Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-7f72j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-14T03:28:21.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food Processors' Use of Contracts to Purchase Agricultural Inputs: Evidence from a Pennsylvania Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Edward C. Jaenicke ,
Martin Shields  and
Timothy W. Kelsey
Edward C. Jaenicke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at Penn State University in University Park, Pennsylvania
Martin Shields
Affiliation:
Martin Shields is in the Department of Economics at Colorado State University
Timothy W. Kelsey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at Penn State University in University Park, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data from a survey of Pennsylvania food processors, we investigate what firm-level characteristics make a processor more or less likely to buy agricultural inputs and ingredients though contracts. We find that over 20 percent of Pennsylvania processors use contracts, and over 44 percent of agricultural inputs (based on value) are purchased under contract. We also analyze the two related questions of what firm attributes, attitudes, or other factors make a firm more likely to use contracts at all, and what factors lead a processor who does contract to use them more intensively.

Keywords

contractingfood processorslogitsample selection

Information

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , October 2007 , pp. 213 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boehlje, M., and Schrader, L.F. 1998. “The Industrialization of Agriculture: Questions of Coordination.” In Royer, J.S. and Rogers, R.T., eds., The Industrialization of Agriculture: Vertical Coordination in the U.S. Food System. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Boger, S. 2001. “Quality and Contracting Choice: A Transaction Cost Approach to the Polish Hog Market.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 28(3): 241–261.Google Scholar
Glaser, L.K., Thompson, G.D., and Handy, C.R. 2001. “Recent Changes in Marketing and Trade Practices in the U.S. Lettuce and Fresh-Cut Vegetable Industries.” Agricultural Information Bulletin Number No. 767, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis (5th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B.R., and Tirole, J. 1989. “The Theory of the Firm.” In Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D., eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hueth, B., and Ligon, E. 1999. “Producer Price Risk and Quality Measurement.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(3): 512–524.Google Scholar
Hueth, B., Ligon, E., Wolf, S., and Wu, S. 1999. “Incentive Instruments in Fruit and Vegetable Contracts: Input Control, Monitoring, and Price Risk.” Review of Agricultural Economics 21(2): 374–389.Google Scholar
Hueth, B., and Melkonyan, T. 2004. “Quality Measurement and Contract Design: Evidence from the North American Sugar Beet Industry.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(2): 165–181.Google Scholar
Katz, M.L. 1989. “Vertical Contractual Relations.” In Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D., eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Knoeber, C.R., and Thurman, W.N. 1995. “‘Don't Count Your Chickens …’: Risk and Risk Shifting in the Broiler Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(3): 486–496.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.D., Schroeder, T.C., and Hayenga, M.L. 2001. “Evolving Producer-Packer-Customer Linkages in the Beef and Pork Industries.” Review of Agricultural Economics 23(2): 370–385.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J., and Korb, P. 2006. “Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2003.” Economic Information Bulletin No. 9, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
MacDonald, J., Perry, J., Ahearn, M., Banker, D., Chambers, W., Dimitri, C., Key, N., Nelson, K., and Southard, L. 2004. “Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 837, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Martin, L.L. 1997. “Production Contracts, Risk Shifting, and Relative Performance Payments in the Pork Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(2): 267–278.Google Scholar
Martinez, S.W. 1999. “Vertical Coordination in the Pork and Broiler Industries: Implications for Pork and Chicken Products.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 777, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Mighell, R.L., and Jones, L.A. 1963. “Vertical Coordination in Agriculture.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 19, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. “2002 Economic Census, Manufacturing Subject Series.” Publication No. EC02-31SG-1, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1989. “Transaction Cost Economics.” In Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D., eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar