Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:44:56.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coupling law enforcement and community-based regulations in support of compliance with biodiversity conservation regulations

Part of: Multi-dimensionality of the biodiversity crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

Fidelis Akunke Atuo Open the ORCID record for Fidelis Akunke Atuo [Opens in a new window] ,
Jun Fu ,
Timothy John O’Connell Open the ORCID record for Timothy John O’Connell [Opens in a new window] ,
Jonathan Akomaye Agida  and
Jennifer Arubemi Agaldo
Fidelis Akunke Atuo*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, 223 Rhodes Hall, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO63701, USA Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 008C Agricultural Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Jun Fu
Affiliation:
School of Educational Foundations, Leadership and Aviation, 220 Willard Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Timothy John O’Connell
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 008C Agricultural Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Jonathan Akomaye Agida
Affiliation:
Life Empowerment Foundation, 60/65 Ndidem Usang Iso Road, Calabar, Nigeria
Jennifer Arubemi Agaldo
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch8020, New Zealand
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Fidelis Akunke Atuo, Email: fatuo@semo.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The scope and scale of wildlife crimes around the world have risen in intensity and complexity, yet current enforcement strategies have often not delivered desired effects on illegal activities, even within protected areas. Tackling the array of illegal activities by emphasizing law enforcement above other options is challenging and potentially unsustainable. We explored the potential for social norms, community regulations and socioeconomic factors to promote compliance with wildlife laws by interviewing 334 respondents in 28 villages that share boundaries with protected areas in Nigeria. Using an anonymous direct questioning approach, we recorded a high prevalence of non-compliance behaviours in all studied communities. Injunctive norms (i.e., perceptions of acceptable behaviour within a social group) significantly predicted compliance, as respondents with no complicit friends or family members were more likely to comply with wildlife regulations. Perceived likelihood of community-level sanctions played a more salient role than the fear of arrest by rangers in influencing compliance. In addition, non-compliance increased with number of dependents, but reduced with average monthly household income. Our study demonstrates that clear knowledge of the social norms that drive local behaviour as well as the authorities that enforce them is integral to understanding the forces that drive community involvement and participation in conservation. Incorporating local communities in planning enforcement interventions may help protect threatened species and landscapes.

Keywords

community-based conservationcomplianceplanned behavioursocial normstraditional authoritieswildlife crime

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 104 - 112
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agaldo, J, Gwom, T, Apeverga, P (2016) An assessment of present threats and associated conservation implication to the Oban division Forest Cross river national park; Nigeria’s biodiversity hotspot. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management 9: 938–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A, Gibson, CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action Control, pp. 11–39. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I, Madden, TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22: 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, A (2015) Understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context. Journal of Environmental Management 153: 134–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1175–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atuo, FA, Abanyam, PU, O’Connell, TJ (2015) An assessment of socio-economic drivers of avian body parts trade in West African rainforests. Biological Conservation 191: 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atuo, FA, Ivande, ST, Wala, Z, O’Connell, TJ (2014) Effects of hunting camps on breeding grey-necked picathartes Picathartes oreas in south-east Nigeria. Oryx 48: 460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayuk, AA, Owan, EJ (2013) Traditional methods of crime control and community security in Odukpani local government area of Cross River State – Nigeria. Journal of Humanities and Social Science 14: 61–66.Google Scholar
Banner, KM, Higgs, MD (2017) Considerations for assessing model averaging of regression coefficients. Ecological Applications 27: 78–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoń, K (2019) Multi-model inference (MuMIn). R package version 1.15.6.2016 [www document] URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bennett, EL (2011) Another inconvenient truth: the failure of enforcement systems to save charismatic species. Oryx 45: 476–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, NJ, Dearden, P (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy 44: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergl, RA, Oates, JF, Fotso, R (2007) Distribution and protected area coverage of endemic taxa in West Africa’s Biafran forests and highlands. Biological Conservation 134: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergl, RA, Warren, Y, Nicholas, A, Dunn, A, Imong, I, Sunderland-Groves, JL, Oates, JFJO (2012) Remote sensing analysis reveals habitat, dispersal corridors and expanded distribution for the critically endangered Cross River gorilla Gorilla gorilla diehli. Oryx 46: 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergseth, BJ, Gurney, GG, Barnes, ML, Arias, A, Cinner, JE (2018) Addressing poaching in marine protected areas through voluntary surveillance and enforcement. Nature Sustainability 1: 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F, Colding, J, Folke, C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragagnolo, C, Correia, R, Malhado, AC, De Marins, M, Ladle, RJ (2017) Understanding non-compliance: local people’s perceptions of natural resource exploitation inside two national parks in northeast Brazil. Journal for Nature Conservation 40: 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, JS, Waylen, KA, Mulder, MB (2012) How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 21265–21270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Cade, BS (2015) Model averaging and muddled multimodel inferences. Ecology 96: 2370–2382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castilho, LC, De Vleeschouwer, KM, Milner-Gulland, E, Schiavetti, A (2018) Attitudes and behaviors of rural residents toward different motivations for hunting and deforestation in protected areas of the northeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science 11: 1940082917753507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetas, ER, Yasué, M (2017) A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conservation Biology 31: 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Challender, DW, MacMillan, DC (2014) Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conservation Letters 7: 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, RB, Kallgren, CA, Reno, RR (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234.Google Scholar
Clifford, W (1974) An Introduction to African Criminology. Nairobi, Kenya: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conner, M, Sparks, P (1996) The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In: Predicting Health Behaviour, eds Conner, M, Norman, P, pp. 121–162. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Critchlow, R, Plumptre, AJ, Alidria, B, Nsubuga, M, Driciru, M, Rwetsiba, Aet al. (2017) Improving law-enforcement effectiveness and efficiency in protected areas using ranger-collected monitoring data. Conservation Letters 10: 572–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A, Bergl, R, Byler, D, Eben-Ebai, S, Etiendem, DN, Fotso, Ret al. (2014) Revised Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) 2014–2019. Washington, DC, USA: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group and Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Ezebilo, EE (2013) Nature conservation in Cross River National Park, south-east Nigeria: promoting collaboration between local people and conservation authorities. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 9: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezebilo, EE, Mattsson, L (2010) Socio-economic benefits of protected areas as perceived by local people around Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrass, A, Nuno, A, Bunnefeld, N, Milner-Gulland, EJ (2016) Investigating determinants of compliance with wildlife protection laws: bird persecution in Portugal. European Journal of Wildlife Research 62: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, G, Kok, G (1996) The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion 11: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gore, ML (2017) Global risks, conservation, and criminology. In: Conservation Criminology, pp. 1–23. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R, Arcese, P, Borner, M, Hando, J, Hopcraft, G, Loibooki, Met al. (2006) Effective enforcement in a conservation area. Science 314: 1266–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmern, T, Muya, J, Røskaft, E (2007) Local law enforcement and illegal bushmeat hunting outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 34: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachmann, H (2008) Monitoring law-enforcement performance in nine protected areas in Ghana. Biological Conservation 141: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, FAS, Mai, C-H, Pei, KJ-C (2015) Evaluating deterrents of illegal behaviour in conservation: carnivore killing in rural Taiwan. Biological Conservation 189: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, JS, Gore, ML (2012) Beyond the cooking pot and pocket book: factors influencing noncompliance with wildlife poaching rules. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 36: 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, JS, Gore, ML (2015) Local perceptions of risk associated with poaching of wildlife implicated in human–wildlife conflicts in Namibia. Biological Conservation 189: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, A, Jones, JP, Edwards-Jones, G, Milner-Gulland, EJ (2008) The sleeping policeman: understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation. Animal Conservation 11: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, A, Ramarolahy, AA, Jones, JP, Milner-Gulland, E (2011) Evidence for the effects of environmental engagement and education on knowledge of wildlife laws in Madagascar. Conservation Letters 4: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader-Williams, N, Milner-Gulland, E (1993) Policies for the enforcement of wildlife laws: the balance between detection and penalties in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Conservation Biology 7: 611–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, DM, Mwenya, A, Kaweche, G (1990) African Solution to Wildlife Problems in Africa: Insights from a Community-Based Project in Zambia. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Linkie, M, Martyr, DJ, Harihar, A, Risdianto, D, Nugraha, RT, Leader-Williams, N, Wong, WM (2015) Editor’s choice: Safeguarding Sumatran tigers: evaluating effectiveness of law enforcement patrols and local informant networks. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 851–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, TO, Wells, MP (2004) Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E, Fairbrass, A, Bunnefeld, N, Nuno, A (2016) Investigating determinants of compliance with wildlife protection laws: bird persecution in Portugal. European Journal of Wildlife Research 62: 93–101.Google Scholar
Moreto, WD, Brunson, RK, Braga, AA (2016) ‘Anything we do, we have to include the communities’: law enforcement rangers’ attitudes towards and experiences of community–ranger relations in wildlife protected areas in Uganda. British Journal of Criminology 57: 924–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreto, WD, Gau, JM (2017) Deterrence, legitimacy, and wildlife crime in protected areas. In: Conservation Criminology, pp. 45–58. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, BJ, Adeleke, A, Bassey, T, Bergl, R, Dunn, A, Fotso, Ret al. (2011) Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Nigeria–Cameroon Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes ellioti). Washington, DC, USA: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group and Zoological Society of San Diego.Google Scholar
Nilsson, D, Baxter, G, Butler, JR, McAlpine, CA (2016) How do community-based conservation programs in developing countries change human behaviour? A realist synthesis. Biological Conservation 200: 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J, Bergl, R, Linder, J. (2004) Africa’s Gulf of Guinea Forests: Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Priorities. Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science No. 6. Washington, DC, USA: Conservation International, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science.Google Scholar
Onojeghuo, AO, Blackburn, AG, Okeke, F, Onojeghuo, A (2015) Habitat suitability modeling of endangered primates in Nigeria: integrating satellite remote sensing and spatial modeling techniques. Journal of Geoscience and Environmental Protection 3: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onyeozili, EC (2005) Obstacles to effective policing in Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies 1: 32.Google Scholar
Oraegbunam, IK (2010) Crime and punishment in Igbo customary law: the challenge of Nigerian criminal jurisprudence. Ogirisi: A New Journal of African Studies 7: 1–31.Google Scholar
Rizzolo, JB, Gore, ML, Ratsimbazafy, JH, Rajaonson, A (2017) Cultural influences on attitudes about the causes and consequences of wildlife poaching. Crime, Law and Social Change 67: 415–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowcliffe, JM, de Merode, E, Cowlishaw, G (2004) Do wildlife laws work? Species protection and the application of a prey choice model to poaching decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271: 2631–2636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, PW, Nolan, JM, Cialdini, RB, Goldstein, NJ, Griskevicius, V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 18: 429–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, EA (2018) Compliance and Noncompliance with Environmental Rules in the Brazilian Pantanal. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, JN, Gavin, MC, Gore, ML (2015) Detecting and Understanding Non-Compliance with Conservation Rules. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struhsaker, TT, Struhsaker, PJ, Siex, KS (2005) Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, KA, Fischer, A, McGowan, PJ, Thirgood, SJ, Milner-Gulland, E (2010) Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conservation Biology 24: 1119–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellsmith, M (2011) Wildlife crime: the problems of enforcement. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, JH, Hill, NA, Roe, D, Rowcliffe, JM, Kümpel, NF, Day, Met al. (2016) Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods. Conservation Biology 30: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Atuo et al. supplementary material

Atuo et al. supplementary material

Download Atuo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.5 KB