Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:21:56.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the efficacy of flunixin meglumine and meloxicam for lame sows using nociceptive threshold tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MD Pairis-Garcia ,
AK Johnson ,
KJ Stalder ,
LA Karriker ,
JF Coetzee  and
ST Millman
MD Pairis-Garcia
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
AK Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
KJ Stalder
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
LA Karriker
Affiliation:
Swine Medicine Education Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
JF Coetzee
Affiliation:
Pharmacology Analytical Support Service, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
ST Millman
Affiliation:
Departments of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine and Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: johnsona@iastate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lameness in breeding swine can cause severe pain leading to on-farm welfare issues and significant economic impacts. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including meloxicam and flunixin meglumine are commonly used in veterinary medicine for their analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. Pressure algometry and thermal sensitivity tests are non-invasive methods to quantify pain sensitivity using nociceptive thresholds to provoke withdrawal responses on lame and sound legs. The objective of this work was to determine the effects of these drugs on nociceptive thresholds in sows induced lame using pressure algometry and thermal sensitivity tests. Lameness was induced in 24 mature, mixed-parity sows using a chemical synovitis model and three treatments were compared: meloxicam (1.0 mg kg−1 PO), flunixin meglumine (2.2 mg kg−1 IM) and sterile saline (IM). Pressure algometry was measured on sound and lame rear legs with three replicates at three landmarks. Thermal sensitivity tests were done on sound and lame rear legs with three replicates using a thermal stimulus at one landmark. From 37 to 72 h after lameness induction, meloxicam- and flunixin meglumine-treated sows tolerated higher pressure algometer nociceptive thresholds compared to saline-treated sows. Changes in thermal nociceptive thresholds were evident at the Tmax time-points for meloxicam administration and 72 and 168 h post lameness induction for flunixin meglumine-treated sows. In conclusion, flunixin meglumine and meloxicam administration mitigated pain sensitivity in lame sows post lameness induction when pain sensitivity was evaluated with pressure algometry. These analgesic drugs may be a key tool to manage pain associated with lameness.

Keywords

animal welfareflunixin megluminelamenessmeloxicamnociceptive thresholdswine

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 219 - 229
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chase, CCL, Daniels, CS, Garcia, R, Milward, F and Nation, T 2008 Needle-free injection technology in swine: progress toward vaccine efficacy and pork quality. Journal of Swine Health and Production 16: 254–261Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF 2011 A review of pain assessment techniques and pharmacological approaches to pain relief after bovine castration: practical implications for cattle production within the United States. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 192–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.016Google Scholar
Crombez, G, Eccleston, C, Baeyens, F, Van HoudenHove, B and Van Den Broeck, A 1999a Attention to chronic pain is dependent upon pain-related fear. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 47: 403–410Google Scholar
Crombez, G, Vlaeye, JW, Heuts, PH and Lysens, R 1999b Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 80: 329–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00229-2Google Scholar
Currah, JM, Hendrick, JM and Stookey, JM 2009 The behavioral assessment and alleviation of pain associated with castration in beef calves treated with flunixin meglumine and caudal lidocaine epidural anesthesia with epinephrine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 50: 375–382Google ScholarPubMed
Di Giminiani, P, Peterson, LJ and Herskin, MS 2012 Nociceptive responses to thermal and mechanical stimulation in awake pigs. European Journal of Pain 17: 638–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j. 1532-2149.2012.00228.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyer, RM, Neerchal, NK, Tasch, U, Wu, Y, Dyer, P and Rajkondawar, PG 2007 Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 4592–4602. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0006Google ScholarPubMed
Elmore, M, Garner, J, Johnson, A, Richert, B and Pajor, E 2010 A flooring comparison: the impact of rubber mats on the health, behavior, and welfare of group-housed sows at breeding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123: 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.012Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, CE, Chapinal, N, Petersson-Wolfe, CS, DeVries, TJ, Kelton, DF, Duffield, TF and Leslie, KE 2013 The effect of meloxicam on pain sensitivity, rumination time, and clinical signs in dairy cows with endotoxin-induced clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 2847–2856. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5855Google ScholarPubMed
Friton, GM, Philipp, H, Schneider, T and Kleeman, R 2003 Investigation on the clinical efficacy and safety of meloxicam (Metacam®) in the treatment of non-infectious locomotor disorders in pigs. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 116: 421–426Google Scholar
Gaynor, J and Muir, W 2009 Handbook of Veterinary Pain Management. Mosby: St Louis, USGoogle Scholar
Hastings, M 2010 Body clocks: the control of circadian rhythms of behaviour and physiology. Animal Technology and Welfare 9: 69–75Google Scholar
Haussler, K, Hill, A, Frisbie, D and McIlwrait, CW 2007 Determination and use of mechanical nociceptive thresholds of the thoracic limb to assess pain associated with induced osteoarthritis of the middle carpal joint in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 68: 1167–1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.11.1167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrich, A, Duffield, TF, Lissemore, KD and Millman, ST 2010 The effect of meloxicam on behavior and pain sensitivity of dairy calves following cautery dehorning with a local anaesthetic. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 2450–2457. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskin, MS, Ladewig, J and Arendt-Nielsen, L 2009 Measuring cutaneous thermal nociception in group-housed pigs using laser technique-effects of laser power output. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 144–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2009.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskin, MS, Muller, R, Schrader, L and Ladewig, J 2003 A laser-based method to measure thermal nociception in dairy cows: short-term repeatability and effects of power output and skin condition. Journal of Animal Science 81: 945–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higginson-Cutler, JH, Cramer, G, Walter, JJ, Millman ST Kelton, DF 2013 Randomized clinical trial of oxytetracycline hydrochloride bandage and paste treatments for resolution of lesions and pain associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 96(12): 7550–7557. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6384Google Scholar
Hothersall, B, Caplen, G, Nicol, CJ, Taylor, PM, Waterman-Pearson, AE, Weeks, CA and Murrell, JC 2011 Development of mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold testing devices in unrestrained birds (broiler chickens). Journal of Neuroscience Methods 201: 220–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.Jneu meth.2011.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J, Arnholdt, T, Mostl, E, Gelfert, CC and Drillich, M 2013 Pain management with flunixin meglumine at dehorning of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 132–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5483Google ScholarPubMed
IASP 2004 Pain terms, a current list with definitions and notes on usage. In: Merskey, H and Bogduk, N (eds) Classification of Chronic Pain pp 209–214. IASP Press: Seattle, USAGoogle Scholar
Intervet Schering Plough 2013 http://sploughus.naccvp.com/index.php?u=country&p=msds&prodnum=104725 I &id=1047251&m=product_basic_viewGoogle Scholar
Janczak, AM, Ranheim, B, Fosse, TK, Hild, S, Nordgreen, J, Moe, RO and Zanella, AJ 2012 Factors affecting mechanical (nociceptive) thresholds in piglets. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 39: 628–635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00737.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, S, McLean, KA, Chrinside, J, Deans, LA, Calvert, SK, Molony, V and Lawrence, AB 1997 Opioid-medicated changes in nociceptive threshold during pregnancy and parturition in the sow. Pain 72: 153–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00027-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, T, Kristensen, H and Toft, N 2012 Quantifying the impact of lameness on welfare and profitability of finisher pigs using expert opinions. Livestock Science 149: 209–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karriker, LA, Abell, CE, Pairis-Garcia, MD, Holt, WA, Sun, S, Coetzee, JF, Johnson, AK, Hoff, SJ and Stalder, KJ 2013 Validation of a lameness model in sows using physiological and mechanical measurements. Journal of Animal Science 91: 130–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4994CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluviers-Poodt, M, Zonderland, JJ, Verbraak, J, Lambooij, E and Hellebrekers, LJ 2013 Pain behaviour after castration of piglets; effect of pain relief with lidocaine and/or meloxicam. Animal 7: 1158–1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000086Google Scholar
Kotschwar, JL, Coetzee, JF, Anderson, DE, Hegring, R, KuKanich, B and Apley, MD 2009 Analgesic efficacy of sodium salicylate in an amphotericin B-induced bovine synovitis-arthritis model. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 3731–3743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, SJ, Livingston, A and Waterman, AE 1989 The effect of chronic clinical pain on thermal and mechanical thresholds in sheep. Pain 39: 353–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90049-3Google ScholarPubMed
Livingston, A 2006 Physiological basis of pain management. In: Doherty, T and Valverde, A (eds) Manual of Equine Anaesthesia and Analgesia pp 293–305. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Magyan, T and Glavits, R 2007 Clinical comparison of tissue tolerance of meloxicam 20 mg injectable and flunixin injectable in pigs. Pig Journal 59: 112–124Google Scholar
Matthew, K 2000 Pain assessment and general approach to management. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 30: 729–752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(08)70004-4Google Scholar
Nalon, E, Maes, D, Piepers, S, van Riet, MMJ, Janssens, GPJ, Millet, S and Tuyttens, FAM 2013 Mechanical nociception thresholds in lame sows: evidence of hyperalgesia as measured by two different methods. The Veterinary Journal 198: 386–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.08.016Google ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (Subcommittee on Swine Nutrition; Committee on Animal Nutrition) 2012 Nutrient Requirements of Swine. The National Academic Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Nolan, AM, Livingston, A, Morris, R and Waterman, AE 1987 Techniques for comparison of thermal and mechanical nociceptive stimuli in the sheep. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 17: 39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-5402(87)90035-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pairis-Garcia, MD, Karriker, LA, Johnson, AK, KuKanich, B, Wulf, L, Sander, S, Millman, ST, Stalder, KJ and Coetzee, JF 2013 Pharmacokinetics of flunixin meglumine in mature swine after intravenous, intramuscular and oral administration. BMC Veterinary Research 9: 165Google ScholarPubMed
Reiner, G, Schollasch, F, Hillen, S, Willems, H, Piechotta, M and Failing, K 2012 Effects of meloxicam and flunixin on pain, stress and discomfort in male piglets during and after surgical castration. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 125: 305–314Google ScholarPubMed
Sandercock, DA, Gibson, IF, Brash, HM, Rutherford, KMD, Scott, EM and Nolan, AM 2009 Development of a mechanical stimulator and force measurement system for the assessment of nociceptive thresholds in pigs. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 182: 64–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.05.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc 2011 Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Schenk, E, Marchant-Forde, J and Lay, D 2010 Sow lameness and longevity. USDA-ARS-MWA Livestock Behavior Research Unit, Purdue University: West Lafayette, USAGoogle Scholar
Schulz, KL, Anderson, DE, Coetzee, JF, White, BJ and Miesner, MD 2011 Effect of flunixin meglumine on the amelioration of lameness in dairy steers with amphotericin B-induced transient synovitis-arthritis. American Journal of Veterinary Medicine 72: 1431–1438Google ScholarPubMed
Stalder, K, Lacy, R, Cross, T, Conaster, G and Darroch, C 2000 Net present value analysis of sow longevity and the economic sensitivity of net present value to changes in production, market price, feed cost, and replacement gilt cost in a farrow-to-finish operation. Professional Animal Scientist 16: 33–40Google Scholar
Stalder, K, Lacy, R, Cross, T and Conaster, G 2003 Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis. Journal of Swine Health and Production 11: 69–74Google Scholar
StubsjØen, SM, FlØ, AS, Moe, RO, Janczak, AM, Skerve, E, Valle, PS and Zanella, AJ 2009 Exploring non-invasive methods to assess pain in sheep. Physiology and Behavior 98: 640–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.09.019Google ScholarPubMed
Tapper, KR, Johnson, AK, Karriker, LA, Stalder, KJ, Parson, RL, Wang, C and Millman, ST 2013 Pressure algometry and thermal sensitivity for assessing pain sensitivity and effects of flunixin meglumine and sodium salicylate in a transient lameness model in sows. Livestock Science 157: 245–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.07.017Google Scholar
Veissier, I, Rushen, J, Colwell, D and de Passillé, AM 2000 A laser-based method for measuring thermal nociception of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 289–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00099-4Google ScholarPubMed
Welsh, EM and Nolan, AM 1995 Effect of flunixin meglumine on the thresholds to mechanical stimulation in healthy and lame sheep. Veterinary Science Research 58: 61–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(95)90090-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed