Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:29:18.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic variation and effects of candidate-gene polymorphisms on coagulation properties, curd firmness modeling and acidity in milk from Brown Swiss cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

A. Cecchinato ,
S. Chessa ,
C. Ribeca ,
C. Cipolat-Gotet ,
T. Bobbo ,
J. Casellas  and
G. Bittante
A. Cecchinato*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
S. Chessa
Affiliation:
Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), via Einstein, 26900 Lodi, Italy
C. Ribeca
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
C. Cipolat-Gotet
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
T. Bobbo
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
J. Casellas
Affiliation:
Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
G. Bittante
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
*
† E-mail: alessio.cecchinato@unipd.it
Get access

Abstract

The aims of this study were to estimate the genetic variation of traditional milk coagulation properties (MCPs), milk acidity, curd firmness (CF) modeled on time t (CFt ; comprising: RCTeq, rennet coagulation time estimated from the equation; CFP , the asymptotic potential curd firmness; kCF, the curd firming instant rate constant; and kSR, the syneresis instant rate constant) and maximum CF traits (MCF; comprising CFmax, the maximum CF value; and tmax, the time of attainment). Furthermore, we investigated 96 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 54 candidate genes, testing their associations with the above-listed traits. Milk and blood samples were collected from 1271 cows (each sampled once) from 85 herds. Genotyping was performed using a custom Illumina VeraCode GoldenGate approach. A Bayesian linear animal model (including the effects of herd, days in milk, parity and additive polygenic effects) was used to estimate the genetic parameters of the studied traits. The same model with the addition of the SNP genotype effect was used for our association analysis. The heritability estimates of CFt and the MCF traits (RCTeq=0.258; kCF=0.230; CFmax=0.191; tmax=0.278) were similar to those obtained using traditional MCPs (0.187 to 0.267), except for the lower estimates for CFP (0.064) and kSR (0.077). A total of 13 of the 51 tested SNPs had relevant additive effects on at least one trait. We observed associations between MCPs and SNPs in the genes encoding ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2), chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), growth hormone 1 (GH1), prolactin (PRL) and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Whereas, CFt and the MCF traits were associated with polymorphisms in the α-s1-casein (CSN1S1), β-casein (CSN2), GH1, oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (OLR1), phospholipase C β1 (PLCB1), PRL and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A (STAT5A) genes.

Keywords

milk coagulation propertiesmilk acidityheritabilitycandidate genedairy cow

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , July 2015 , pp. 1104 - 1112
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Annibaldi, S, Ferri, F and Morra, R 1977. Nuovi orientamenti nella valutazione tecnica del latte: Tipizzazione lattodinamografica. Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero Casearia 28, 115–126.Google Scholar
Bionaz, M and Loor, JJ 2008. ACSL1, AGPAT6, FABP3, LPIN1, and SLC27A6 are the most abundant isoforms in bovine mammary tissue and their expression is affected by stage of lactation. Journal of Nutrition 138, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittante, G, Penasa, M and Cecchinato, A 2012. Invited review: genetics and modeling of milk coagulation properties. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6843–6870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittante, G, Contiero, B and Cecchinato, A 2013. Prolonged observation and modelling of milk coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis. International Dairy Journal 29, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfatti, V, Cecchinato, A, Gallo, L, Blasco, A and Carnier, P 2011. Genetic analysis of detailed milk protein composition and coagulation properties in Simmental cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 5183–5193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caroli, AM, Chessa, S and Erhardt, GJ 2009. Invited review: milk protein polymorphism in cattle: effect on animal breeding and human nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5335–5352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecchinato, A, Penasa, M, De Marchi, M, Gallo, L, Bittante, G and Carnier, P 2011. Genetic parameters of coagulation properties, milk yield, quality, and acidity estimated using coagulating and noncoagulating milk information in Brown Swiss and Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4205–4213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecchinato, A, Cipolat-Gotet, C, Casellas, J, Penasa, M, Rossoni, A and Bittante, G 2013. Genetic analysis of rennet coagulation time, curd-firming rate, and curd firmness assessed on an extended testing period using mechanical and near-infrared instruments. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecchinato, A, Ribeca, C, Chessa, S, Cipolat-Gotet, C, Maretto, F, Casellas, J and Bittante, G 2014. Candidate gene association analysis for milk yield, composition, urea nitrogen and somatic cell scores in Brown Swiss cows. Animal 8, 1062–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chessa, S, Bulgari, O, Rossoni, A, Ceriotti, G and Caroli, AM 2013. Bovine β-casein: detection of two single nucleotide polymorphisms by bidirectional allele specific polymerase chain reaction BAS-PCR and monitoring of their variation. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 31, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolat-Gotet, C, Cecchinato, A, De Marchi, M, Penasa, M and Bittante, G 2012. Comparison between mechanical and near-infrared methods for assessing coagulation properties of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6806–6819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, DS and Mackay, TFC 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition Longman, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Fleminger, G, Heftsi, R, Uzi, M, Nissim, S and Gabriel, L 2011. Chemical and structural characterization of bacterially-derived casein peptides that impair milk clotting. International Dairy Journal 21, 914–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geweke, J 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments (with discussion). In Bayesian statistics (ed. JO Berger, JM Bernardo, AP Dawid and AFM Smith), pp. 164–193. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Geyer, CJ 1992. Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science 7, 473–483.Google Scholar
Gouilleux, F, Wakao, H, Mundt, M and Groner, B 1994. Prolactin induces phosphorylation of Tyr694 of Stat5 (MGF), a prerequisite for DNA binding and induction of transcription. EMBO Journal 13, 4361–4369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heck, JML, Schennink, A, van Valenberg, HJF, Bovenhuis, H, MHPW, Visker, van Arendonk, JAM and van Hooijdonk, ACM 2009. Effects of milk protein variants on the protein composition of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1192–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonen, T, Morri, S, Tyrisevä, AM, Ruottinen, O and Ojala, M 2004. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between milk coagulation properties, milk production traits, somatic cell count, casein content, and pH of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation 2013. The world dairy situation (Bulletin 470/2013. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Khatib, H, Rosa, GJM, Weigel, K, Schiavini, F, Santus, E and Bagnato, A 2007. Additional support for an association between OLR1 and milk fat traits in cattle. Animal Genetics 38, 308–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khatib, H, Monson, RL, Schutzkus, V, Kohl, DM, Rosa, GJ and Rutledge, JJ 2008. Mutations in the STAT5A gene are associated with embryonic survival and milk composition in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 784–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Krifucks, O, Merin, U, Lavi, Y and Silanikove, N 2006. Interactions between bacteria type, proteolysis of casein and physicochemical properties of bovine milk. International Dairy Journal 16, 648–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunden, A, Nilsson, M and Janson, L 1997. Marked effect of β-lactoglobulin polymorphism on the ratio of casein to total protein in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2996–3005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishimura, T 2003. Expression of potential lymphocyte trafficking mediator molecules in the mammary gland. Veterinary Research 34, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okigbo, LM, Richardson, GH, Brown, RJ and Ernstrom, CA 1985. Variation in coagulation properties of milk from individual cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 822–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paukku, K and Silvennoinen, O 2004. STATs as critical mediators of signal transduction and transcription: lessons learned from STAT5. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 15, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinzenberg, EM, Weimann, C, Brandt, H, Bennewitz, J, Kalm, E, Schwerin, M and Erhardt, G 2003. Polymorphism of the bovine CSN1S1 promoter: linkage mapping, intragenic haplotypes, and effect on milk production traits. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2696–2705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raftery, AE and Lewis, SM 1992. How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler?. In Bayesian Statistics (ed. JM Bernardo, JO Berger, AP Dawid and AFM Smith), pp. 763–774. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Ramírez, O, Quintanilla, R, Varona, L, Gallardo, D, Diaz, I, Pena, RN and Amills, M 2013. DECR1 and ME1 genotypes are associated with lipid composition traits in Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedholm, A, Larsen, LB, Lindmark Mansson, H, Karlsson, AH and Andren, A 2006. Effect of protein composition on the cheesemaking properties of milk from individual dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3296–3305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, J, Geale, PF, Sheehy, PA and Williamson, P 2012. The impact of ABCG2 on bovine mammary epithelial cell proliferation. Animal Biotechnology 23, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed