Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 5
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kalashnikov, Dmitri A. Davenport, Frances V. Labe, Zachary M. Loikith, Paul C. Abatzoglou, John T. and Singh, Deepti 2024. Predicting Cloud‐To‐Ground Lightning in the Western United States From the Large‐Scale Environment Using Explainable Neural Networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 129, Issue. 22,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Jiang, Shijie Sweet, Lily‐belle Blougouras, Georgios Brenning, Alexander Li, Wantong Reichstein, Markus Denzler, Joachim Shangguan, Wei Yu, Guo Huang, Feini and Zscheischler, Jakob 2024. How Interpretable Machine Learning Can Benefit Process Understanding in the Geosciences. Earth's Future, Vol. 12, Issue. 7,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Qiao, Xiaojun Chu, Tianxing Krell, Evan Tissot, Philippe Holland, Seneca Ahmed, Mohamed and Smilovsky, Danielle 2024. Interpretation and Attribution of Coastal Land Subsidence: An InSAR and Machine Learning Perspective. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 17, Issue. , p. 4768.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cheremisina, Eugenia N. Kirpicheva, Elena Yu. Tokareva, Nadezhda A. and Milovidova, Anna A. 2024. Basic artificial Intelligence tasks in сontext of geological prospecting. Geoinformatika, p. 83.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Krell, Evan Mamalakis, Antonios King, Scott A. Tissot, Philippe and Ebert-Uphoff, Imme 2025. The influence of correlated features on neural network attribution methods in geoscience. Environmental Data Science, Vol. 4, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Aspire website

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Aggregation strategies to improve XAI for geoscience models that use correlated, high-dimensional rasters
  • Volume 2
  • Evan Krell (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4), Hamid Kamangir (a3) (a4), Waylon Collins (a5) (a4), Scott A. King (a1) (a2) (a4) and Philippe Tissot (a3) (a4)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.39
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Aggregation strategies to improve XAI for geoscience models that use correlated, high-dimensional rasters
  • Volume 2
  • Evan Krell (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4), Hamid Kamangir (a3) (a4), Waylon Collins (a5) (a4), Scott A. King (a1) (a2) (a4) and Philippe Tissot (a3) (a4)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.39
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Aggregation strategies to improve XAI for geoscience models that use correlated, high-dimensional rasters
  • Volume 2
  • Evan Krell (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4), Hamid Kamangir (a3) (a4), Waylon Collins (a5) (a4), Scott A. King (a1) (a2) (a4) and Philippe Tissot (a3) (a4)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.39
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.