Element contents
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
God and Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2025
Summary
This Element brings work from the philosophy of technology into conversation with media, religion, culture studies, and work in digital religion studies to explore examples of how popular media and emerging technologies are increasingly framed and understood through a distinct range of spiritual myths, metaphors, images, and representations of God. Working with three case studies about how internet memes, popular films, and media coverage of public philosophy link ideas about God and technology, this Element draws attention to common conceptions that describe a perceived relationship between religion and technology today. It synthesizes these discussions and categories and presents them in four distinct models, showing a range of ways in which the relationship between God and technology is commonly depicted. The Element seeks to create a platform for scholarly study and critical discourse on technology's religious and spiritual representation in digital and emerging media cultures and contexts through this work.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in the Problems of GodOnline ISBN: 9781009287104Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 21 August 2025
References
Aguilar, Gabrielle, Campbell, Heidi, Stanley, Mariah, & Taylor, Ellen (2017). Communication mixed messages about religion through internet memes. Information, Communication & Society, 20(10), 1458–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albanese, Catherine L. (1999). America: Religions and Religion (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Al-Sibai, Noor (2023a). Machine Learning Investor Warns AI is Becoming Like a God. Futurism. https://futurism.com/ai-investor-agi-warning.Google Scholar
Al-Sibai, Noor (2023b). Nick Bostrom Says AI Chatbots May Have Some Degree of Sentience. The Byte. https://futurism.com/the-byte/nick-bostrom-ai-chatbot-sentience.Google Scholar
Ammerman, Nancy T. (2006). Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305418.001.0001.Google Scholar
Aristotle (2009). Nicomachean Ethics, Translated by D. Ross. Oxford University Press. (Original work 4th century BCE).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Karen (1993). A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York City: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Aydin, Ciano & Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2015). Transcendence in Technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2015121742.Google Scholar
Bailey, Edward (1997). Implicit Religion in Contemporary Society. Kampen, Netherlands: Kok Pharos Publishing House.Google Scholar
Bao, Jiemen (2005). Merit-making capitalism: Re-territorializing Thai Buddhism in Silicon Valley, California. Journal of Asian American Studies, 8(2), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerman, Judy (2023). Damon Lindelof’s Mrs. Davis Is a Wild Allegory of Faith in the Age of AI, Time Online. https://time.com/6271958/mrs-davis-review/.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. (1970). Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditional World. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bellar, Wendi, Campbell, Heidi, Cho, James, Kyong, Terry, Andrea, Tsuria, Ruth, Yadlin-Segal, Aya, & Ziemer, Jordan (2013). Reading religion in internet memes. Journal of Religion, Media & Digital Culture. http://jrmdc.com/papers/2-2-bellar/.Google Scholar
Beniger, James (2009). The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1936). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. New York City: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Besecke, Kelly (2001). Speaking of meaning in modernity: Reflexive spirituality as a cultural resource. Sociology of Religion, 62(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolter, Jay (2016). Posthumanism. In Craig, Robert T., Rothenbuhler, Eric W., Jensen, Klaus Bruhn, & Pooley, Jefferson D., eds., The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons, 1–8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect220.Google Scholar
Borgman, Albert (2003). Holding onto Reality: The Nature of Information at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borgmann, Albert (2003). Power Failure: Christianity in the Culture of Technology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.Google Scholar
Bostron, Nick (2003). The Transhumanist FAQ. https://nickbostrom.com/views/transhumanist.pdf.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press. www.google.de/books/edition/Superintelligence/7_H8AwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Nick+Bostrom&printsec=frontcover.Google Scholar
Boynton, Andrew, & Milazzo, G. Tom (1996). Post-Fordist debate: A theoretical perspective to information technology and the firm. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 6(3), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Robert (1973). Alexander Graham Bell and the Conquest of Solitude. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, Gary R. (2009). iMuslims: Rewiring the House of Islam. New York City: The Other Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi (2009). Posthumanism. In Campbell, Heidi & Looy, Heather, eds., The Science and Religion Primer, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic Books, 177–179.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi & LaPastina, Antonio (2010). How the iPhone became divine: Blogging, religion and intertextuality. New Media and Society, 12(7), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Heidi A. (2006). Postcyborg ethics: A new way to speak of technology. Explorations in Media Ecology, 5(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.5.4.279_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Heidi (2013). The rise of the study of digital religion. In Campbell, H. ed., Digital Religion. Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, London: Routledge, 1–22.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi (2016). Problematizing the human-technology relationship through techno-spiritual myths presented in The Machine, Transcendence and Her. Journal of Religion & Film, 20(1). https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol20/iss1/21.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi (2016b). Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass, 63(3), 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Heidi (2021). How church online during the COVID-19 pandemic created space for a posthuman worldview. Concilium, 3, 43–54.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi, & Jones, Grace (2022). When the church embraced a posthuman future: How pastoral negotiations with technology during the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in an implicit acceptance of posthumanism. In Postdigital Theologies: Technology, Belief, and Practice, Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi, & Tsuria, Ruth (2021). Digital Religion, Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matt (2016). Automated journalism: A posthuman future for digital news? The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Allison (2023). “AI is your partner, not your secret”: Making use of your “digital doppelganger,” PR Daily. www.prdaily.com/ai-is-your-partner-not-your-secret-making-use-of-your-digital-doppelganger/.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Lance (2023). How Generative AI Puts the Magic Back in Hardware Design. EDN Network. www.edn.com/how-generative-ai-puts-the-magic-back-in-hardware-design/.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (1997). An introduction to the information age. City, 2(7), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819708900050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Carolyn (2022). Work Pray Code: When Work Becomes Religion in Silicon Valley. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark (2017.) New Romantic Cyborgs: Romanticism, Information, Technology, and the End of the Machine. Boston: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Margaret (1989). Walter Benjamin’s Phantasmagoria, New German Critique, 48, 87–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/488234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole‐Turner, Ron (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism, In Schweiker, William, ed., Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1098–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, Jeffery K., & Cowan, Douglas. E. (Eds.). (2000). Religion on the Internet: Research prospects and promises. New York: JAI. Sociology of Religion, 63, https://dio.org/10.2307/3712307.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (2002). Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science Theology. Lisle, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Vreese, De, Claus, H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal+ Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTommaso, Lorenzo (2011). Apocalyptic eschatology and the transcendence of death in William Gibson‘s neuromancer. The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1980).The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, www.google.de/search?hl=de&tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Elizabeth+L.+Eisenstein%22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, John. L. (2018). Islam: The Straight Path (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farisco, Michele (2013). Posthuman condition. In Esposito, John, ed., Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1702.Google Scholar
Ferrando, Francesca (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.Google Scholar
Ferrando, Francesca (2019). The posthuman divine: When robots can be enlightened. SOPHIA, 58, 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-019-00753-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, Gavin, & Martin, Charles (translators) (2013). The Bhagavad Gita: A New Translation. New York City: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Fox, Nick, & Alldred, Pam (2020). Re‐assembling climate change policy: Materialism, posthumanism, and the policy assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genovese, Andrea & Pansera, Mario (2019). The Circular Economy at a Crossroad: Technocratic Eco-Modernism or Convivial Technology for Social Revolution? https://ssrn.com/abstract=3459180 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Susan (2006). Religion and Technology in the 21st Century: Faith in the E-World. Hershey, PA: Information Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Graham, Elaine (2002). Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Elaine (2015). The final frontier? Religion and posthumanism in film and television. In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greil, Arthur L. (1993). Exploration along the sacred frontier: Notes on para-religions, quasi-religions, and other boundary phenomena. In Hadden, Jeffrey. K. & Cowan, Douglas. E. eds., The Handbook on Cults and Sects in America, Leeds, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 305–323.Google Scholar
Grieve, Greg P., & Veidlinger, Daniel. (eds.). (2014). Buddhism, the Internet, and Digital Media: The Pixel in the Lotus. New York City: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusin, Richard (eds.,) (2015). The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hales, Kathryn (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, David (1997). Lived Religion In America: Toward A History Of Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Sam (2016). Technologies of Religion: Spheres of the Sacred in a Post-secular Modernity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harvey, Peter (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History, and Practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauskeller, Michael, Philbeck, Thomas & Carbonell, Curtis (2015). Posthumanism in Film and Television. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Lovitt, W., trans., New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner (1944). Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace (1995). God’s World, God’s Body. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Eithne (2023). Letter: Humanity Surpasses AI in Creativity and Spirituality, Financial Times Opinion. www.ft.com/content/6028acf5-772d-4853-97a5-3459acbbd5bb.Google Scholar
Kingwell, Mark (2022). Singular Creatures: Robots, Rights, and the Politics of Posthumanism. Montreal, QC: McGill Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kingwell, Mark (2023). Why are we so afraid of being displaced by machines? It’s only human nature, Toronto Globe and Mail online. www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-why-are-we-so-afraid-of-being-displaced-by-machines-its-only-human/.Google Scholar
Kline, Ronald (2003). Resisting consumer technology in rural America: The telephone and electrification. Technology and Culture, 44(4), 759–790. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2003.0202.Google Scholar
Koetsier, John (2023). Ray Kurzweil On AI Pause: No, Forbes.com. www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/05/08/ray-kurzweil-on-ai-pause-no/amp/.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lee, Brant T. (2007). The devil in the details: An essay on the blind watchmaker, the invisible hand, and the theology of whiteness. Quinnipiac Law Review, 26, 7–6.Google Scholar
Levenson, John. D. (2006). The love of God: Divine gift, human gratitude, and mutual faithfulness in Judaism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Alvin (2018). Digital Spirits in Religion and Media: Possession and Performance. London: Routledge. www.routledge.com/Digital-Spirits-in-Religion-and-Media-Possession-and-Performance/Lim/p/book/9780815393320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lövheim, Mia (2013). Young people, religious identity, and the internet. In Hojsgaard, Morten & Warburg, Margit, eds., Religion Online. London, UK: Routledge, 59–74.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas (1967). The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York City: New York University.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald (1984). Marx and the machine. Technology and culture, 25(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Joel (2017). Edison vs. Tesla: The Battle over Their Last Invention. New York City: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1867). Machinery and Large-Scale Industry: Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf.Google Scholar
McArthur, Neil (2023). Gods in the machine? The rise of artificial intelligence may result in new religions, The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/gods-in-the-machine-the-rise-of-artificial-intelligence-may-result-in-new-religions-201068.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, Russell (2018). Studying Religion: An Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Alister (2011). Christian Theology: An Introduction (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McOmber, James B. (1999). Technological autonomy and three definitions of technology. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitcham, Carl (1986). Computers: From ethos and ethics to mythos and religion. Technology in Society, 8(3), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking through technology. In The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. Epilogue, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. www.compilerpress.ca/Competitiveness/Anno/Anno%20Mitcham%20TTT%202%20Epil.htm.Google Scholar
Mitcham, Carl (2022). Technology as a Theological Problem in the Christian Tradition. In Mitchum, Carl, Grote, James, & Checketts, Levi, eds., Theology and Technology, Volume 1: Essays in Christian Analysis, 1. London, UK: Perlego, 1–17.Google Scholar
Mitcham, Carl, Grote, Jim, & Checketts, Levi (2022). Theology and Technology, Volume 1 [Edition unavailable]. Wipf and Stock Publishers. https://www.perlego.com/book/3570594/theology-and-technology-volume-1-essays-in-christian-analysis-pdf.Google Scholar
Mitcham, Carl & Mackey, Robert (1971). Jacques Ellul and the technological society. Philosophy Today, 15(2), 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Lisa (2023). PODCAST: The race to God-like AI and what it means for humanity, Financial Review. www.afr.com/technology/the-race-to-god-like-ai-and-what-it-means-for-humanity-20230614-p5dgji.Google Scholar
NA (2012). Atelier: Demonic Technologies: Walter Benjamin and the Return of Religion in the Study of Technology [workshop], Intempestif Walter Benjamin Blog. https://intempestifbenjamin.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/atelier-demonic-technologies-walter-benjamin-and-the-return-of-religion-in-the-study-of-technology-harvard-27-avril-2012/.Google Scholar
Noble, David (1999). The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Ray (1997). Our vanishing third places. Planning Commissioners Journal, 25(4), 6–10.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter (2012). Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, Alan (2005). God versus technology? Science, secularity, and the theology of technology. Zygon, 40(3), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00689.x.Google Scholar
Peters, John D. (1999). Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivetti, Massimo (2015). Marx and the development of critical political economy. Review of Political Economy, 27(2), 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Principe, Walter (1983). Toward defining spirituality. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 12(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Brett. T. (2013). Appletopia: Media Technology and the Religious Imagination of Steve Jobs. Waco, TX: Baylor University.Google Scholar
Roden, David (2015). Posthuman Life: Philosophy on the Edge of the Human. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roobeek, Annemieke J. M. (1987). The crisis in Fordism and the rise of a new technological paradigm. Futures, 19(2), 129–154.Google Scholar
Rose, Steve (July 6, 2023). Five Ways AI Could Improve the World: “We Can Cure All Diseases, Stabilise Our Climate, Halt Poverty,” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/06/ai-artificial-intelligence-world-diseases-climate-scenarios-experts.Google Scholar
Salomon, Jean-Jacques (1984). What is technology? The Issue of its origins and definitions. History and Technology, an International Journal, 1(2), 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Sigal (September 7, 2023). Silicon Valley’s vision for AI? It’s religion, repackaged. Vox online. www.vox.com/the-highlight/23779413/silicon-valleys-ai-religion-transhumanism-longtermism-ea.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, Eric (2006). Technik comes to America: Changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2006.0132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singler, Beth (2020). “Blessed by the algorithm”: Theistic conceptions of artificial intelligence in online discourse. AI & Society, 35, 945–955.Google ScholarPubMed
Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. (2010). Beyond humanism: Reflections on trans-and posthumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
St. Lawrence, Emma (2023). TikTok, Technomancy & the Rise of Algorithmic Divination. Conference Presentation at the International Society of Media, Religion & Culture: Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
Stahl, William (1999). God and the Chip: Religion and the Culture of Technology. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Standage, Thomas (2014). The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s On-Line Pioneers. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Taylor, Josh & Hern, Alex (May 2, 2023). “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton Quits Google and Warns Over Dangers of Misinformation. The Guardian Online. https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/02/geoffrey-hinton-godfather-of-ai-quits-google-warns-dangers-of-machine-learning.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein (1921). The Engineers and the Price System. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
Wanjiru, Roseline (2015). Fordist Production. In Wherry, Frederick F. & Schor, Juliet B., eds., The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 708–709.Google Scholar
Weaver, David A., Lively, Erica, & Bimber, Bruce (2009). Searching for a frame: News media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Science Communication, 31(2), 139–166.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. (2004). The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty, Faculty Scholarship Series, 113, 1151–221, Paper 649, http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/649.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, John (1964). Translator’s introduction. In Ellul, Jacques, ed., The Technological Society, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., ix–xx.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
The PDF of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.