Studies on International Courts and Tribunals - Series page

pp ii-ii

The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration - Title page

pp iii-iii

Copyright page

pp iv-iv

Contents

pp v-vii

Figures

pp viii-ix

Tables

pp x-xi

Contributors

pp xii-xx

1 - Introduction: The Legitimacy Crisis and the Empirical Turn

pp 1-38

2 - The International Investment Regime and Its Discontents

pp 39-82

Part I - Process Legitimacy

pp 83-168

3 - Testing Cognitive Bias: Experimental Approaches and Investment Arbitration

pp 85-99

4 - The Influence of Law Firms in Investment Arbitration

pp 100-132

5 - Arbitrator Challenges in International Investment Tribunals

pp 133-158

6 - Dissents in Investment Arbitration: On Collegiality and Individualism

pp 159-168

Part II - Process Legitimacy

pp 169-280

7 - Foreign Investors, Domestic Courts and Investment Treaty Arbitration

pp 171-229

8 - Ensuring Correctness or Promoting Consistency? Tracking Policy Priorities in Investment Arbitration through Large-Scale Citation Analysis

pp 230-255

9 - Fair and Equitable Treatment: Ordering Chaos through Precedent?

pp 256-280

Part III - Output Legitimacy

pp 281-464

10 - The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration

pp 283-314

11 - Mixing Methodologies in Empirically Investigating Investment Arbitration and Inbound Foreign Investment

pp 315-364

12 - Double Jeopardy? The Use of Investment Arbitration in Times of Crisis

pp 365-393

13 - Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants

pp 394-423

Annex 1 - Excluded cases

pp 416-416

Annex 2 - Breakdown of cases

pp 417-423

14 - Explaining China’s Relative Absence from Investment Treaty Arbitration

pp 424-458

Annex 1 - Chinese BITs with No ISDS Provisions

pp 459-459

Annex 2 - Chinese BITs with Narrow ISDS Provisions

pp 460-460

Annex 3 - Chinese TIPs with ISDS Provisions

pp 461-461