Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-24T14:36:14.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparability and Value in Comic-to-Film Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2024

Henry John Pratt Open the ORCID record for Henry John Pratt [Opens in a new window]
Henry John Pratt*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
*
Email: henry.pratt@marist.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I argue, adverting to critical practices, that film adaptations are comparable with the comics that serve as their sources. The possibility of comparison presumes the existence of covering values according to which these comparisons are made. I raise four groupings of covering values for comics—narrative, pictorial, historical, and referential—and show how they apply to film adaptations as well, and argue that a fifth kind of value, fidelity, is relevant to comparisons of source comics to film adaptations. I close with a discussion of different types of fidelity that might be brought to bear in evaluation.

Keywords

adaptationcomparabilitycovering valuesfidelitycritical practicescomicsfilm

Information

Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 53 , Issue 7-8: Themed Issue: Philosophy of Comics , October 2023 , pp. 697 - 709
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrew, D. (1980). The Well-Worn Muse: Adaptation in film history and theory. In Conger, S., & Welsch, J. (Eds.), Narrative strategies (pp. 9–18). West Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Armitage, H. (2011, October 5). “DC Comics New 52: Grifter #1—Review.” Digital Spy. https://www.digitalspy.com/comics/a343787/dc-comics-new-52-grifter-1-review/Google Scholar
Bettencourt, D. (2019, April 12). “The Hellboy comics are great. The Hellboy movie is not.” Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/04/12/hellboy-comics-are-great-hellboy-movie-is-not/Google Scholar
Bragdon, W. (2021). “Graphic novel review: Hellboy, Seed of Destruction.” April 5, 2021. https://wallacebragdon.com/2021/04/05/graphic-novel-review-hellboy-seed-of-destruction/Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2009). On criticism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, R. (1997). Introduction. In Chang, R. (Ed.), Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason (pp. 1–34). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. (2007). Liking what’s good: Why shouldn’t We? In Irwin, W., & Gracia, J. J. E. (Eds.), Philosophy and the interpretation of pop culture (pp. 117–129). Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The principles of art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, R. T. (2011). Do comics require pictures? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 69(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01472.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. T. (2013). Canonicity and normativity in massive, serialized fiction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, S., & Cray, W. D. (2022). Philosophy of comics: An introduction. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Danto, A. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, S. (1987). The evaluation of music. In Alperson, P. (Ed.), What is music: An introduction to the philosophy of music (pp. 307–325). Haven Publications.Google Scholar
Davis, B. (2017). Movie comics: Page to screen/screen to page. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Capricorn.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1988). Evaluating Art. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Donato, M. (2019, April 10). “Hellboy Review.” WeGotThisCovered.com. https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/hellboy-review/Google Scholar
Gracyk, T. (2007). Listening to popular music: Or, how i learned to stop worrying and love Led Zeppelin. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. (1954). Logic and appreciation. In Elton, W. (Ed.), Aesthetics and language (pp. 161–169). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harold, J. (2018). The value of fidelity in adaptation. British Journal of Aesthetics, 58(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayx041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, A., & Uidhir, C. M. (2011). Unrealistic fictions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2019, April 22). “Hellboy.” Multiversity Comics. http://www.multiversitycomics.com/reviews/hellboy/Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1996 [1757]). Of the standard of taste. In Copley, S., & Edgar, A. (Eds.), Selected essays (pp. 133–153). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Land, A. (2022, August 7). “Mike Mignola’s Hellboy Remains the Best Monster Comic on the Market.” CBR.com. https://www.cbr.com/hellboy-mike-mignola-best-monster-comic-dark-horse/Google Scholar
Lefevre, P. (2008). Incompatible visual ontologies? The problematic adaptation of drawn images. In Gordon, I., Jancovich, M., & McAllister, M. (Eds.), Film and comic books (pp. 1–12). University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (1996). The pleasures of aesthetics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, P. (2010). On the appreciation of cinematic adaptations. Projections, 4(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2010.040207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luiz, H. C. (2022, November 25). “Finding the Good in Neil Marshall’s Hellboy Reboot.” Bloody Disgusting. https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3740132/finding-the-good-in-neil-marshalls-hellboy-reboot-the-silver-lining/Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. (1954). Some distinctive features of arguments used in criticism of the arts. In Elton, W. (Ed.), Aesthetics and language (pp. 114–130). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2022). A philosophy of cover songs. Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. (2019, April 13). “Hellboy Movie Review: One Hell of a Mess, and One Hell of a Ride.” Cnet.com. https://www.cnet.com/culture/entertainment/hellboy-movie-2019-review-one-hell-of-a-mess-one-hell-of-a-ride/Google Scholar
McFarlane, B. (1996). Novel to film: An introduction to the theory of adaptation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitaine, B., Roche, D., & Schmitt-Pitiot, I. (2015). Introduction: Adapting adaptations studies to comics studies. In Mitaine, B., Roche, D., & Schmitt-Pitot, I.. Trans. Rommens, A., & Roche, D. (Eds.), Comics and adaptation (pp. 3–28). University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Pratt, H. J. (2012b). Categories and comparisons of artworks. British Journal of Aesthetics, 52(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayr049Google Scholar
Pratt, H. J. (2023). The philosophy of comics: What they are, how they work, and why they matter. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, H. J. (2012a). Making comics into film. In (Cook, R. T., & Meskin, A.) (Eds.), The art of comics and graphic novels: A philosophical approach 147–164. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Theo. (n.d..) “Hellboy: Seed of Destruction Review.” Ninth Art Delights. https://www.ninthartdelights.com/hellboy-seed-of-destruction-review/Google Scholar
Vermazen, B. (1975). Comparing Evaluations of Works of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/428637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G. (1975). The novel and the cinema. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. (1970). Categories of art. Philosophical Review, 79(3), 334–367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23960983Google Scholar
Wisely, S. (2006, June 18). “The things they buried.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/books/review/18wilsey.htmlGoogle Scholar
Yoos, G. (1967). The work of art as a standard in itself. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 26(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac26.1.0081CrossRefGoogle Scholar