The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad: Or, the Law of International Claims. Banks Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2021. Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2).<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Búzás, Zoltán. 2021. Racism and Antiracism in the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2).<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000521>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael. 2000. The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2003. International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? Zed Books for the United Nations University.Google Scholar
Cortright, David. 2008. Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Jurkovich, Michelle. 2014. Getting a Seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences. Global Governance 20 (3):361–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Jörg. 1984. Die europäische Expansion und das Völkerrecht. Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg. 2012. Peoples and Nations. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 27–48. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg. 2015a. Is Colonialism an Offspring of Modern International Law? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg. 2015b. The Right of Self-Determination of Peoples: The Domestication of an Illusion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1988. Legitimacy in the International System. Source: The American Journal of International Law 82 (4):705–59.Google Scholar
Gerits, Frank. 2015. “When the Bull Elephants Fight”: Kwame Nkrumah, Non-Alignment, and Pan-Africanism As an Interventionist Ideology in the Global Cold War (1957–66). International History Review 37 (5):951–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovogui, Siba N'Zatioula. 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. Boderlines. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Handel, Michael I. 1981. Weak States in the International System. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona Anne, and Shapiro, Scott. 2017. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. 2014. Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Ian. 2003. Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument. European Journal of International Law 14 (3):437–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles. 2014. International Relations in the Americas During the Long Eighteenth Century, 1663–1820. In International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West, edited by Suzuki, Shogo, Zhang, Yongjin, and Quirk, Joel, 118–37. Routledge.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2014. The Standard of “Civilisation,” the Expansion Thesis and the Nineteenth-Century International Social Space. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (3):651–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1969. Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organization 23 (2):291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M. 2011. The Image Before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction Between Combatant and Civilian. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Robert A. 1974. Sovereign Equality Among States: The History of an Idea. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2000. How Do Norms Matter? In The Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael, 35–68. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2005. International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order. European Journal of International Law 16 (3):369–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 1998. After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity. International Security 23 (2):40–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Martin, Lisa L., and Risse, Thomas. 2021. Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization 75 (2).<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000636>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Tom. 2015. Latin America Confronts the United States: Asymmetry and Influence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matin, Kamran. 2013. Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2):353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2009. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Mazrui, Ali A. 2005. Pan-Africanism and the Intellectuals: Rise, Decline and Revival. In African Intellectuals: Rethinking Politics, Language, Gender, and Development, edited by Mkandawire, Thandika, 56–77. Zed Books.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3): 190–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muppidi, Himadeep. 2004. Colonial and Postcolonial Global Governance. In Power in Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, 273–93. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nys, Ernest. 1893. Les origines du droit international. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Obregón, Liliana. 2005. Colluding Worlds of the Lawyer, the Scholar and the Policy Maker: A View of International Law from Latin America. Wisconsin International Law Journal 23:145.Google Scholar
Prashad, Vijay. 2007. The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World. The New PressGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Adam. 2003. Order/Justice Issues at the United Nations. In Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Foot, Rosemary, Gaddis, John Lewis, and Hurrell, Andrew, 49–79. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Adam, and Ash, Timothy Garton. 2009. Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Gandhi to the Present. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2):379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg. 1964. Power Politics: A Study of World Society. 3rd ed. Stevens.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Kirsten. 2012. Delegitimizing Aggression: First Steps and False Starts After the First World War. Journal of International Criminal Justice 10 (1):7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2001. Two Liberalisms. European Journal of International Law 12 (3):537–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Gerry J. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization 39 (4):579–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2005. Japan's Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2011. The Practice of Political Manipulation. In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 255–79. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2006. Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. Discord and Collaboration; Essays on International Politics. Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge Studies In International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar