Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T05:53:37.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-evaluating the Anthropocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2016

Simon Dalby
Simon Dalby*
Affiliation:
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Wilfrid Laurier University, 67 Erb Street Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2, Canada (Email: sdalby@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps the most obvious point about the Anthropocene debate is the one that gets lost most frequently, precisely because it is the most obvious. Paul Crutzen's now famous outburst in 2000 (see Crutzen & Stoermer 2000) stating that we do not live in the Holocene anymore was made in part because he was grappling with the question of the enormity of the anthropogenic transformations of the Earth system. It matters that he formulated the term to indicate the scale of transformation in geological language.

Information

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 90 , Issue 350 , April 2016 , pp. 514 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Crutzen, P. & Stoermer, E.. 2000. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.Google Scholar