Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-v48vw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-25T02:22:16.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of methods of measuring the persistence of neutralizing and haemagglutinin-inhibiting antibodies to louping ill virus in experimentally infected sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

K. J. O'Reilly ,
C. E. Gordon Smith ,
D. A. McMahon ,
E. T. W. Bowen  and
G. White
K. J. O'Reilly
Affiliation:
Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent
C. E. Gordon Smith
Affiliation:
Microbiological Research Establishment, Salisbury, Wilts.
D. A. McMahon
Affiliation:
Microbiological Research Establishment, Salisbury, Wilts.
E. T. W. Bowen
Affiliation:
Microbiological Research Establishment, Salisbury, Wilts.
G. White
Affiliation:
Wellcome Veterinary Research Station, Frant
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sheep, after infection with louping ill virus and after re-infection with the same strain of virus 19–21 months later, were bled at intervals and their sera examined for neutralizing and haemagglutinin-inhibiting antibodies. Each antibody type was measured by the constant serum/variable virus and constant virus/variable serum methods. The persistence of each type of antibody and its significance in epidemiological studies is discussed. The relationship of antibody levels in ewes and their lambs was also examined.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 217 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1958). Techniques for haemagglutination and haemagglutination inhibition with arthropod borne viruses. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 7, 561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gresikova, M. & Sekeyova, M. (1967). Non-specific inhibitors of arboviruses in animal sera. Acta virol., Prague 11, 108.Google Scholar
Howie, J. W., Barr, M. & Glenny, A. T. (1953). The effect of diet and the interval between toxoid injections upon diphtheria-antitoxin levels in Blackface ewes and their lambs. J. Path. Bact. 65, 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reilly, K. J., Smith, C. E. G., McMahon, D. A., Wilson, A. L. & Robertson, J. M. (1965). Infection of sheep and monkeys with Langat virus: cross-protection against other viruses of the Russian spring-summer complex. J. Hyg. Camb. 63, 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. (1938). A simple method of estimating 50 per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27, 493.Google Scholar
Sever, J. L. (1962). Application of a microtechnique to viral serological investigations. J. Immun. 88, 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. E. G. (1967). Comparability in long-term arbovirus antibody surveys. Symposia Series in Immunobiological Standardisation, 4. Immunological Methods of Biological Standardisation, p. 263. Karger, Basel/New York.Google Scholar
Smith, C. E. G., McMahon, D. A., O'Reilly, K. J., Wilson, A. L. & Robertson, J. M. (1964). The epidemiology of louping ill in Ayrshire: the first year of studies in sheep. J. Hyg., Camb. 62, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. E. G. & Westgarth, D. R. (1957). The use of survival time in the analysis of neutralization tests for serum antibody surveys. J. Hyg., Camb. 55, 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterne, M., Batty, I., Thomson, A. & Robertson, J. M. (1962). Immunization of sheep with multi-component clostridial vaccine. Vet. Rec. 74, 909.Google Scholar
Verani, P. & Gresikova, M. (1966). Study on non-specific inhibitors of arboviruses in human sera. Acta virol., Prague 10, 241.Google Scholar
Williams, H. & Thorburn, H. (1961). The serological response of sheep to infection with louping ill virus. J. Hyg., Camb. 59, 437.Google ScholarPubMed