Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:38:05.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Centuries of Darkness: A Reply to Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Peter James ,
I. J. Thrope ,
Nikos Kokkinos ,
Robert Morkot  and
John Frankish
Peter James
Affiliation:
Department of Ancient HistoryUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 127 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Epigraphic Survey, 1970. MedinetHabu VIII: TheEastern High Gate. Chicago: Oriental Institute PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A.H., 1948. The Wilbour Papyrus II: Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Giddy, L.L., 1987. Egyptian Oases. Warminster: Aris & PhillipsGoogle Scholar
Hassan, F.A., 1991. A shot in the dark (review of Centuries of Darkness). Nature 353, 712–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P., Thorpe, I. J., Kokkinos, N., Morkot, R., & Frankish, J., 1991a. Centuries of Darkness. London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar
James, P., Thorpe, I.J., Kokkinos, N., Morkot, R., & Frankish, J., 1991b. Centuries of Darkness: context, methodology and implications. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(2), 228–35Google Scholar
Kitchen, K.A., 1986. The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt (1100–650 BC). 2nd ed with supplement. Warminster: Aris & PhillipsGoogle Scholar
Kokkinos, N., forthcoming. The Tyrian Annals and the chronology of the Judaean Kingdom. Studies in Ancient Chronology 3Google Scholar
Kuniholm, P., 1988. Dendrochronology and radiocarbon dates for Gordion and other Phrygian sites. Source. Notes in the History of Art 7 (3–4), 6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuniholm, P., 1990. Aegean Dendrochronology Project. Progress Report, December 1990. Privately circulated.Google Scholar
Millard, A., 1991. Texts and Archaeology: Weighing the Evidence. The Case for King Solomon. Palestine Excavation Quarterly 123, 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkot, R., 1987. Studies in New Kingdom Nubia, I. Politics, Economics and Ideology: Egyptian Imperialism in Nubia. Wepwawet 3, 29–49Google Scholar
Pilcher, J.R., Baillie, M.G.L., Schmidt, B., & Becker, B., 1984. A 7272-year tree-ring chronology for Western Europe. Nature 312, 150–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rageth, J., 1982. Die bronzezeitliche Siedlung auf dem Padnal bei Savignon (Oberhalbstein GR). Grabung 1978. Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte 65, 23–68Google Scholar
Sperber, L., 1987. Untersuchungen zur Chronologie der Urnenfelderkultur im nördlichen Alpenvorland von der Schweizbis Oberösterreich. Antiquitas, Reihe3, Band 29. Bonn: HabeltGoogle Scholar