Element contents
The Imagination Pulse
From Flickers to Firestorms in Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 August 2025
Summary
This Element explores the transformative power of reading as a deeply imaginative, embodied process. It challenges conventional views of reading as mere decoding and argues that reading involves a dynamic interplay between perception, imagination, and the body. Drawing from ecological-embodied theories and cross-disciplinary insights, it introduces the concept of 'breaks' in reading – moments of pause, disruption, and reflection – as essential to fostering rich imaginative engagement. By focusing on multiscalar attention, pacemaking, and material engagement, the Element proposes a novel framework for understanding reading as an active, creative process that enhances cognitive and emotional depth. Through a cognitive ethnography of reading, the Element demonstrates how these imaginative breaks can cultivate more meaningful and sustained interactions with texts, offering insights for education and reading practices. Ultimately, the Element seeks to reimagine the role of reading in enhancing imaginative capacities and navigating today's complex social and global challenges.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009528450Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 September 2025
References
Anderson, M. L. (2014). After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Andrade, J. (2010). What does doodling do? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24: 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asma, S. T. (2017). The Evolution of Imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggs, E. (2021). All affordances are social: Foundations of a Gibsonian social ontology. Ecological Psychology, 33(3–4): 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2000). Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53: 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D. (1974). Displacement activities in a dental office. Psychological Reports, 34: 947–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2021). How We Read Now: Strategic Choices for Print, Screen, and Audio. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S., & Mangen, A. (2021). The decline of long long-form reading in higher education. Poetics Today, 42(2): 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benne, C. (2021). Tolle lege. Embodied reading and the ‘scene of reading’. Language Sciences, 84: 101357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruineberg, J., & van den Herik, J. C. (2021). Embodying mental affordances. Inquiry, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1987316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, R. L. (2010). The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annual Review of Psychology, 61: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124: 1–38.Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2006). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cave, T. (2022). Live Artefacts: Literature in a Cognitive Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 8719–8724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: A dynamic framework. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17: 718–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobley, P., & Siebers, J. (2021). Close reading and distance: Between invariance and a rhetoric of embodiment. Language Sciences, 84: 101359.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. J. (2011). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, S. J. (2021). Reading: Skilled linguistic action. Language Sciences, 84: 101364.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity between Life and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, J., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention and lecture retention: The effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Frontiers of Psychology, 4: 619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1): 147–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3): 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A., Gleiser, M., & Thompson, E. (2024). The Blind Spot: Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, R. (2023). Epistemic cultural constraints on the uses of psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 68: 100986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2018). Building a stronger concept of embodiment. In Newen, A., Bruin, L. De, & Gallagher, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (pp. 368–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2017). Embodied dynamics in literary experience. In Burke, M., & Troscianko, E. T. (eds.), Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition (pp. 219–237). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 15: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5): 701–721.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., & Brock, T. C. (eds.), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 315–341). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 27: 14365–14374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2009). The construction system of the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 364: 1263–1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heft, H. (1996). The ecological approach to navigation: A Gibsonian perspective. In Portugali, J. (ed.), The Construction of Cognitive Maps. GeoJournal Library, vol. 32 (pp. 105–132). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Heft, H. (2020). Ecological psychology as social psychology? Theory and Psychology, 30(6): 813–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(3): 263–294.Google Scholar
Høffding, S. (2018). A Phenomenology of Musical Absorption. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2013). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.830548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2021). An Interview with Tim Ingold. www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaZy0NWQoKo. Accessed 30 September 2024.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2022). Imagining for Real: Essays on Creation, Attention and Correspondence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2024). On Being Tasked with the Problem of Inhabiting the page. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 13(2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, T. W., & Pedersen, S. B. (2016). Affect and affordances: The role of action and emotion in social interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 9(1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. (2023). ‘Min kuglepen er en sporhund, når jeg læser’: Et kognitivt etnografisk studie af læseprocesser. [‘My pen is a tracking dog when I read’: A cognitive ethnographic study of reading processes]. University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Kieverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2020). Skill-based engagement with a rich landscape of affordances as an alternative to thinking through other minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), 43:e106. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1900284X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2018). Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: An ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, 26(5):147–163. doi: 10.1177/1059712318772778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kono, Tetsuya. 2022. A Meteorological or Oceanographic Approach to the Self: An Interpretation of the ‘Gap’ of Zeami. www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBFbaqFTYxg. Accessed 30 September 2024.Google Scholar
Kristensen, D.-T., Kukkonen, K., Eriksen, S., & Trasmundi, S. B. (2024). Voices in reading literature. Language Sciences, 106: 101664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. (2020). Probability Designs: Literature and Predictive Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyselo, M. (2018). The body social: An enactive approach to the self. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(986): 1–16.Google Scholar
Kyselo, M (2023). What self in self-organization? Engaging Varela’s epistemology for the co-embodied self. Journal of Consciousness Studies 30(11): 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. S. Elden, & G. Moore (trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Levine, J. A., Schleusner, S. J., & Jensen, M. D. (2000). Energy expenditure of nonexercise activity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72: 1451–1454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar
Macrine, S. L., & Fugate, J. M. (2022). Movement Matters: How Embodied Cognition Informs Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Advances in Haptics, 1(3): 86–104.Google Scholar
Mangen, A. (2016). What hands may tell us about reading and writing. Educational Theory, 66(4): 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (2019). Comparing Comprehension of a long text read in print book and on kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Schilhab, T. (2012). An embodied view of reading: Theoretical considerations, empirical findings and educational implications. In Matre, S., & Skaftun, A. (eds.), Skriv! Les!(pp. 285–300). Trondheim: Akademika forlag.Google Scholar
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., et al. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315: 393–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, T. (2020). Self-representational theories of consciousness. In Kriegel, U. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness (pp. 1–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9: 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohiyeddini, C., Bauer, S., & Semple, S. (2013). Displacement behaviour is associated with reduced stress levels among men but not women. PLoS ONE, 8: e56355. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohiyeddini, C., & Semple, S. (2013). Displacement behaviour regulates the experience of stress in men. Stress, 16: 163–171.Google ScholarPubMed
Morioka, M. (2015). How to create MA – the living pause– in the landscape of the mind: The wisdom of Noh theatre. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 9(1): 81–95.Google Scholar
Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popova, Y., & Cuffari, E. C. (2018). Temporality of sense-making in narrative interactions. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1): 20180007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravn, S. (2017). Dancing practices: Seeing and sensing the moving body. Body & Society, 23(2): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, E. (2022). The affordances of art for making technologies. Adaptive Behavior, 30(6): 489–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, H. (2020). The Uncontrollability of the World. J. C. Wagner (trans.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9): 657–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4): 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Cognitive probatonics: Towards an ecological psychology of cognitive particulars. New Ideas in Psychology, 42: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, S. V., Döring, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2024). Ecolinguistics: Living and languaging. In Steffensen, S. V., Döring, M., & Cowley, S. (eds.), Language as an Ecological Phenomenon: Languaging and Bioecologies in Human-Environment Relationships (1–26). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5): 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, J., & Trasmundi, S. B. (2024). The aesthetic dimension of reading: An embodied-ecological approach. Ecological Psychology, 36(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasmundi, S. (2020). Errors in Interaction: A Cognitive Ethnography of Emergency Medicine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B. (2024). Becoming a reader: Dwelling within the page. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 13(3): 20–32.Google Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B. (2025). Reading as open-ended engagement. In Bausch, B. (ed.), Reading Reading (pp. 1–8). Hamburg: Textam Verlag.Google Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B., Baggs, E., Toro, J., & Steffensen, S. V. (2024). Expertise in non-well-defined task domains: The case of reading. Social Epistemology, 38(1): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B., & Cowley, S. J. (2020). How readers beget imagining. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 531682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trasmundi, S. B., Kokkola, L., Schilhab, T., & Mangen, A. (2021). A distributed perspective on reading: Implications for education. Language Sciences, 84: 101367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B., & Kukkonen, K. (2024). Aisthessis, aesthetics and cognition: Embodiments in reading. Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, 47(3): 103–119.Google Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(29): 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasmundi, S. B., & Toro, J. (2023). Mind wandering in reading: An embodied approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17: 1061437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trasmundi, S. B., Toro, J., & Mangen, A. (2022). Human pacemakers and experiential reading. Frontiers in Communication, 7: 897043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2020). Situated imagination. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 24:455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09701-2.Google ScholarPubMed
Walsh, D. M. (2015). Organisms, Agency and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wig, S., Trasmundi, S. B., Hakemulder, F., Holm-Torjusen, F., & Mangen, A. (2025). Flow and longform reading. Notes from an exploratory case study. Cognitive Semiotics, 18(1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Wolters, A., Kim, Y. G., & Szura, J. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3): 136–143.Google Scholar
Zermiani, F. M., Dhar, P., Sood, E., et al. (2024). InteRead: An eye tracking dataset of interrupted reading. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (pp. 9154–9169). Torino, Italia. ELRA and ICCL.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
The PDF of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.