Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-8cpv7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T13:19:11.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composing music, developing dialogues: An enactive perspective on children's collaborative creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2017

Ana Luísa Veloso
Ana Luísa Veloso*
Affiliation:
Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 602 4200–465 Porto Portugal anaveloso@ese.ipp.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to provide new insights on the nature of the embodied and collaborative processes related to the emergence of new musical ideas that occur when children are composing in groups.

Data was obtained by participant observation of the teacher/researcher and by ten videotaped one-hour musical sessions dedicated to the development of a music composition by two groups of children, all of whom were eight years old.

It was found that when composing in groups a) children use embodied processes to transform what they experience on diverse realms of their existence into musical ideas, and that b) while creating music, children engage in several improvisatory moments where new ideas emerge through the diverse ways they enact the surroundings where the activity is occurring. Findings suggest a conception of music composing as a multidimensional phenomenon that entails cognitive processes that are distributed across and beyond the physical body. Findings also suggest that composing music in collaboration with others nurtures a set of creative possibilities that would otherwise, not occur. Considerations for music education theory and practice are addressed in the last section of the article.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 259 - 276
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ALLSUP, R. E. (2011) Sequoias, mavericks, open doors. . . composing Joan Tower. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 19 (1), 24–36.Google Scholar
ANGROSINO, M. (2008) Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In Denzin, N. & Yvona, L. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 161–183). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (2003) Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 3–30). Reston: MENC.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (2011) Towards a cultural psychology of music education. In Barrett, M. (Ed.), A Cultural Psychology of Music Education (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (2014) Collaborative Creativity and Creative Collaboration: Troubling the Creative Imaginary. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
BORGO, D. (2005) Sync or Swarm: Improvising Music in a Complex Age. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, W. (2000) A somatic, ‘here and now’ semantic: Music, body and the self. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 144, 45–60.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, W. (2004) Cognition and the body: Perspectives from music education. In Bresler, L. (Ed.), Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Toward Embodied Teaching and Learning (pp. 29–50). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, W. (2009) No one true way: Music education without redemptive truth. In Regelski, T. & Gates, J. T. (Eds.), Music Education for Changing Times (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, W. & Powell, K. (2007) The body in a state of music. In Bresler, L. (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 1087–1106). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
BRUNER, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BRUNER, J. (1996) The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARR, W. (2006) Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40 (4), 421–435.Google Scholar
CRAFT, A., CREMIN, T., BURNARD, P., DRAGOVIC, T. & CHAPPBELL, K. (2013) Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? Education, 41 (5), 538–556.Google Scholar
DENZIN, N. K. (2001) Interpretive Interactionism. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, J. (2004) The struggle to redefine the relationship between ‘knowledge’ and ‘action’ in the academy: some reflections on action research. Educar, 34, 11–26.Google Scholar
FAULKNER, R. (2003) Group composing: pupil perceptions from a social psychological study. Music Education Research, 5 (2), 101–124.Google Scholar
FINNEGAN, R. (2003) Music, experience and the anthropology of emotion. In Clayton, M., Herbert, T., & Middleton, R. (Eds.), The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction (pp. 181–192). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
FLICK, U. (2002) An Introduction to Qualitative Research (2nd edn.) London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
FLICK, U. (2014) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
GLAVEANU, V. P. (2011) How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory & Psychology, 21 (4), 473–492.Google Scholar
GROMKO, J. (2003) Children composing: Inviting the artful narrative. In Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 69–90). Reston: MENC.Google Scholar
HARGREAVES, D., MacDONALD, R. & MIELL, D. (2012) Explaining musical imaginations: Creativity, performance, and perception. In Hargreaves, D., Miell, D. & MacDonald, R. (Eds.), Musical Imaginations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity, Performance and Perception (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, M. (2007) The Meaning of the Body. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.Google Scholar
JOHN–STEINER, V. (2000) Creative Collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KAUFMAN, J. C. & BEGHETTO, R. A. (2009) Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
KRUEGER, J. (2009) Enacting Musical Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16 (1), 98–123.Google Scholar
LAVE, J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LEHMANN, A. C., SLOBODA, J. A. & WOODY, R. H. (2007) Psychology for Musicians: Understanding and Acquiring the Skills. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LITTLETON, K. & MERCER, N. (2012) Communication, collaboration and creativity: how musicians negotiate a collective ‘sound’. In Hargreaves, D., Miell, D., & MacDonald, R. (Eds.), Musical Imaginations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity, Performance and Perception (pp. 233–241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LOVELESS, A. (2007) Creativity, Technology and Learning: A Review of Recent Literature (Report 4 update). Bristol: NESTA Futurelab.Google Scholar
MacDONALD, R., BYRNE, C. & CARLTON, L. (2006) Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34 (3), 292–306.Google Scholar
MacDONALD, R., MIELL, D. & MORGAN, L. (2000) Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15 (4), 405–415.Google Scholar
MacDONALD, R., WILSON, G. & MIELL, D. (2012) Improvisation as a creative process within contemporary music. In Hargreaves, D., Miell, D., & MacDonald, R. (Eds.), Musical Imaginations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity, Performance and Perception (pp. 242–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MIELL, D., LITTLETON, K. (2004) Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
MIELL, D., LITTLETON, K. & ROJAS–DRUMMOND, S. (2008) Editorial introduction. International Journal of Educational Research, 47 (1), 1–2.Google Scholar
MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO (2007) Educação e Formação em Portugal. Retrieved from http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/97/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=147&fileName=educacao_formacao_portugal.pdf Google Scholar
SALDANA, J. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
SALOMON, G. (1997) Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SAWYER, K. (2003) Group Creativity: Music, Theatre, Collaboration. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
SAWYER, R. K. (2006) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAWYER, K. (2012) Extending sociocultural theory to group creativity. Vocations and Learning, 5 (1), 59–75.Google Scholar
SAWYER, K. & DEZUTTER, S. (2009) Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3 (2), 81–92.Google Scholar
SCHIAVIO, A. & CUMMINS, F. (2015) An inter (en) active approach to musical agency and learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Multimodal Experience of Music.Google Scholar
SCHIAVIO, A. & HØFFDING, S. (2015) Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19 (4), 366–388.Google Scholar
SLOBODA, J. (2005) Exploring the Musical Mind: Cognition, Emotion, Ability, Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
STEWART, J., GAPENNE, O. & DI PAOLO, E. (2010) Introduction. In Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. vii–xvii). Massachusetts: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TALBURT, S. (2004) Ethnographic responsibility without the ‘real’. The Journal of Higher Education, 75 (1), 80–103.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E. (2005) Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 407–427.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E. (2007) Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
VARELA, F. J., THOMPSON, E. & ROSCH, E. (1993) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
VELOSO, A. L. & CARVALHO, S. (2012) Music composition as a way of learning: emotions and the situated self. In Odena, O. (Ed.), Musical Creativity: Insights from Music Education Research: Insights from Music Education Research. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
VELOSO, A. L. (2012) Voar Até ao Comboio dos Segredos: A Construção de Significados Partilhados no Desenvolvimento do Pensamento Musical em Crianças do 1° Ciclo do ΕΒ. (Doctoral thesis).Google Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ZBIKOWSKI, L. M. (2002) Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar