Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T07:13:17.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamical models and van Gelder's dynamicism: Two different things

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1998

Chris Eliasmith
Chris Eliasmith
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 chris@twinearth.wustl.edu www.artsci.wustl.edu/~celiasmi/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Van Gelder has presented a position that he ties closely to a broad class of models known as dynamical models. One can support many of his broader claims about the importance of this class (as has been argued by connectionists for quite some time), but there are a number of unique characteristics of his brand of dynamicism. These characteristics engender difficulties for his view.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , October 1998 , pp. 639
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable